Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "yabba".
Did you mean:
abba
2004 Sep 23
2
[LLVMdev] struct and class under VC7.1
...:
%addresult = add int 1, %AnArg ; <int> [#uses=1]
ret int %addresult
}
int %foo() {
EntryBlock:
%add1 = call int %add1( int 10 ) ; <int>
[#uses=1]
ret int %add1
}
Running foo: Result: 11
D:\home\arathorn\sandbox\llvm>
Yabba! Yabba! Yabba! ;-)
---
Paolo Invernizzi
2004 Sep 23
0
[LLVMdev] struct and class under VC7.1
...ret int %addresult
> }
>
> int %foo() {
> EntryBlock:
> %add1 = call int %add1( int 10 ) ; <int>
> [#uses=1]
> ret int %add1
> }
>
>
> Running foo: Result: 11
>
> D:\home\arathorn\sandbox\llvm>
>
> Yabba! Yabba! Yabba! ;-)
>
> ---
> Paolo Invernizzi
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part -----------...
2004 Sep 23
0
[LLVMdev] struct and class under VC7.1
MSVC++ is picky about this. It considers classes and structs to be
different types so you have to be consistent. If you forward declared a
struct as a class within the same compilation unit, it would complain
about that too. It's not just linking.
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:59:42 +0200
Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Finally I managed to find
2004 Sep 23
2
[LLVMdev] struct and class under VC7.1
Hi all,
Finally I managed to find out a strange problem under Visual C
During the link of the HowToUseJIT program, I was always missing some
symbols... and I was going crazy testing out different options...
At the end, unmangling the differences in what linker was searching and
what was present in the libraries, I found that the problem is
that we have something like this...
Value.h
struct