Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "xyza".
Did you mean:
xyz
2010 Nov 17
2
Bug in agrep computing edit distance?
...;,"lazy",max=list(sub=0))
which makes sense, but
agrep("lasy","lazybc",max=1)
agrep("lasy","lazybc",max=0.001)
agrep("lasy","layt",max=list(all=1))
and
agrep("x",c("x","xy","xyz","xyza"),max=list(insertions=2))
agrep("x",c("x","xy","xyz","xyza"),max=list(deletions=2))
agrep("x",c("x","xy","xyz","xyza"),max=list(all=2))
all give "1 2 3 4" ??
this makes it clear...
2005 May 01
3
win32-dir 0.1.0 compile problems
I tried to download/compile/install win32-dir, but I couldn''t get it to
go. Over a private email Daniel Berger had me...
"Curious. What platform are you on exactly? Try
modifying the extconf.rb file. Add
''have_library("SHFolder")'' above
''have_library("shell32")''. If that doesn''t work, try
uncommenting the other
2010 Nov 16
1
Bug in agrep computing edit distance?
The documentation for agrep says it uses the Levenshtein edit distance,
but it seems to get this wrong in certain cases when there is a
combination of deletions and substitutions. For example:
> agrep("abcd", "abcxyz", max.distance=1)
[1] 1
That should've been a no-match. The edit distance between those strings
is 3 (1 substitution, 2 deletions), but agrep matches
2008 Mar 13
1
R Finance
Hi,
I am an R novice working with financial data. I am developing a
portfolio strategy evaluation technique to back-test the performance
of our screens; checking how the screened stock would've performed
over the period in question.
I am using quantmod in R to download the historical data from yahoo
and then analyzing it using PerformanceAnalytics. My problem is that,
as our screens are done