search for: xlims

I'm looking for an R mentor. I want to propose a change in management of plot options xlim and ylim. Did you ever want to change one coordinate in xlim or ylim? It happens to me all the time. x <- rnorm(100, m=5, s=1) y <- rnorm(100, m=6, s=1) plot(x,y) ## Oh, I want the "y axis" to show above x=0. plot(x,y, xlim=c(0, )) ##Output: Error in c(0, ) : argument 2 is empty

Full_Name: Steve Ellison Version: 2.4.1 OS: Windows, Linux Submission from: (NULL) (194.73.101.157) bxp() allows specifcation of box locations with at=, but neither adjusts xlim= to fit at nor does it respect xlim provided explicitly. This is because bxp() now includes explicit xlim as c(0.5, n+0.5), without checking for explicitly supplied xlim (or ylim if horizontal). This also prevents

Dear R-developers, A student asked me today of how to specify the limits of the x-axis. I knew that he should use xlim, but I tried to encourage him to have a try himself with the various help functions. I do not judge if he used the correct search strategy or right key words, but anyway here is what he tried: he looked at ?plot. There xlim is not mentioned. He checked ?par. There you find

symbols(iris[,1],iris[,2],rectangles=as.matrix(iris[,3:4]),inches=0.3, ylim=c(1,5)) Error in plot.default(NA, NA, type = "n", ylim = ylim, xlim = xlim, xlab = xlab, : formal argument "ylim" matched by multiple actual arguments Since plot is called inside symbols, with specified xlim and ylim, any specification through ,... hurts this call. I am pretty sure that you

list(...), I would like to zoom in to the leaves of large trees in a dendrogram plot. The playwith package allows zooming by passing xlim and ylim arguments to the plot call (Hmisc does this too I think). But currently stats:::plot.dendrogram does not accept xlim or ylim. So I would like to enable that. In place of the existing code chunk: xlim <- c(x1 - 1/2, x2 + 1/2) ylim <- c(0,

Hello, I want to plot 21 scatter plots in a 7*3 matrix on a single A4 page (using mfcol). Below is an example, which -by and large- looks very close to the desired result. But I do not get it to fill out the whole page. If I specify the a different page size, the plots still do not fill out the whole page. Anybody an idea what to do? Maybe adjusting indvidiual plot size (if so, how?). Or is there

Dear R-core team, I think I found a small inconsistency in the boxplot function. I don't want to post it as a bug since I'm not sure this might be considered as one according to the FAQ --- and this is not a major problem. Don't hesitate to tell me if I'm wrong. If you try to do a boxplot on a matrix and set the "at" argument to some vector different from 1:n, n is the

Hi, I'm trying to follow the suggestions given by Deepayan Sarkar in this message: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/05/11/16135.html to plot 3-D points on a wireframe plot. The problem is that I keep getting a partly formed plot- with the colored lattice visible but no axis labels or additional points- with the error message "error using packet 1, 'x' and 'units'

Full_Name: Yasuhiro Nakajima Version: 2.6.1 OS: WinXP SP2 Submission from: (NULL) (202.237.255.13) Dear all, I noticed the following behaviour of ci.plot in HH Package(ver.2.1-9): > library(HH) > data(women, package="datasets") > attach(women) > ft <- lm(height~weight) > windows() > ci.plot(ft,conf.level=0.95) > windows() > ci.plot(ft,conf.level=0.999) I

Hello all, I’m trying to add some data points to a wireframe. X an Y axis are independent variables, Z axis is predicted probability. I’d like to add the original data points on which the predicted probabilities are based to the wireframe. I’ve followed some of the previous post on this but get stuck : ## first part yields the wireframe## setwd("C:/Temp") rnp <-

Hi, Still fresh in R, tried to figure this out, now on my second day running with no luck (and a pile of hair on my desk) so I have thrown in the towel and would like to ask for some help. Here is what I am trying to do. I am trying to plot a distribution, I have 99 points, bound in the range xlim.min: -0.0173 xlim.max: 0.02103 However, I have a value outside this range (0.2454959) which I

Dear R-helpers, I wish to place some text in a plot, at approx 10% of my upper xlim and approx 90% of my upper ylim, i.e. > plot(log(all$SR,10)~log(all$AREA,10)) > text(.1*max(xlim),.9*max(ylim),"text to be placed") (I know how to give absolute coordinates for text location, but I wish to use relative coordinates). My code (above) doesn't work because I don't know how

I'd like to make a plot with the axes drawn at the values of xlim and ylim. The default plot draws the axes slightly outside these values. I have been experimenting with the par(mgp) setting, but specifying par(mgp=c(2,0,-1)) gives me "invalid value specified for graphics parameter "mgp".". A more complicated mathod that almost seems to work is doing the plot with

I received a warning about incompatible methods that I don't understand. The workaround in this example is simple. What is the reason that these methods are seen as incompatible? Is there some dangerous consequence of my as.numeric() workaround? Can a fix to the code base, perhaps similar to my workaround, make this warning no longer necessary? I am using R 2.7.0 on Windows. version.string R

Dear plotting wizards, when plotting in R, the actual lengths of the axes are slightly greater than the ranges of the x/y variables or xlim/ylim values. how do I control the amount by which the axes are enlarged? Is there a way to enforce that the lengths of the axes equal xlim/ylim? example: plot(0:100,0:100,pch="+") it can be observed, that the x- and y-axis join at approx.

Dear R developer, I am not quite sure, if I should post my concern as a wish to r-bugs at r-project.org. Thus, as recommended, I first send an email to you. My request is the following: I would appreciate, if it was possible to obtain a plot of a 'stepfun' with a strict interpretation of xlim. What I mean: sf <- stepfun(1:4, 1:5) plot(sf, xlim=c(0,10)) does not bound the function to

Please see this code for a demonstration of my problem... xlim <- c(-1,5) plot(1:4, xlim=xlim) abline(v=xlim[1]) abline(v=xlim[2]) When I refer to xlim, it is not referring to the boundaries of the graphical region, it refers to the maximum and minimum xticks. My question is how can I refer to the x axis boundaries (and similarly y axis) of the graph? -- View this message in context:

Hi is there an alternative to par(new), for ading data to a plot for a different y-axis? My problem with par(new=TRUE) is, that it re-defines all axis and labels (as in example 1) and one has to use xlim=... to fix the x-axis. I am looking for something, which simply resets the y-axis, so that a new plot() (or points()/lines()) keeps the x-axis, but re-defines the y-axis. Is there something

Hello, I have found that in smoothScatter it is not possible to reverse the axes plotted (R version 2.9.0) .   It appears that this arises from the hard coding of xlim and ylim in smoothscatter.R in the lines : x <- x[ xlim[1] <= x[,1] & x[,1] <=xlim[2], ]   (line  number 25) and x <- x[ ylim[1] <= x[,2] & x[,2] <= ylim[2], ]  (line number 31) This results in a x

Hi there, I get a strange behaviour of a boxplot with the following code. There seems to be a problem with the xlim-parameter. Did I do anything wrong? What else can I do to force the boxplot to have a defined x-range? x <- rnorm(100) boxplot(x, notch=TRUE, xlab=parameter, xlim <- c(-4,4), horizontal = TRUE) Antje