search for: xyproblem

...However, the shutdown process assumes upsmon is local. However, there's a normal plan, and if what you are doing is even sort of normal, it's likely best to do the normal thing, unless you can articulate why you want something different. So: 0) Read some stuff on the web: https://xyproblem.info/ https://dontasktoask.com/ (not quite on point) 1) Tell us your situation and what you want to accomplish. 2) Tell us why, after having read the docs, you are heading towards a non-standard setup.

...e's a normal plan, and if what you are doing is even sort of > > normal, it's likely best to do the normal thing, unless you can > > articulate why you want something different. > > > > So: > > > > 0) Read some stuff on the web: > > https://xyproblem.info/ > > https://dontasktoask.com/ (not quite on point) > > > > 1) Tell us your situation and what you want to accomplish. > > > > 2) Tell us why, after having read the docs, you are heading towards a > > non-standard setup. > > To explain t...

...e). It converts PHI nodes and related expressions into SCEV expressions and computes trip counts off of these SCEV expressions; and there is no reliable way to map a SCEV expression back into a PHI node (though it may be possible in some cases). However this is sounding like an XY problem (http://xyproblem.info/) :) Do you mind taking a step back and giving us some information about the broader picture? > 2017-08-13 14:55 GMT+02:00 Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya >> To continue this topic: >> sometimes SCEV's behavior is rather controversial : for loops with i >> changing as i \=2 f...

...s local. > > However, there's a normal plan, and if what you are doing is even sort of > normal, it's likely best to do the normal thing, unless you can > articulate why you want something different. > > So: > > 0) Read some stuff on the web: > https://xyproblem.info/ > https://dontasktoask.com/ (not quite on point) > > 1) Tell us your situation and what you want to accomplish. > > 2) Tell us why, after having read the docs, you are heading towards a > non-standard setup. To explain the motivation behind my questio...

Would it be at all useful to have just the nut "server" components installed and running on a machine without a nut-monitor service running? -- Orion Poplawski IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion at nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/

On 2018-10-22 12:16, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 10/21/2018 8:23 AM, Andr? Rodier wrote: >> I am using Zabbix to monitor my Dovecot server, and my logs are filled >> with lines like this: >> >>> Oct 21 15:04:46 osaka dovecot[1256]: pop3-login: Aborted login (no >>> auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, >>> secured,

To continue this topic: sometimes SCEV's behavior is rather controversial : for loops with i changing as i \=2 for example, he can't figure what the type of expressions is, but surprisingly can determine max trip count. Shouldn't it be able to detect or not detect these parameters at the same time? 2017-08-11 15:56 GMT+02:00 Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya < anastasiya.ruzhanskaya at

On 26/05/15 18.29, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Tue 2015-05-26 17:42:40 -0400, Kasper Dupont wrote: > > But it does not address all my requirements. I have a > > requirement that the hostname being used must be visible > > to the administrator of the SSH server. And it must be > > visible with minimal effort without requiring any software > > changes on the