Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "xrhx".
Did you mean:
rhx
2014 Nov 27
0
2.2.15: SMTP submission server?
...32axgPy1pZIE2VS4mgFPjBKm3fYDSZMM34NqbNGy+v7vrq
FNHDLjTOUusYrXcU57TWWdA8uOBLcfrWemLcnlq75ziELqEBqOtrBpfuYVdN9DB8
927V6Q5To5rTLvul3ZzK+V0YSUu7fkXl9sgHUYpbbtyengUVDYDSL+tQUGhYT5ob
Mc/KDP5ZNek956etjMWgrCl1XbMKJdRRi6ZWvdVU7+W8aQkrXErdRp69fgRMTwk2
TNWD+9gN5XMBjZL/ZTIDz2Pi70gQaKDVGeyXD0ALUAmJpIFBoGwrlw==
=XrHX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2014 Nov 26
3
2.2.15: SMTP submission server?
On 17/11/2014 07:23, Ron Leach wrote:
> On 16/11/2014 07:24, Robert Schetterer wrote (re-ordered):
>> Am 16.11.2014 um 02:24 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>
>>> * if you find a security issue in postfix running
>>> on 587 over TLS cry out loud
>
> I'm thinking beyond that; I want to get to the position that when
> there is an issue in the MTA, our