Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "xenonium".
2014 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] LLD's software architecture (update)
Yes, but if you look in LayoutPasses.c, it calls
registry.referenceKindToString(..),
so it does need the definition..
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <mailing at xenonium.com>
wrote:
> Using forward-declaration would not fix the layer violation.
>
> Le 10 juil. 2014 à 13:10, Bas van den Berg <b.van.den.berg.nl at gmail.com>
> a écrit :
>
> Well, it does have a Registry& that's defined in Reader.h.
> But that can be forward decl...
2018 Nov 20
2
[cfe-dev] llvm.org pre-built clang significantly slower than apple/xcode clang
I don’t think Apple disable assertion on the release build. I remember having clang and llvm crash because of assertion failure regularly at some point in the past.
Nowadays, it is far more unusual to get a clang crash, so I can’t tell, but I doubt they change the configuration.
> Le 20 nov. 2018 à 16:32, Jack Howarth via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> a écrit :
>
> The
2014 Apr 08
2
[LLVMdev] C++ 11 explicit keyword error
Hi,
I’m on Mac OS X 10.9.2 with all last updates; if I have this source:
class xxx explicit
{
};
int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
return 0;
}
and I compile it with clang++ -std=c++11 -Wall -pedantic -c I obtain this error:
nn:1: error: expected unqualified-id
{
^
1 error generated.
But the C++ 11 standard permits explicit on classes.
It’s a bug?
-------------- next part
2014 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] LLD's software architecture (update)
Well, it does have a Registry& that's defined in Reader.h.
But that can be forward declared (and apparently is in some
of the other headers it includes.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Andreas Wendleder <
andreas.wendleder at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> - passes depend on Reader and Writer
>>
>
> That's an easy one. Compile tested on Windows with
2014 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Weekly - #46, Nov 17th 2014
LLVM Weekly - #46, Nov 17th 2014
================================
If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at
<http://llvmweekly.org/issue/46>.
Welcome to the forty-sixth issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter
(published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related
projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex
Bradbury](http://asbradbury.org).
2018 Jun 05
2
Mach-O support in lld: what are the known issues?
I'd be interested in the existence of a high-quality, open-source, portable
linker for apple platforms, but not enough to help make that happen.
If I _was_ gonna work on something related to that, I'd probably be
inclined to instead add any required features to allow an ELF linker to
target a notional darwin-elf target, and to have clang emit darwin-elf
object files, and then write a
2017 Jun 14
4
LLD support for mach-o aliases (weak or otherwise)
> On Jun 14, 2017, at 2:47 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 15 Jun 2017, at 6:50 AM, Louis Gerbarg <lgerbarg at apple.com <mailto:lgerbarg at apple.com>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at