Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "xxx_device".
Did you mean:
qxl_device
2020 Feb 14
0
[PATCH V2 3/5] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus
...of multi-functional PCI device
> Exactly how this works is still under active discussion and is
> one place where Greg said 'use a bus'.
That's ok but it's something that is not directly related to vDPA which
can be implemented by any kinds of devices/buses:
struct XXX_device {
struct vdpa_device vdpa;
struct adi_device/pci_device *lowerdev;
}
...
> - An existing PCI, platform, or other bus and device. No need for an
> extra bus here, PCI is the bus.
There're several examples that a bus is needed on top.
A good example is Mellanox TmFIFO driver whic...
2020 Feb 13
2
[PATCH V2 3/5] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:56:00AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:51:54AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > That bus is exactly what Greg KH proposed. There are other ways
> > > to solve this I guess but this bikeshedding is getting tiring.
> >
> > This discussion was for a different goal, IMHO.
>
> Hmm couldn't find it
2020 Feb 13
2
[PATCH V2 3/5] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:56:00AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:51:54AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > That bus is exactly what Greg KH proposed. There are other ways
> > > to solve this I guess but this bikeshedding is getting tiring.
> >
> > This discussion was for a different goal, IMHO.
>
> Hmm couldn't find it