Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "xxxmsec".
Did you mean:
xxx_spec
2007 Feb 15
2
profile provider: is it me doing stupid things?
...ount();
}
profile:::tick-1000ms
{
baseline = timestamp;
printa("%3d %@u\n", @);
clear(@);
}
END
{
}
And this one does show a uniform distribution of the system calls as I expected:
3 10601
2 10610
1 10940
0 11534
Question: why is the profile:::tick-xxxmsec behaving this way? What am I missing?
Thanks
Paul
This message posted from opensolaris.org