search for: xori

Full_Name: Jelle Goeman Version: 1.9.0 OS: mingw32, windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (145.88.209.33) Hi Everyone, I get very strange results using the function hasArg with the ... function argument. In my own function: > gt <- globaltest(X,Y) > sampling(gt) works fine, but > sampling(globaltest(X,Y)) results in: Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : "missing"

Hello, I got an error message saying Error in lognet(x, is.sparse, ix, jx, y, weights, offset, alpha, nobs, : NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 5) when I try to analysis a binary trait using glmnet(R) by running the following code library(glmnet) Xori <- read.table("c:\\SNP.txt", sep='\t'); Yori <- read.table("c:\\Trait.txt", sep=','); Y=as.matrix(Yori); X=t(as.matrix(Xori)); fit1=glmnet(X, Y, family="binomial"); in the above, X is a matrix with values 1, 0, and -1; Y is a one column matrix wi...

...; r352240 | asb | 2019-01-25 13:06:47 -0800 (Fri, 25 Jan 2019) | 7 lines > [RISCV] Add another potential combine to {double,float}-bitmanip-dagcombines.ll > > r352237 | apazos | 2019-01-25 12:22:49 -0800 (Fri, 25 Jan 2019) | 3 lines > Reapply: [RISCV] Set isAsCheapAsAMove for ADDI, ORI, XORI, LUI > > r352211 | asb | 2019-01-25 08:04:04 -0800 (Fri, 25 Jan 2019) | 6 lines > [RISCV][NFC] s/f32/f64 in double-arith.ll > > r352199 | asb | 2019-01-25 06:33:08 -0800 (Fri, 25 Jan 2019) | 8 lines > [RISCV] Add tests to demonstrate bitcasted fneg/fabs dagcombines > > r3520...

...ERO, imm:$in)>; def : MipsPat<(i32 immLow16Zero:$in), (LUi (HI16 imm:$in))>; Here are some which have several instructions multiclass SetgePats<RegisterClass RC, Instruction SLTOp, Instruction SLTuOp> { def : MipsPat<(setge RC:$lhs, RC:$rhs), (XORi (SLTOp RC:$lhs, RC:$rhs), 1)>; def : MipsPat<(setuge RC:$lhs, RC:$rhs), (XORi (SLTuOp RC:$lhs, RC:$rhs), 1)>; } On 07/20/2012 07:20 AM, Geraint Yang wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > We are trying to implement a simple Mips-based CPU with just for > tea...

Thanks for your reply. We are trying to implement a simple Mips-based CPU with just for teaching purpose, so we delete some instructions which are not commonly used, thus the task won't be too hard for students. I am responsible for modifying the compiler so that the compiler won't emit unsupported instructions. In order to avoid "can not select" error, I am trying to expand

...m), (ADDIS (ADDI GPRC:$in, (LO16 imm:$imm)), (HA16 imm:$imm))>; // OR an arbitrary immediate. def : Pat<(or GPRC:$in, imm:$imm), (ORIS (ORI GPRC:$in, (LO16 imm:$imm)), (HI16 imm:$imm))>; // XOR an arbitrary immediate. def : Pat<(xor GPRC:$in, imm:$imm), (XORIS (XORI GPRC:$in, (LO16 imm:$imm)), (HI16 imm:$imm))>; -Chris

Are there any examples of using tablegen to generate multiple machine instructions from a single pattern? Or do these cases always have to be manually expanded? -Dave

in llvm-3.6.2.src 1. when I put this around one of my instruction definitions in my target "InstrInfo.td" file, let TwoOperandAliasConstraint = "$dst = $rs1" in { } I do not see any TIED_TO in the generated GenInstrInfo.inc file for the OperandInfo used by the instruction, the question is what am I doing wrong ? 2. I've noticed that TwoOperandAliasConstraint

Dear testers, 8.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r351980). It took a little longer than planned, but it's looking good. Please run the test script, share your results, and upload binaries. I'll get the source tarballs and docs published as soon as possible, and binaries as they become available. Thanks, Hans

Looking through the archives I have seen talk of making CPU specific optimisations for Vorbis, a la MMX/3DNow!/SSE. The feeling I gather is to wait until something is working well in C before committing to any kind of specific optimisation. What if oft used and needed DSP functions were identified and standardised DSP functionality be written for Vorbis? This would seperate the basically