search for: xiangli

OK, Let me describe. There is nothing wrong with if-conversion in LLVM. The algorithm implemented in LLVM can handle the if(???){do something} and if(???){do something}else{do something else} case very well. But it can handle complicated case like when there are a lot of gotos in the program. The more systematic way to do if-conversion is based on Hyperblock [Scott A. Mahlke et al 1992]

Hi, Are you guys interested in implementing if-conversion as a GSoC 2015 project? Last year, I did a literature review about approaches of if-conversion and the if-conversion in LLVM. This was the undergraduate thesis of my bachelor degree. It seems that, the if-conversion used in LLVM is a very simple approach instead of following the literature. So I want to implement the approaches in the

Full_Name: Xiang Li Version: 2.01 OS: WinXP Submission from: (NULL) (128.248.174.125) I am trying to use the font of "TT Courier New: bold" to get the equal size of letters. The "TT Courier New: bold" is the 11th font listed in the Rdevga file. You can just try a simple case: plot(1:10, 1:10, xlab = "XILMV", font.lab = 11) I save the plot in postscript format,

Is there a function in R that could find the significant digit of a specific number? Such as for 3.1415, return '5'? Thanks in advance. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I have just noticed the following problem with R2.1.0 running on SuSE 9.1, [However, version 2.0.1 (2004-11-15) on the same machine works Okay]: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > hist(rnorm(100)) Error in title(main = main, sub = sub, xlab = xlab, ylab = ylab, ...) : X11 font at size 14 could not be loaded > version _

Hi, Urgent help- I have not been using R and statistics in my research for a long time, but still remember some concept. I would like to have a sample code for Manova analysis of Split-plot experiment. Could someone please post a sample code and a short input sample as well? Thank you so much! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi Rich, Does that means that all the functions provided by virt-resize will be migrated to virt-builder? Does the command virt-resize will totally be abandoned? We may need to modify all the virt-resize test cases if so. -- Thanks & Best regards, Chen Xiang Hua Raycom office Beijing (NAY), Red Hat Inc. Red Hat Telephony: 86 10 62608040 internal extension: 8388040 Team: Virt QE IRC:

Hi, Please suggest a method to answer below questions: Factory_ID Factory_Location Factory_Size Total_Sample Good_Sample Fair_Sample Bad_Sample ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 City_A

Hi Al, On 2023/3/10 11:15, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 11:21:23PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote: >> Use i_blockmask() to simplify code. > > Umm... What's the branchpoint for that series? Not the mainline - > there we have i_blocksize() open-coded... Actually Yue Hu sent out a clean-up patch and I applied to -next for almost a week and will be upstreamed for

Hi I am working on a Nested one-way ANOVA. I don't know how to implement R code to test the significance of the random factor My R code so far can only test the fixed factor : anova(lme(PCB~Area,random=~1|Sites, data = PCBdata)) numDF denDF F-value p-value (Intercept) 1 12 1841.7845 <.0001 Area 1 4 4.9846 0.0894 Here is my data and my hand

Hi Gao Xiang, > Please help drop this one since we'd like to use it until i_blockmask() lands to upstream. I'm OK. Not sure if I need to resend v5? Thx, Yangtao

On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 11:21:23PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote: > Use i_blockmask() to simplify code. Umm... What's the branchpoint for that series? Not the mainline - there we have i_blocksize() open-coded... > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li at vivo.com> > --- > v3: > -none > v2: > -convert to i_blockmask() > fs/erofs/data.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1

On 2019/9/24 ??3:21, Ding Xiang wrote: > platform_get_irq already contains error message, Is this message contained in all possible error path? If not, it's probably better to keep it as is. Thanks > so remove > the redundant dev_err message > > Signed-off-by: Ding Xiang <dingxiang at cmss.chinamobile.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 4 +--- >

Use a 64px icon which is in the menu-icons-default package, hopefully part of the default installation of any flavour. Updates commit 9928296c1ca8df5bd8f108ed00039adc6468cac3. Thanks to: Xiang Hua Chen. --- lib/inspect-icon.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/inspect-icon.c b/lib/inspect-icon.c index 84d4e4a..695f038 100644 --- a/lib/inspect-icon.c +++

The message from this sender included one or more files which could not be scanned for virus detection; do not open these files unless you are certain of the sender's intent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Yangtao, On 2023/3/10 13:48, Yangtao Li wrote: > Use i_blockmask() to simplify code. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li at

Also, I am wondering if there is any source where the expressions of many symbols are collected. Thanks you very much!!! Li, Xiang(Sean)

Dear R-helper, Please suggest some methods for my question below. We measured the amount of protein A in patient blood in pre-treatment and post-treatment condition from 32 patients. -------------------------------------------- Pre-treatment Post-treatment Pat1 25 28 Pat2 19 15 Pat3 94

Dear R listers, I have a data file looks like the following: Testing marker: s_1 --------------------------------------------- Allele df(0) -LnLk(0) df(T) -LnLk(T) ChiSq p 3 7995 29320.30 7994 29311.85 16.90 4e-05 (2229/8000 probands) Testing marker: s_2 --------------------------------------------- Allele df(0)

hello, does anyone know how to add histograms or distributions on regression like just like quantiles regression in RGraphGallery below, a very delicate codes. Thanks alot. http://addictedtor.free.fr/graphiques/RGraphGallery.php?graph=109

Hi Xiang, On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 1:59 AM Zhang, Xiang1 <xiang1.zhang at intel.com> wrote: > Jeremy wrote: > > ... The value %0 is live up to and including the ADD64ri but not past it, meaning LLVM today will drop the DBG_VALUE ... > > Just a little puzzle about the " drop the DBG_VALUE ", maybe I didn't get your key point, >