Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "xstate_nonlazi".
Did you mean:
xstate_nonlazy
2013 Nov 19
6
[PATCH 2/5] X86 architecture instruction set extension definiation
From eee3a3d3072651327453220876ebe9a7345d6ffe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:44:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] X86 architecture instruction set extension definiation
Intel has released new version of Intel Architecture Instruction Set
Extensions Programming Reference, add new features like AVX-512, MPX, etc.
refer
2013 Nov 25
0
[PATCH 2/4 V2] X86: enable support for new ISA extensions
From a06ea5f6960b7bfa473f5d56762ce3a06b0a2b07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 01:13:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/4 V2] X86: enable support for new ISA extensions
Intel has released new version of Intel Architecture Instruction Set
Extensions Programming Reference, adding new features like AVX-512,
MPX, etc. Refer to
2013 Jun 04
12
[PATCH 0/4] XSA-52..54 follow-up
The first patch really isn''t as much of a follow-up than what triggered
the security issues to be noticed in the first place.
1: x86: preserve FPU selectors for 32-bit guest code
2: x86: fix XCR0 handling
3: x86/xsave: adjust state management
4: x86/fxsave: bring in line with recent xsave adjustments
The first two I would see as candidates for 4.3 (as well as
subsequent backporting,