search for: xenix

...at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > > My first RH was 5, late nineties. First time I looked at linux and > installed, it was '95, and slack. (We'll ignore the Coherent that I > installed on my beloved 286 in the late 80's). > <snip> You mean you missed all the fun with Xenix on Radio Shack Model 16's and SysV on AT&T's weird 3b machines? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

...DGRAM Serverzone is -7200 1998/10/08 17:37:43 Transaction 0 of length 72 netbios connect: name1=SMBSRVTEST name2=MALOJA Trying username malojA 1998/10/08 17:37:43 Transaction 1 of length 174 switch message SMBnegprot (pid 33822) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] Requested protocol [XENIX CORE] Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 1.03] Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 end of file from client Closing connections 1...

...1 of length 174 [1999/04/14 12:31:15, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(402) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 604) [1999/04/14 12:31:15, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [1999/04/14 12:31:15, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [XENIX CORE] [1999/04/14 12:31:15, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 1.03] [1999/04/14 12:31:15, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] [1999/04/14 12:31:15, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [Windows for Wo...

...I hope to software (hardware!?) mirror - if I'm in for any major fun mirroring a SATA drive do let me know now - I think hardware mirroring is not an option (yet!?) but I haven't checked this out completely. This isn't my first *nix/linux install - I go all the way back to Daisy Dnix, Xenix, SC..er..you know who..unix, via VAX VMS and CP/M on various systems. I have a couple of RH9 boxes that will need updating soon and I'm also running one other Acer G310 server on..er..White Box..(sorry!) so this is kind of a 'keeping my options open' thing! This new G310 will be runnin...

...hard disk. I might be able to find the appropriate BTLD for this, but that won't help migrating existing VMs. + When I tried using 'scsi' libvirtd says this isn't supported. This would be my preferred emulation as we have used SCSI drives since the early days of Xenix on Tandy hardware. + The final problem if these are solved is that SCO is funny about its drive geometry, and the current versions of libvirtd and qemu don't appear to support the <geometry> allowing one to specify heads, cylinders, etc. Am I going to have to resort to...

...type DGRAM |1998/12/01 19:40:41 Transaction 0 of length 72 |netbios connect: name1=PALANDT name2=BP-FS00 |Trying username bp-fs00 |1998/12/01 19:40:41 Transaction 1 of length 174 |switch message SMBnegprot (pid 598) |Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] |Requested protocol [XENIX CORE] |Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 1.03] |Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] |Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] |Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] |Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] |Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] |resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name BP-FS00 |resolve_n...

...93994) [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(439) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(439) Requested protocol [XENIX CORE] [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(439) Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 1.03] [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(439) Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] [2003/06/08 20:49:35, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(439) Requested protocol [Windows for Wo...

I'm sure most people here know about Dash in Debian. Have there been discussions about providing a more efficient shell in Centos for use with heavily invoked non-interactive scripts? With sh being a link to bash in Centos I don't know if it would explode if the link was changed to something else, but at least the scripts we made on our own that run certain services could be changed and

...to [2003/03/08 15:21:43, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(574) Server exit (normal exit) LEVEL 10 LOG: [2003/03/08 15:34:43, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1761) [000] 02 50 43 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 20 50 52 4F 47 .PC NETW ORK PROG [010] 52 41 4D 20 31 2E 30 00 02 58 45 4E 49 58 20 43 RAM 1.0. .XENIX C [020] 4F 52 45 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F 46 54 20 4E ORE..MIC ROSOFT N [030] 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 53 20 31 2E 30 33 00 02 4C 41 ETWORKS 1.03..LA [040] 4E 4D 41 4E 31 2E 30 00 02 57 69 6E 64 6F 77 73 NMAN1.0. .Windows [050] 20 66 6F 72 20 57 6F 72 6B 67 72 6F 75 70 73 20 for Wor kg...

...nes with monitoring, all I have are ones that have absolutely no connection for monitoring. Many years ago, when monitoring just wasn't common yet, I developed a device to attached to a serial port and plug into an unprotected wall outlet and then wrote a C program to run as a daemon on my SCO Xenix systems to check whether that serial port could be opened or not. When the power went out, the device (not being connected to the UPS) would lose power, my program would not be able to open that serial port and the program would wait a couple of minutes (in case the power came back on) and then is...

...:14:34, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(475) smb_bcc=135 [1999/06/20 20:14:34, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2832) [000] 02 50 43 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 20 50 52 4F 47 .PC NETW ORK PROG [1999/06/20 20:14:34, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2840) [010] 52 41 4D 20 31 2E 30 00 02 58 45 4E 49 58 20 43 RAM 1.0. .XENIX C [1999/06/20 20:14:34, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2840) [020] 4F 52 45 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F 46 54 20 4E ORE..MIC ROSOFT N [1999/06/20 20:14:34, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2840) [030] 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 53 20 31 2E 30 33 00 02 4C 41 ETWORKS 1.03..LA [1999/06/20 20:14:34, 10] lib/util.c:du...

...#39;'s validation system puts other database systems to shame. However, the newbies might not know how to write a regexp that excludes a match, instead of tests for it. Understand - I''m just asking this question to help them. I have been using Regexps since ''grep'' on Xenix! But the newbies here might not know how to do this: validates_format_of :field_must_break, :with => /\n/ validates_format_of :field_must_not_break, :with => /^[^\n]$/ The second one fails with data that correctly have no \n linefeed in them. How do I - I mean "they" - negat...

On 6/8/2015 6:29 PM, Peter wrote: > You can thank Fedora for making that rather pointless change and > breaking that capability. that 'capability' was a holdover of the 1980s when disks were measured in megabytes, and memory in kilobytes, so large file systems were impractical. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

I need to write a script that will contact a remote system using TELNET with VT52/1xx/2xx/320 and perform some operations. I am familiar with TELNET but it appears that it won't work for my purposes. TIA, Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE & RHCE American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649 1200 Wooded Acres Dr. Fax:

We run the distro HylaFax on a CentOS-5.4 host. On infrequent occasions we notice that the server will not pick up an incoming call. It reports listening to modem rings. Now, it seems to me that picking up the call should be under the control of the modem but I notice that there exists a setting in Hylafax for the number of rings before picking up. The default value for this is 0 (zero) but we

Hi Mutlu, 2009/8/7 Mutlu T. <cmtunc at gmail.com> > Redirecting to debian.org domain due to being rejected as spam by free.fr > > > ------- Forwarded message ------- > From: "Mutlu T." <cmtunc at gmail.com> > To: arnaud.quette at free.fr > Cc: > Subject: New NUT HCL entry / (brand)Inform (series)Informer Compact > Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:31:04

...1 of length 174 [1999/01/28 09:00:47, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(402) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 692) [1999/01/28 09:00:47, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [1999/01/28 09:00:47, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [XENIX CORE] [1999/01/28 09:00:47, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 1.03] [1999/01/28 09:00:47, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] [1999/01/28 09:00:47, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [Windows for Wo...

...I have, as outlined in docs/ENCRYPTION.txt, to set up an smbpasswd file & using debug I can see the server trying in turn, the different password protocols in response to an NT client connect request, but ultimately failing. e.g. Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] Requested protocol [XENIX CORE] Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 1.03] Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] Requested protocol [LM1.2X002] Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1] Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 ......... Domain=[STAFF] NativeOS=[Windows N...

.... /usr was already assumed to be on the root FS in Solaris, FreeBSD, OS X, and Cygwin well before Fedora made their decision. Fedora?s late to the party, and CentOS necessarily even later. > was tha 8 bit or 17 bit? Unix has never seriously been deployed on 8-bit systems. Even oddballs like Xenix on 8088 and uCLinux on H8/300 are only ?8 bit? because of the external address bus. These are just gimped 16-bit processors, not true 8-bitters. Unix started out on a PDP-7, an 18-bit machine, before moving to a PDP-11/20, which was 16-bit, but much more powerful than the -7. The reduction in wo...

...27607) [2002/03/07 18:56:18, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(313) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/03/07 18:56:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [2002/03/07 18:56:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [XENIX CORE] [2002/03/07 18:56:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 1.03] [2002/03/07 18:56:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] [2002/03/07 18:56:18, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(348) Requested protocol [Windows for Wo...