search for: xt_redirect

...rack_ftp 5104 1 nf_nat_ftp, nf_conntrack_ipv4 4676 4 nf_conntrack_ipv6 5488 3 nf_conntrack_irc 2800 1 nf_nat_irc, nf_defrag_ipv4 742 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4, nf_defrag_ipv6 8865 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6, nf_nat 9823 7 nf_nat_irc,nf_nat_ftp,xt_REDIRECT,ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,xt_nat,nf_nat_ipv4, nf_nat_ftp 1216 0 nf_nat_ipv4 2462 1 iptable_nat, nf_nat_irc 928 0 nls_base 5038 2 cifs,usbcore, ppp_async 6144 0 ppp_generic 19698 3 pppoe,pppox,ppp_async, pppoe...

...at_ftp, >nf_conntrack_ipv4 4676 4 >nf_conntrack_ipv6 5488 3 >nf_conntrack_irc 2800 1 nf_nat_irc, >nf_defrag_ipv4 742 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4, >nf_defrag_ipv6 8865 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6, >nf_nat 9823 7 >nf_nat_irc,nf_nat_ftp,xt_REDIRECT,ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,xt_nat,nf_nat_ipv4, >nf_nat_ftp 1216 0 >nf_nat_ipv4 2462 1 iptable_nat, >nf_nat_irc 928 0 >nls_base 5038 2 cifs,usbcore, >ppp_async 6144 0 >ppp_generic 19698 3 pppoe,ppp...

..._ipv4 4676 4 >>nf_conntrack_ipv6 5488 3 >>nf_conntrack_irc 2800 1 nf_nat_irc, >>nf_defrag_ipv4 742 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4, >>nf_defrag_ipv6 8865 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6, >>nf_nat 9823 7 >>nf_nat_irc,nf_nat_ftp,xt_REDIRECT,ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,xt_nat,nf_nat_ipv4, >>nf_nat_ftp 1216 0 >>nf_nat_ipv4 2462 1 iptable_nat, >>nf_nat_irc 928 0 >>nls_base 5038 2 cifs,usbcore, >>ppp_async 6144 0 >>ppp_generic...

[CC'ing the list] On Feb 23, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Tim Dawson wrote: > I don't think USB support is a given in OpwnWRT - some builds have it, some don't, and some are just a bit wonky. > Most USB builds support USB disk - the USB serial driver is a different beast, and even if one is there does not imply the other. > > I'd be interested in the output of 'lsmod',

2014-02-23 17:57 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Josu Lazkano wrote: > >> The problem is that I don't know where to configure it. >> >> Anyone with a UPS connect to a OpenWRT device? > > What version of OpenWRT? > > I haven't tried this myself, but it looks like recent versions of OpenWRT use UCI,

...o start the domU again to boot correctly. Can this patch be added to the CentOS 7 kernel-plus? [ 13.372417] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 13.372434] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c:252! [ 13.372441] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 13.372450] Modules linked in: xt_owner nf_nat_ftp xt_REDIRECT nf_nat_redirect xt_conntrack iptable_mangle nf_conntrack_ftp xt_LOG xt_limit xt_multiport iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 iptable_filter vfat fat isofs xfs libcrc32c loop sb_edac edac_core coretemp intel_rapl iosf_mbi crc32_pclm...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=852 Summary: IPv6 TEE target sends packets to original IP address on wrong network device Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: unknown

I experienced a bug that is likely the same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1350373 . Commit b7dd0e350e0bd4c0fddcc9b8958342700b00b168 , which is supposed to fix it, doesn't appear in this kernel and doesn't apply cleanly either. Is there any point in trying to backport the patch? The backtrace is as follows: [ 32.304666] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [