search for: xftrm

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "xftrm".

Did you mean: xform
2024 Jul 14
1
xftrm is more than 100x slower for AsIs than for character vectors
Dear Ivan, thanks for the confirmation and the proposed patch. I just wanted to add some notes regarding the relevance of this: base::merge using by.x=0 or by.y=0 (i.e. matching on row.names) will automatically add a column Row.names which is I(row.names(x)) to the corresponding input table (using I() since revision 39026 to avoid conversion of character to factor). When this column is used
2024 Jul 16
1
I() in merge (was: Re: xftrm is more than 100x slower for AsIs than for character vectors)
Dear all, actually, it is not clear to me why there is still a protection of the added Row.names column in merge using I(). This seems to stem from a time when R would automatically convert character vectors to factor in data.frame on insert. However, I can't reproduce this behaviour even in data.frames generated with stringsAsFactors = T in current versions of R. Maybe the I() inserted in r
2024 Jul 12
1
xftrm is more than 100x slower for AsIs than for character vectors
Good evening, I recently have observed slow merges when combining multiple data frames derived from DataFrame and base::data.frame. I observed that the index column of intermediate tables was of class <AsIs> (automatically converted from character). The problem occurred mainly when using the sorted = T option in base::merge. This can be traced to xtfrm.AsIs being more than 100 times slower
2024 Jul 14
2
xftrm is more than 100x slower for AsIs than for character vectors
? Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:35:19 +0200 Hilmar Berger via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> ?????: > This can be finally traced to base::rank() (called from > xtfrm.default), where I found that > > "NB: rank is not itself generic but xtfrm is, and rank(xtfrm(x), ....) > will have the desired result if there is a xtfrm method. Otherwise, > rank will make use of ==, >,