search for: xplor

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "xplor".

Did you mean: explor
2009 Jan 25
2
[LLVMdev] -O4 -fvisibility=hidden
After trying the recommended use of -O4 -fvisibility=hidden to compile xplor-nih with full LTO optimizations, I discovered three symbols become undefined... llvm-gcc-4 -O4 -fvisibility=hidden -o xplor xplor.o \ \ -L. -lxplorCmd -lxplor -L/Users/howarth/xplor-nih-2.21/bin.Darwin_9_x86/ -lfft -lintVar -lvmd -lpy -lswigpy-xplor -ltclXplor -lswigtcl8-xplor -lnmrPot -lc...
2009 Jan 24
1
[LLVMdev] -O4 limitations in llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 2.5?
What exactly are the current limitations for using -O4 to create shared libraries with llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 2.5? I tried a build of xplor-nih at -O4 with llvm-gcc, llvm-g++ and llvm-gfortran. The build fails to link shared libraries with errors such as... Building xplor-nih for platform: Darwin_9_x86 [ -d /Users/howarth/xplor-nih-2.21/bin.Darwin_9_x86/ ] || mkdir /Users/howarth/xplor-nih-2.21/bin.Darwin_9_x86/ touch /Users/howarth/...
2009 Jan 25
0
[LLVMdev] -O4 -fvisibility=hidden
Le 25 janv. 09 à 06:01, Jack Howarth a écrit : > After trying the recommended use of -O4 -fvisibility=hidden to > compile xplor-nih with full LTO optimizations, I discovered three > symbols become undefined... > > llvm-gcc-4 -O4 -fvisibility=hidden -o xplor xplor.o \ > \ > -L. -lxplorCmd -lxplor -L/Users/howarth/xplor-nih-2.21/ > bin.Darwin_9_x86/ -lfft -lintVar -lvmd -lpy -lswigpy-xplor - > l...
2011 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] major dragonegg improvement
I'm not certain yet which commit in the last couple of days caused this, but the current llvm/dragonegg svn shows a major improvement in the runtime of the xplor-nih testsuite when xplor-nih is built with FSF gcc 4.6.1 and the dragonegg plugin at -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops. Previously the xplor-nih testsuite always executed in ~40 sec but now it is coming it at 34.5 sec which is about the same result seen for xplor-nih built with native FSF gcc 4.6.1....
2011 Sep 02
1
[LLVMdev] does new EH require newer linker?
Is the new EH scheme completely compatible with the existing linker in Xcode 4.1? I am finding that today's changes break the ability to link xplor-nih with dragonegg under FSF gcc 4.6.2... de-g++46 -c thread.cc -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -g -DX_MMAP_FLAGS=0 -DFORTRAN_INIT -fno-common -DDARWIN -D_REENTRANT -DNDEBUG -I/Users/howarth/xplor-nih-2.27/vmd/ -I/Users/howarth/xplor-nih-2.27/arch/Darwin_11_x86_64/include -I/Users/howarth/xplor-...
2009 Jan 23
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 and xplor-nih
I am happy to report that current llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 svn builds all of xplor-nih (a complex mix of c, c++ and fortran) with -O3 -fPIC -msse4 -ffast-math. A single fortran file exposes PR3376 which is triggered by -O3 -ffinite-math-only. The resulting build of xplor-nih completely passes its testsuite and compares very well to the same build against gcc trunk for gcc 4.4 in...
2011 Apr 13
1
[LLVMdev] dragonegg vs xplor-nih
I was quite surprised to find that dragonegg svn can now compile all of xplor-nih (which is a complex mix of c, c++ and fortran that is a regression magnet for FSF gcc). The xplor-nih package was compiled at -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops for all three compilers. The xplor testsuite passed without regressions and benchmarked as follows... dragonegg svn with llvm 2.9 and FS...
2011 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] major dragonegg improvement
...ry likely to be related to Andy's SCEV-unroll-loops changes. --Owen On Sep 6, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > I'm not certain yet which commit in the last couple of days caused this, > but the current llvm/dragonegg svn shows a major improvement in the runtime > of the xplor-nih testsuite when xplor-nih is built with FSF gcc 4.6.1 and the > dragonegg plugin at -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops. Previously the xplor-nih > testsuite always executed in ~40 sec but now it is coming it at 34.5 sec which > is about the same result seen for xplor-nih built with native...
2009 Jan 25
2
[LLVMdev] -O4 -fvisibility=hidden
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:38:48AM +0100, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > Le 25 janv. 09 à 06:01, Jack Howarth a écrit : > > > After trying the recommended use of -O4 -fvisibility=hidden to > > compile xplor-nih with full LTO optimizations, I discovered three > > symbols become undefined... > > > > llvm-gcc-4 -O4 -fvisibility=hidden -o xplor xplor.o \ > > \ > > -L. -lxplorCmd -lxplor -L/Users/howarth/xplor-nih-2.21/ > > bin.Darwin_9_x86/ -lfft -lintVar -lvmd...
2011 Sep 06
1
[LLVMdev] major dragonegg improvement
...s SCEV-unroll-loops changes. > > --Owen > > On Sep 6, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> I'm not certain yet which commit in the last couple of days caused this, >> but the current llvm/dragonegg svn shows a major improvement in the runtime >> of the xplor-nih testsuite when xplor-nih is built with FSF gcc 4.6.1 and the >> dragonegg plugin at -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops. Previously the xplor-nih >> testsuite always executed in ~40 sec but now it is coming it at 34.5 sec which >> is about the same result seen for xplor-nih built w...
2009 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] -O4 limitations in llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 2.5?
Chris, Thanks for the hint. Moving over the libLTO.dylib from llvm 2.5 solved all of the linkage errors. I was able to completely build xplor-nih at -O4 now. The core xplor and xplor-tcl testsuite show no regressions. I do get 7 testcases in the xplor-python testsuite failing with bus errors now. The xplor-tcl and xplor-python tests are all run by tcl and python respectively loading their xplor-nih modules. I would assume that the shared...