search for: xtat

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 34 matches for "xtat".

Did you mean: stat
2004 May 15
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/src
On Sat, 15 May 2004, CVS User ttroxell wrote: > if [ -f /etc/logcheck/header.txt ] ; then > - $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report > + $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report \ > + || error "Could not append header to $TMPDIR/report Disk full?" > fi > } > > @@ -152,7 +157,8 @@ > # Add a footer
2004 Aug 28
1
Bug#268277: logcheck documentation bug
...not see it? If the latter is the case, perhaps I should add a pointer to it in logcheck.8. Cheers, -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `' `- ]
2006 Jul 03
1
New logcheck committer
Martin F. Krafft (madduck) has been added to the project. P.S. I'd like to get a release out sometime next week. -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060703/ffbdd621/attachment.pgp
2004 Jun 13
1
intermittent access this week
...to be extremely bored while offline so I'll probably get some logcheck work done. <: Cheers, -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `' `- ] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermai...
2006 Jul 04
1
no such user
I have rules like this on my servers: ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ proftpd\[[[:digit:]]+\]: [._[:alnum:]-]+ \([._[:alnum:]-]+\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\) (- )USER [-_.[:alnum:]]+: no such user found from [._[:alnum:]-]+ \[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\ to [[:digit:].]{7,15}:21$ basically, I just don't care about logins as nonexistent users, I get so many of those that I don't even
2005 Dec 23
4
Bug#344553: logcheck: Fails silently to read config file
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.42 Severity: minor Tags: patch Logcheck does not report any error if the config file is not readable or does not exists. This may easily happen, as logcheck is run as logcheck user and while one is testing a new configuration on live system with running configuration intact. Following fragment may help: # Now source the config file - before things that should
2005 Jan 23
2
logcheck-database -- volatile?
...ase see http://volatile.debian.net/mirrors.html Cheers, Andi ----- End forwarded message ----- -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `' `- ] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermai...
2005 Jun 03
2
[ttroxell@debian.org: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages]
...some docs to the tune of "please run dpkg -S $RULEFILE before submitting a bug." Cheers, -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `' `- ] ----- End forwarded message ----- -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || ht...
2005 Nov 08
1
It's not filtering this one specific line...
I keep seeing... "Nov 7 23:08:09 ns1 amavis[24086]: (24086-06) WARN: all primary virus scanners failed, considering backups" And no matter what I try to make a rule filter for it, it won't go away! I've tested my rules by doing `cat /var/log/mail.log | egrep "$my_rule"` and it would work and scroll out all the matched output. Here is one of the rules I tried...
2004 Jun 28
0
Bug#212149: current date/hostname macros
...eems relatively worthless. Feel free to prove otherwise. Until then, I'm closing this. Thanks, -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `' `- ] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermai...
2004 Aug 10
1
one = sign to much?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I think I found a mistake in the postfix file in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server. There is one equal sign to much in this line: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd\[[0-9]+\]: [[:alnum:]]+: client=[^[:space:]]+, sasl_method=[[:alnum:]]+, sasl_username==[-_.@[:alnum:]]+$ I think it should be: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2005 Jan 08
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/debian
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005, CVS User ttroxell wrote: > @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ > chown logcheck /var/lock/logcheck > /dev/null 2>&1 || true > fi > > + # fix for #284788 > + # update timestamp on cron > + touch /etc/cron.d/logcheck || true > + > ;; > > abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) on a box with a broken coreutils install
2005 Feb 19
1
Why no dhclient in ignore.d.workstation?
hello logcheck team, is there a reason why no dhclient patterns are provided in ignore.d.workstation? in ignore.d.server there are all necessery pattern for dhclient, but a workstation typicaly uses dhcp an those messages reported by logcheck are annoying. are there any good reasons not to include dhclient patterns in ignore.d.workstation or are they simply missed? thank you for any feedback!
2005 Sep 22
0
Bug#302379: use dh_installlogcheck in logcheck-database instead?
Perhaps we do not need to have logcheck user in base if we install our own rules with dh_installlogcheck. Related: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/2005-September/002096.html -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
2005 Dec 24
1
Bug#344620: ignore.server.d/postfix: 'address not listed for hostname' rule
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.42 Severity: normal Tags: patch Index: postfix =================================================================== --- postfix (revision 1097) +++ postfix (working copy) @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ # Postfix < 2.1 ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtp\[[0-9]+\]: connect to [^[:space:]]+: server dropped connection without sending the initial greeting
2005 Oct 29
1
Bug#336265: logrotate detection, possible attack not checked by logcheck
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.41 Problem: Logcheck try to detect if log file have been rotate or not by file size way. Possible attack: - current log file (sizeA) - run logcheck, (logcheck/logtail put inode in offsetfile), offset=sizeA - [attacker run attack 1] - run logrotate - [attacker run attack 2] - run logcheck may don't detect the rotation and don't check the log for attack 1
2006 Jul 08
2
building the logcheck package from SVN
apt-get install svn-buildpackage cat <<_eof >> ~/.svn-buildpackage.conf svn-lintian svn-linda svn-move _eof mkdir logcheck; cd logcheck svn co svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/logcheck/logcheck/trunk cd trunk svn-buildpackage -k<your key ID> -rfakeroot man svn-buildpackage for more. Nice, huh? -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org> : :' :
2004 Jun 04
2
Bug#252597: logcheck: user logchecks mails should be delivered to root
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: important Since logcheck changed to run as user logcheck, the error mails of the cron daemon end up in /var/mail/logcheck where nobody reads them. Mails for logcheck should be aliased to root like all the other mails of system accounts. I was searching for a long time what was wrong with my logcheck not delivering any mails. The lock directory was
2004 Jun 03
1
4 important bugs again <;
hello everyone, thanks to todd 1.2.21 is out :) every release getting better, i would like to get consensus on these "important" bugs: #252078 logtail: should depend on perl >= 5.8 sarge as any other modern linux distro use perl 5.8.x, it's even inside of its base. backports are under the peril of its author if no one voices up, i'll close that bug in the next days.
2004 May 21
2
Bug#247360: logcheck: Where's NEWS.Debian?
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #247360 I can't find NEWS.Debian in the package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii adduser