Displaying 20 results from an estimated 34 matches for "xtat".
Did you mean:
stat
2004 May 15
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/src
On Sat, 15 May 2004, CVS User ttroxell wrote:
> if [ -f /etc/logcheck/header.txt ] ; then
> - $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report
> + $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report \
> + || error "Could not append header to $TMPDIR/report Disk full?"
> fi
> }
>
> @@ -152,7 +157,8 @@
> # Add a footer
2004 Aug 28
1
Bug#268277: logcheck documentation bug
...not see it?
If the latter is the case, perhaps I should add a pointer to it in
logcheck.8.
Cheers,
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `'
`- ]
2006 Jul 03
1
New logcheck committer
Martin F. Krafft (madduck) has been added to the project.
P.S. I'd like to get a release out sometime next week.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060703/ffbdd621/attachment.pgp
2004 Jun 13
1
intermittent access this week
...to be extremely bored while offline so I'll
probably get some logcheck work done. <:
Cheers,
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `'
`- ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermai...
2006 Jul 04
1
no such user
I have rules like this on my servers:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ proftpd\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
[._[:alnum:]-]+ \([._[:alnum:]-]+\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\) (- )USER
[-_.[:alnum:]]+: no such user found from [._[:alnum:]-]+
\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\ to [[:digit:].]{7,15}:21$
basically, I just don't care about logins as nonexistent users,
I get so many of those that I don't even
2005 Dec 23
4
Bug#344553: logcheck: Fails silently to read config file
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.42
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Logcheck does not report any error if the config file is not readable
or does not exists. This may easily happen, as logcheck is run as
logcheck user and while one is testing a new configuration on live
system with running configuration intact.
Following fragment may help:
# Now source the config file - before things that should
2005 Jan 23
2
logcheck-database -- volatile?
...ase see http://volatile.debian.net/mirrors.html
Cheers,
Andi
----- End forwarded message -----
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `'
`- ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermai...
2005 Jun 03
2
[ttroxell@debian.org: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages]
...some docs to the tune of "please run dpkg -S $RULEFILE before
submitting a bug."
Cheers,
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `'
`- ]
----- End forwarded message -----
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || ht...
2005 Nov 08
1
It's not filtering this one specific line...
I keep seeing...
"Nov 7 23:08:09 ns1 amavis[24086]: (24086-06) WARN: all primary
virus scanners failed, considering backups"
And no matter what I try to make a rule filter for it, it won't go
away! I've tested my rules by doing `cat /var/log/mail.log | egrep
"$my_rule"` and it would work and scroll out all the matched output.
Here is one of the rules I tried...
2004 Jun 28
0
Bug#212149: current date/hostname macros
...eems relatively worthless.
Feel free to prove otherwise. Until then, I'm closing this.
Thanks,
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `'
`- ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermai...
2004 Aug 10
1
one = sign to much?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I think I found a mistake in the postfix file
in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server. There is one equal sign to much in this
line:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd\[[0-9]+\]: [[:alnum:]]+:
client=[^[:space:]]+, sasl_method=[[:alnum:]]+,
sasl_username==[-_.@[:alnum:]]+$
I think it should be:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2005 Jan 08
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/debian
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005, CVS User ttroxell wrote:
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@
> chown logcheck /var/lock/logcheck > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
> fi
>
> + # fix for #284788
> + # update timestamp on cron
> + touch /etc/cron.d/logcheck || true
> +
> ;;
>
> abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
on a box with a broken coreutils install
2005 Feb 19
1
Why no dhclient in ignore.d.workstation?
hello logcheck team,
is there a reason why no dhclient patterns are provided in
ignore.d.workstation? in ignore.d.server there are all necessery pattern
for dhclient, but a workstation typicaly uses dhcp an those messages
reported by logcheck are annoying.
are there any good reasons not to include dhclient patterns in
ignore.d.workstation or are they simply missed?
thank you for any feedback!
2005 Sep 22
0
Bug#302379: use dh_installlogcheck in logcheck-database instead?
Perhaps we do not need to have logcheck user in base if we install our own
rules with dh_installlogcheck.
Related:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/2005-September/002096.html
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
2005 Dec 24
1
Bug#344620: ignore.server.d/postfix: 'address not listed for hostname' rule
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.42
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Index: postfix
===================================================================
--- postfix (revision 1097)
+++ postfix (working copy)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
# Postfix < 2.1
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtp\[[0-9]+\]: connect to [^[:space:]]+: server dropped connection without sending the initial greeting
2005 Oct 29
1
Bug#336265: logrotate detection, possible attack not checked by logcheck
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.41
Problem: Logcheck try to detect if log file have been rotate or not by file size way.
Possible attack:
- current log file (sizeA)
- run logcheck, (logcheck/logtail put inode in offsetfile), offset=sizeA
- [attacker run attack 1]
- run logrotate
- [attacker run attack 2]
- run logcheck may don't detect the rotation and don't check the log for attack 1
2006 Jul 08
2
building the logcheck package from SVN
apt-get install svn-buildpackage
cat <<_eof >> ~/.svn-buildpackage.conf
svn-lintian
svn-linda
svn-move
_eof
mkdir logcheck; cd logcheck
svn co svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/logcheck/logcheck/trunk
cd trunk
svn-buildpackage -k<your key ID> -rfakeroot
man svn-buildpackage for more. Nice, huh?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :' :
2004 Jun 04
2
Bug#252597: logcheck: user logchecks mails should be delivered to root
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.20a
Severity: important
Since logcheck changed to run as user logcheck, the error mails of the cron
daemon end up in /var/mail/logcheck where nobody reads them. Mails for
logcheck should be aliased to root like all the other mails of system
accounts.
I was searching for a long time what was wrong with my logcheck not
delivering any mails. The lock directory was
2004 Jun 03
1
4 important bugs again <;
hello everyone,
thanks to todd 1.2.21 is out :)
every release getting better, i would like to get
consensus on these "important" bugs:
#252078 logtail: should depend on perl >= 5.8
sarge as any other modern linux distro use perl 5.8.x,
it's even inside of its base.
backports are under the peril of its author
if no one voices up, i'll close that bug in the next days.
2004 May 21
2
Bug#247360: logcheck: Where's NEWS.Debian?
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.20a
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #247360
I can't find NEWS.Debian in the package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii adduser