Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "xmlgraphic".
Did you mean:
xmlgraphics
2016 May 12
2
6.8 CR Packages
...i.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR
Any if you are wondering why not earlier (though, 2 days is pretty fast
if you ask me) ...this timebomb bug rendered both the openssl updates
unbuildable:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335097
There where also a bugs where glutserfs, xmlgraphics-commons, and
certmonger would not build.
The full release of the entire 6.8 tree and isos is still some time
(10-20 days) away, but we should have CR packages soon.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: app...
2012 Nov 16
2
Failed to build libvirt-1.0.0-1.fc17.src.rpm on a CentOS 6.3 system
...2.2.3-1.1.el6.x86_64
xmldb-api-sdk-0.1-0.4.20011111cvs.1.5.el6.noarch
xmlto-0.0.23-3.el6.x86_64
xmlrpc-c-1.16.24-1209.1840.el6.x86_64
xml-commons-resolver-1.1-4.18.el6.x86_64
xmlrpc-c-client-1.16.24-1209.1840.el6.x86_64
xmldb-api-0.1-0.4.20011111cvs.1.5.el6.noarch
xmlrpc3-client-3.0-4.15.el6.noarch
xmlgraphics-commons-1.3.1-1.1.el6.noarch
libxml2-devel-2.7.6-4.el6_2.4.x86_64
libxml2-2.7.6-4.el6_2.4.x86_64
xml-common-0.6.3-32.el6.noarch
perl-libxml-perl-0.08-10.el6.noarch
libxml2-python-2.7.6-4.el6_2.4.x86_64
xml-commons-apis-1.3.04-3.6.el6.x86_64
# cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64...
2016 May 12
0
6.8 CR Packages
...ories/CR
>
> Any if you are wondering why not earlier (though, 2 days is pretty fast
> if you ask me) ...this timebomb bug rendered both the openssl updates
> unbuildable:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335097
>
> There where also a bugs where glutserfs, xmlgraphics-commons, and
> certmonger would not build.
>
> The full release of the entire 6.8 tree and isos is still some time
> (10-20 days) away, but we should have CR packages soon.
Thank you Johnny and all others from CentOS. Great effort!
--
LF
2019 Sep 26
2
[PROVENANCE INTERNET] Re: Missing packages in centos8 mirrors or do I miss something?
For those who come across this thread, I've found the exact list of changed and dropped package between rhel:7 and rhel:8:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html-single/considerations_in_adopting_rhel_8/index#package-replacements_changes-to-packages
Too bad that the "note" column is empty in the dropped package table. NO word about reason or