search for: xidnumbers

...t; cn: S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-2101 > objectClass: sidMap > objectSid: S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-2101 > type: ID_TYPE_BOTH > xidNumber: 3000046 > distinguishedName: CN=S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-2101 > > Check for duplicate 'xidNumbers' > Also, as you say the other DC died (or is that fried ?), check the FSMO > roles and ensure there is no mention of the dead DC in sam.ldb (you may > have to use '--cross-ncs' & -show-binary' with ldbsearch or ldbedit) > > Rowland >

...0015 >> >> Is an xid number supposed to go all the way down to 0? >> > > Yes, '0' is administrator (and also root) > '100' is the users group and '65534' is the user 'nobody' > > Only problem I can see, you do not have any duplicate xidNumbers, but > that doesn't mean you don't have any SIDs with more than one xidNumber > > Rowland >

I have a brand-new install of Debian 8 without systemd and a freshly-built Samba 4 install with issues. I created this as a standalone AD DC, setup group policies, etc and then took it to the client location. Now nothing works. I keep getting "RPC server unavailable" on Windows machines and trying to list shares on the DC itself results in NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. I am lost as there are

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, > except for 300000. Below is an example. > > root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ > total 16 > drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies > drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp

I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, except for 300000. Below is an example. root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ total 16 drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 scripts root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/Policies total 16 drwxrws---+ 5 MEDARTS\reachfp

Hi everyone The s4 Domain Users group has xidNumber: 100 and the Linux users group has gidNumber=100. I've been mapping xidNumber <--> gidNumber for s4 posix groups I've added myself, but this causes a name collision for Domain Users. This also has implications on Linux as local users have access to the group owned stuff of Domain users. I've changed the xidNumber in

Wait, now I'm confused. Idmap lines do not need to be set up on the DCs? Then how does windows figure's out the ids in the Unix Attributes tab? I thought you needed both rfc2307 and idmap on the DC and the members. Em 27/10/2016 05:39, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400 > Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >

Rowland, Thank you for the quick response. I have just run net cache flush no change in problem. I have dumped the idmap.ldp using ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb > idmap.txt and did some sorting, that is how I found the duplicates. On 1/13/2017 11:09 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > samba-tool ntacl > >sysvolreset

Rowland, no domain user can authenticate on any system and running sysvolreset followed by sysvolcheck results in a crash. If the sysvol permissions are correct, sysvolcheck does not crash. If I attempt to join a NAS or workstation to the domain I get NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. Researching these symptoms turns up a thread about a corrupt idmap.ldb where a group SID and user SID may be the same or

Hi Samba team ! I have some conflicts between uid stored in the rfc2307 attributes and some local uid from idmap.ldb My network : ------------------ I have three samba AD DC with sysvol replication. Sadly, as I don't have some other machines, the three DC also share my user's Home and Profile directories. So I need at least : -> Builtin User/Group ID mapping between DCs (easy) ->

Greetings, All! I've discovered a nasty mismatch in my recently upgraded domain. It seems that a number of builtin groups have mappings in idmap.ldb that overlap with posixAccount mappings in the sam.ldb. Namely, # file: var/lib/samba/sysvol/ads.example.com/scripts/ # owner: root # group: 544 user::rwx user:root:rwx group::rwx group:544:rwx group:30000:r-x group:30001:rwx

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Doh, I missed that, well spotted Steve. > > Do not alter idmap.ldb, leave it alone, use RFC2307 attributes where > possible and join my campaign to get winbindd to pull all the attributes :-D > So, the xidNumber isn't needed? I'm going to be use SSSD for local auth,

On 01/12/14 17:46, steve wrote: > On 01/12/14 18:25, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 01/12/14 17:16, steve wrote: >>> On 01/12/14 18:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 01/12/14 17:09, steve wrote: >>>>> On 01/12/14 17:31, Greg Zartman wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Rowland Penny >>>>>> <rowlandpenny at

Hello Samba team, I have 3 production samba DCs version 4.5.1 serving the same domain (2 sites) and all are having the same problems, I believe based on two duplicate xidNumbers described below. xidNumbers 3000002 & 3000003 have two SIDs assigned while xidNumbers 3000011 & 3000012 have no SIDs assigned. Is fixing this as simple as moving one of the duplicates to the empty xidNumber and if so how can I safely accomplish the move? Details below. Thank you in adva...

...specified > >> in the smb.conf for member servers. That's why I still don't see > >> how it is related to a AD DC use case. I take it I'm missing > >> something crucial here. > > A Samba AD DC uses idmap.ldb by default, this means that you get > > xidNumbers in the '3000000' range, but if you use the 'ad' backend > > on Unix domain members, these xidNumbers get overridden by the > > uidNumber's and gidNumber's set in AD. It also turns some groups > > from being both users and groups into just groups. > >...

On 04/11/2020 00:14, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > Hmm, you say 'uidNumber' but I have xidNumber: > # editing 1 records > # record 1 > dn: CN=S-1-5-21-1638907138-195301586-368347949-3088 > cn: S-1-5-21-1638907138-195301586-368347949-3088 > objectClass: sidMap > objectSid: S-1-5-21-1638907138-195301586-368347949-3088 > type: ID_TYPE_BOTH > xidNumber: 1044 >

On 01/12/14 17:16, steve wrote: > On 01/12/14 18:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 01/12/14 17:09, steve wrote: >>> On 01/12/14 17:31, Greg Zartman wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Rowland Penny >>>> <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I do what windows does,

On 01/12/14 18:23, steve wrote: > On 01/12/14 19:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 01/12/14 17:46, steve wrote: >>> On 01/12/14 18:25, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 01/12/14 17:16, steve wrote: >>>>> On 01/12/14 18:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>>> On 01/12/14 17:09, steve wrote: >>>>>>> On 01/12/14 17:31, Greg Zartman

...have duplicates, but I would try this instead. Stop Samba, >>>>> backup idmap.ldb and then delete both duplicates and any other >>>>> records that don't match the above sample, then restart Samba, >>>>> this should recreate the records, but with new xidNumbers. >>>>> >>>>> Run 'net cache flush' and sysvolreset again. >>>>> >>>>> Rowland >>>>> >>>> I tried two ways but it didn't seem to help, >>>> >>>> First stopped Samba, backed up i...

...backend only needs to be specified in >> the smb.conf for member servers. That's why I still don't see how it >> is related to a AD DC use case. I take it I'm missing something >> crucial here. > A Samba AD DC uses idmap.ldb by default, this means that you get > xidNumbers in the '3000000' range, but if you use the 'ad' backend on > Unix domain members, these xidNumbers get overridden by the uidNumber's > and gidNumber's set in AD. It also turns some groups from being both > users and groups into just groups. > Can you just help me...