Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "xxxcallingconv".
Did you mean:
x86callingconv
2013 Sep 25
0
[LLVMdev] request for tutorial
...name lengths may have changed), that would radically alter how
easy it is to teach/learn about the backends too, for example, with a "real
backend", it's just not going to be realistic to have a learning material
like the following:
1. Explain calling convention handling, and how XXXCallingConv.td works
2. Have an exercise "implement a calling conv with these properties:
..."
... since with a real backend, you don't want to be messing around and
inserting random new calling conventions/instructions/etc., but with a stub
(or even better, a clone of the stub), it is natura...
2013 Sep 25
2
[LLVMdev] request for tutorial
On 25 September 2013 11:50, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>wrote:
> I asked for this several times and the conclusion was "no, what for,
> we have plenty of other backends in the tree which can be thought as
> examples". IMHO, it will be nice thing to have though...
>
I think that it would be fine as long as we have two conditions:
* Fixes on other