Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "yardstick".
2009 Jul 29
2
A big 'Thank you' to the developpers
Thanks a lot for the new encoder_example and the two pass encoding.
I was not yet able to compare the gain of it against my previously encoded
video (HD content takes a lot of time to encode).
Why it can not be used with -v ? Could it be possible in the future ?
I had better result with -v than with -V before.
Congratulations again.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2015 Jan 15
1
Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
...age reads at the moment seems to me to strike a
> good balance between providing useful information and avoiding libel!
>
Being able to quantify what good-behaviour might be ( eg. multilib lines
up etc ) not only allows us to measure how good / bad a repo is, it also
gives the other repos a yardstick to work through in order to become good.
I realise that a good repo will do things that are hard to measure eg.
delta between upstream release of a patch and when it shows up in repo;
but a large bulk of things we should be able to automate I feel.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www...
2016 Aug 22
2
Memory scope proposal
...ported."
>
> It is not clear to me right now if the "use case" makes it "well justified" or not (an alternative being using intrinsic for OpenCL as Justin Lebar mentioned). I don’t feel I can answer this, so adding CC Chandler and Sanjoy to begin with.
>
> One yardstick to determine if this is "well justified" is to ask if any LLVM backend has an undefined behaviour similar to OpenCL if the scope metadata is dropped. For every LLVM target X which can be potentially targetted from OpenCL, if the metadata is dropped (in one module but not another), does th...
2016 Aug 21
2
Memory scope proposal
> On Aug 21, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/17/2016 03:05 PM, Mehdi Amini wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Zhuravlyov, Konstantin <Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com <mailto:Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Why not going with a metadata attachment directly
2009 Aug 21
1
LASSO: glmpath and cv.glmpath
Hi,
perhaps you can help me to find out, how to find the best Lambda in a
LASSO-model.
I have a feature selection problem with 150 proteins potentially
predicting Cancer or Noncancer. With a lasso model
fit.glm <- glmpath(x=as.matrix(X), y=target, family="binomial")
(target is 0, 1 <- Cancer non cancer, X the proteins, numerical in
expression), I get following path (PICTURE
2006 May 30
5
Rails - Postgres - importing data
I am writing a application where there is a lot of data in an old
Filemaker program that I am going to need to do a 1 time import...1 main
table and 2 related tables. I can get the data from Filemaker into a dbf
or csv or Excel file without problem.
Is anyone aware of a utility for postgresql or a rails plug-in that
might make this easier? I am worried about Rails import since I can''t
2011 Feb 09
5
Removing Outliers Function
I am working on a function that will remove outliers for regression analysis.
I am stating that a data point is an outlier if its studentized residual is
above or below 3 and -3, respectively. The code below is what i have thus
far for the function
x = c(1:20)
y = c(1,3,4,2,5,6,18,8,10,8,11,13,14,14,15,85,17,19,19,20)
data1 = data.frame(x,y)
rm.outliers =
2004 Aug 06
5
Number of listeners per server box ?
I have a proposal from RackSpace to put icecast on the following
hardware at their server farm. Can someone give me a "guesstimate" of
how many listeners each box can support?
Proposed hardware by RackSpace for each server box:
Dual 866 MHz processor
2 GB ECC RAM
100 Mbps connection
I need to know how many listeners can connect to each of these boxes.
I don't know how to
2015 Oct 14
4
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
...ut enough onus on the aggresser
to be more polite in a cross-culture community. And that, in a nutshell, is
what separates our culture from that of some other projects.
I'm incredibly proud of the community to which I belong. PaulR mentioned
the number of women at our devmtgs as a (very rough) yardstick - that was
actually mentioned to me by someone who had attended a number of
conferences in the compiler/low-level-software field as being surprisingly
large in comparison to the others. I'm proud of that, and feel we need to
increase our inclusiveness.
I'm happy for this CoC to come in and...
2015 Jan 14
6
Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
>>
>> Proposal:
>> The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories,
>> but should only note there are difficulties in making several independent
>> repositories safely usable and give a
2005 Nov 18
6
expected system load from DTrace scripts/probes
Does anyone out there have any thoughts on the type of load common
DTrace scripts would cause on a system if run 24x7? I know "common
DTrace scripts" and their underlining probe calls a vague statement. So
for the lack of a common and establish set of scripts in the OS, I''ll
use the most popular right for my question...the DTraceToolkit from
Brendan Gregg. Which by the
2015 Jan 14
4
Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote:
>> KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with
>> discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel
>> having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing
>>
2015 Oct 13
2
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On 13 October 2015 at 18:59, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> We have *not* appointed any such committee at this point.
>> (...)
>> The appeal is to the board of the Foundation. I don't expect the board to
>>
2019 Nov 05
3
RFC: On non 8-bit bytes and the target for it
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:00 PM James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To throw my hat into the ring, we also maintain a downstream target that
> has a subset of this problem - it has non-8-bit-addressable memory. This
> means that %uglygeps don't work, pointers can't be casted to i8* and expect
> to be byte-addressed (conversions to