Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "xz_utils".
Did you mean:
c_utils
2015 Nov 04
2
Building R for AIX in 64-bit mode
...icular - I wonder about lzma as I already knew this (having built
xz a long time ago. LZMA has been replaced by XZ. Do not know why, and
do not want to.
BUT there is no reliable source for LZMA5 (the XZ project only reports
LZMA2 and LZMA4). Please see the wiki at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils
Paused for now - awaiting reply
> configure:35724: checking for lzma_version_number in -llzma
> configure:35757: gcc -maix64 -std=gnu99 -o conftest -I/opt/64/include
> -I/opt/buildaix/include -O2 -mminimal-toc -I/opt/buildaix/include
> -I/opt/include -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c -ll...
2015 Nov 06
0
Building R for AIX in 64-bit mode
...zma as I already knew this (having
> built xz a long time ago. LZMA has been replaced by XZ. Do not know
> why, and do not want to.
> BUT there is no reliable source for LZMA5 (the XZ project only reports
> LZMA2 and LZMA4). Please see the wiki at:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils
>
> Paused for now - awaiting reply
Well, seems I stand corrected - it is not a change since 17 October, but
since R-3.2.2 and some directories have been removed from R distribution.
However, I am wondering about this logic - of requiring both lzma and
xz, whereas before xz was required if...
2015 Nov 04
2
Building R for AIX in 64-bit mode
On 2015-10-15 15:02, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On 15/10/2015 13:32, Michael Felt wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Just wanted to let you know I am getting close to packaging R for AIX in
>> 64.bit mode.
>
> Which version? (You mentioned 3.1.3 and 3.2.2 far below.) There is
> little value in reporting on frozen branches, and most value in
> reporting on R-devel where