search for: xt_log

...8528 0 x_tables 11093 32 ip6t_REJECT,ip6t_rt,ip6t_hbh,ip6t_mh,ip6t_ipv6header,ip6t_frag,ip6t_eui64,ip6t_ah,ip6table_raw,ip6table_mangle,ip6table_filter,ip6_tables,xt_REDIRECT,ipt_MASQUERADE,xt_nat,xt_conntrack,xt_CT,iptable_raw,xt_state,xt_mark,xt_time,ipt_REJECT,xt_TCPMSS,xt_LOG,xt_comment,xt_multiport,xt_mac,xt_limit,iptable_mangle,iptable_filter,ip_tables,xt_tcpudp, xt_CT 2288 0 xt_LOG 9392 0 xt_REDIRECT 1040 0 xt_TCPMSS 2688 2 xt_comment 480 64 xt_conntrack 2144 6 xt_limit...

...8528 0 >x_tables 11093 32 >ip6t_REJECT,ip6t_rt,ip6t_hbh,ip6t_mh,ip6t_ipv6header,ip6t_frag,ip6t_eui64,ip6t_ah,ip6table_raw,ip6table_mangle,ip6table_filter,ip6_tables,xt_REDIRECT,ipt_MASQUERADE,xt_nat,xt_conntrack,xt_CT,iptable_raw,xt_state,xt_mark,xt_time,ipt_REJECT,xt_TCPMSS,xt_LOG,xt_comment,xt_multiport,xt_mac,xt_limit,iptable_mangle,iptable_filter,ip_tables,xt_tcpudp, >xt_CT 2288 0 >xt_LOG 9392 0 >xt_REDIRECT 1040 0 >xt_TCPMSS 2688 2 >xt_comment 480 64 >xt_conntrack...

Hi, I have 2 Debian testing boxes running a very similar setup (both running the latest aptosid kernel); on one of them, since the iptables/libxtables10 packages have been upgraded from 1.4.19.1-1 to 1.4.20-2, shorewall-init can''t start shorewall anymore and for this reason ifupdown also fails triggering firewall up. Shorewall can be successfully started later on, and ifupdown starts

...16384 3 nf_conntrack_ipv6 20480 11 nf_defrag_ipv6 36864 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6 ipt_REJECT 16384 1 nf_reject_ipv4 16384 1 ipt_REJECT xt_comment 16384 4 nf_log_ipv4 16384 10 nf_log_common 16384 2 nf_log_ipv4,nf_log_ipv6 xt_LOG 16384 20 xt_multiport 16384 4 xt_limit 16384 21 xt_tcpudp 16384 18 xt_addrtype 16384 4 nf_conntrack_ipv4 16384 11 nf_defrag_ipv4 16384 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4 xt_conntrack 16384 22 ip6table_filter 1638...

Rowland, The computer name 'martin-RB042AV-ABA-a1410y' was set by Linux Mint when it was installed. I'm not sure I can change it. I check it on the Mint forum. I'll turn off the smb... feature and see what happens. Yes the ports listed below are open and set to pass through the firewall. Should I unset the netbios name". Going to try the modification to the ufw rules file as

...MA790FX-DS5 kernel: btrfs: block rsv returned -28 kernel: Modules linked in: raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor xor async_tx raid6_pq act_police cls_basic cls_flow cls_fw cls_u32 sch_tbf sch_prio sch_htb sch_hfsc sch_ingress sch_sfq xt_CHECKSUM ipt_rpfilter xt_statistic xt_CT xt_LOG xt_time xt_connlimit xt_realm xt_addrtype xt_comment xt_recent xt_policy xt_nat ipt_ULOG ipt_REJECT ipt_MASQUERADE ipt_ECN ipt_CLUSTERIP ipt_ah xt_set ip_set nf_nat _tftp nf_nat_snmp_basic nf_conntrack_snmp nf_nat_sip nf_nat_pptp nf_nat_proto_gre nf_nat_irc nf_nat_h323 nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack_tftp...

...0 >>x_tables 11093 32 >>ip6t_REJECT,ip6t_rt,ip6t_hbh,ip6t_mh,ip6t_ipv6header,ip6t_frag,ip6t_eui64,ip6t_ah,ip6table_raw,ip6table_mangle,ip6table_filter,ip6_tables,xt_REDIRECT,ipt_MASQUERADE,xt_nat,xt_conntrack,xt_CT,iptable_raw,xt_state,xt_mark,xt_time,ipt_REJECT,xt_TCPMSS,xt_LOG,xt_comment,xt_multiport,xt_mac,xt_limit,iptable_mangle,iptable_filter,ip_tables,xt_tcpudp, >>xt_CT 2288 0 >>xt_LOG 9392 0 >>xt_REDIRECT 1040 0 >>xt_TCPMSS 2688 2 >>xt_comment 480 64 >>...

[CC'ing the list] On Feb 23, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Tim Dawson wrote: > I don't think USB support is a given in OpwnWRT - some builds have it, some don't, and some are just a bit wonky. > Most USB builds support USB disk - the USB serial driver is a different beast, and even if one is there does not imply the other. > > I'd be interested in the output of 'lsmod',

...16384 3 nf_conntrack_ipv6 20480 11 nf_defrag_ipv6 36864 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6 ipt_REJECT 16384 1 nf_reject_ipv4 16384 1 ipt_REJECT xt_comment 16384 4 nf_log_ipv4 16384 10 nf_log_common 16384 2 nf_log_ipv4,nf_log_ipv6 xt_LOG 16384 20 xt_multiport 16384 4 xt_limit 16384 21 xt_tcpudp 16384 18 xt_addrtype 16384 4 nf_conntrack_ipv4 16384 11 nf_defrag_ipv4 16384 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4 xt_conntrack 16384 22 ip6table_filter 1638...

....15-22.el6.x86_64 Console output: [59826.069427] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP [59826.069463] Modules linked in: xt_physdev br_netfilter xt_mac ebt_arp xen_pciback xen_gntalloc ebtable_filter ebtables bridge 8021q mrp garp stp llc xt_CT xt_addrtype iptable_raw nf_log_ ipv4 nf_log_common xt_LOG xt_limit xt_owner iptable_mangle iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_sta te nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables blktap xen_netback xen_blkback xen_gntdev xen_evtchn xenfs xen_privcmd ppdev parport_pc parp...

2014-02-23 17:57 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Josu Lazkano wrote: > >> The problem is that I don't know where to configure it. >> >> Anyone with a UPS connect to a OpenWRT device? > > What version of OpenWRT? > > I haven't tried this myself, but it looks like recent versions of OpenWRT use UCI,

...16384 1 nf_nat 40960 2 iptable_nat,xt_MASQUERADE iptable_filter 16384 1 ipt_REJECT 16384 0 nf_reject_ipv4 16384 1 ipt_REJECT ip_tables 32768 2 iptable_filter,iptable_nat x_tables 40960 9 xt_conntrack,iptable_filter,xt_LOG,xt_string,xt_tcpudp,xt_addrtype,ipt_REJECT,ip_tables,xt_MASQUERADE + echo POST + nc -w10 example.com 80 HTTP/1.0 501 Not Implemented Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 357 Connection: close Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:43:33 GMT Server: ECSF (nyb/1D24) <?xml version="1.0" encoding=&...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1115 Bug ID: 1115 Summary: Not all packets leaving the system get masqueraded Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee: netfilter-buglog

...set_elem: add nft_set_elems_nlmsg_build_payload_iter() common: add batching interfaces examples: nft-chain-add: add chain_add_parse() examples: nft-chain-add: support new batching interface utils: define xfree() as macro src: get rid of cached copies of x_tables.h and xt_LOG.h src: add ruleset generation class src: fix compilation without xml/json support remove empty src/attr.c expr: nat: use 'nat_type' instead of 'type' in the parser src: consolidate XML/JSON exportation expr: data_reg: use 'reg' instead of...

...78] PGD 140a75067 PUD 100702067 PMD 0 [ 2643.920483] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2643.920487] Modules linked in: act_police cls_basic cls_flow cls_fw cls_u32 sch_fq_codel sch_tbf sch_prio sch_htb sch_hfsc sch_sfq arptable_filter arp_tables xt_CHECKSUM ipt_rpfilter xt_geoip(O) xt_statistic xt_CT xt_LOG xt_connlimit xt_realm xt_addrtype xt_comment xt_recent ipt_ULOG ipt_MASQUERADE ipt_ECN ipt_CLUSTERIP ipt_ah xt_set nf_nat_tftp nf_nat_snmp_basic nf_conntrack_snmp nf_nat_sip nf_nat_pptp nf_nat_proto_gre nf_nat_irc nf_nat_h323 nf_nat_ftp nf_nat_amanda ts_kmp nf_conntrack_amanda nf_conntrack_sane nf_...

...CentOS 7 kernel-plus? [ 13.372417] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 13.372434] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c:252! [ 13.372441] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 13.372450] Modules linked in: xt_owner nf_nat_ftp xt_REDIRECT nf_nat_redirect xt_conntrack iptable_mangle nf_conntrack_ftp xt_LOG xt_limit xt_multiport iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 iptable_filter vfat fat isofs xfs libcrc32c loop sb_edac edac_core coretemp intel_rapl iosf_mbi crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel lrw gf128mul glue_helper ablk_hel...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=852 Summary: IPv6 TEE target sends packets to original IP address on wrong network device Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: unknown

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86650 Bug ID: 86650 Summary: (NV44): initrd gpu lockup from 3.12 or 3.13 onwards Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee:

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, > with the one config file change) working for everyone: > > (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) Hello. Maybe it's not the most appropriate thread or time, but I have been signalling it before: 4.9.* kernels do not work well for me any more (and for other people

...reference at 0000000000000008 [56953.400946] IP: [<ffffffffa0426b19>] nouveau_fence_wait_uevent.isra.5+0x19/0x450 [nouveau] [56953.400984] PGD d1cf2067 PUD d2ac8067 PMD 0 [56953.400998] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [56953.401010] Modules linked in: xt_CHECKSUM ipt_rpfilter xt_statistic xt_CT xt_LOG xt_connlimit xt_realm xt_addrtype xt_comment xt_recent xt_nat ipt_ULOG ipt_REJECT ipt_MASQUERADE ipt_ECN ipt_ah xt_set ip_set nf_nat_tftp nf_nat_sip nf_nat_pptp nf_nat_proto_gre nf_nat_irc nf_nat_h323 nf_nat_ftp nf_nat_amanda ts_kmp nf_conntrack_amanda nf_conntrack_sane nf_conntrack_tftp nf_conntra...