Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "xxxxat".
Did you mean:
xxxpat
2020 Apr 08
3
samba 4.12 build on hp-ux unsupported system calls
Hi Team,
We are having compile/linking time warning due unsatisfied system calls and macros.
We have checked and confirm that these are not supported by hp-ux kernel and enabling them will require changes in VFS layer and physical filesystem.
Unsatisfied system calls
* renameat
* symlinkat
* linkat
* unlinkat
* readlinkat
* mkdirat
Undefined
2020 Apr 08
0
samba 4.12 build on hp-ux unsupported system calls
...> These system calls have been added newly in samba 4.12.
>
> Please provide workaround/patch to use older syscalls like mkdir,readlink,unlink etc within samba 4.12.
I'm afraid that can't be done.
It's not possible to write a secure path-safe
modern application without the XXXXat() calls.
That's why we're moving to require them.
HPUX kernel will have to add these calls,
or the HPUX ecosystem can't be maintained
going forward. Sorry for the bad news :-(.
Either that or you'll have to add mappings
in your libc to emulate these calls, but
that won't be s...
2016 Jan 14
4
Proposal: always handle keys in separate process
Hello,
in light of the recent CVE-2016-0777, I came up with the following idea,
that would have lessened its impact. Feel free to ignore or flame me,
maybe its stupid or I missed something :)
- private key material should only ever be handled in a separate process
from the SSH client. ssh-agent (maybe slightly extended) seems the
logical choice.
- in places where the client currently reads