search for: xenbr0

Hi all, Does anyone know what the correct steps are to add a XEN bridge, let''s say xenbr0 to Debian Squeeze? I have added the following to /etc/network/interfaces # XEN Bridge auto xenbr0 iface xenbr0 inet manual bridge ports eth0 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 And then rebooted the server but brctl show still shows eth0 as bridge: newusaxen:~# brctl...

...external hosts, to the virtual machine, and from the virtual machines to the internet, no problem. But I cannot reach the dom0 from within the domU''s or vice versa. Also the domU''s are able to communicate with each other via that bridge, so forwarding etc is active. brctl show xenbr0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.001871874e9d no vif45.0 vif46.0 eth1...

...e a new vm all works well apart from the networking. If I give DomU a static IP I can''t ping out from the box, Dom0 can''t ping the vm. I''m suspecting it just isn''t seeing the bridge but am unsure where to start looking. This is a very standard setup, 1 bridge: xenbr0 Here''s a config file for a windows guest but I get the same with windows or debian guests. cat windows8.cfg kernel = "/usr/lib/xen-4.0/boot/hvmloader" builder=''hvm'' memory = 4096 vcpus=1 name = "Windows8" vif = [''bridge=xenbr0''] dis...

Hello again, folks! I''m getting one strange problem with FC5 running on XEN 3.0.3 x64... The MRTG point to my machine with XEN running one absurd volume of output data sent (normal is around 6 MB/s) and when XEN is working we get 80 MB/s until my DRAC is alive... after this, the machine crash, DRAC stop do reply, swith stop do work together... Anyone knows whats happening now? ;)

...:9C inet6 addr: fe80::214:4fff:fe2a:129c/64 Scope:Link eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:2A:12:9C inet6 addr: fe80::214:4fff:fe2a:129c/64 Scope:Link vif0.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF inet6 addr: fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 Scope:Link xenbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:2A:12:9C inet addr:132.199.176.78 Bcast:132.199.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 inet6 addr: fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 Scope:Link # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.00144f2a129c...

Just created the first completely new Xen VM with the Virtual Machine Manager after 5.0 became 5.1 and I notice these two differences: - there's now virbr0 instead of xenbr0. Which means I have now xenbr0 and vitbr0 interfaces running. As virbr0 just the new name for xenbr0? If so, can I just change that name in the older configuration files, so that all use the same interface name? - there is a (I think) new option for networking. There's virtual network and...

Somehow I managed to disable the creation of xenbr0 on boot-up of the host system. CentOS 5 with standard CentOS Xen. I changed all Xen VMs to use xenbr0 instead of virbr0 and disabled virtlibd. Works fine. But when I later restarted the machine I found that all networking for guests had gone. On inspection there's no xenbr0 created anymore...

How to check which all network card are part of xenbr0 and what way i can add additional nic on the fly in the xenbr0 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...me the IP address is not correctly assigned. This also happens if I perform "dhcpcd eth0" once I''ve accessed to the guest shell. I don''t know what happens, but it always worked with the previous xen tool stack. I use a bridge for the guest OS networking and it is called xenbr0. This is what I see when dhcpcd starts: * Starting eth0 * Bringing up eth0 * dhcp * Running dhcpcd ...dhcpcd[2226]: version 5.2.10 starting dhcpcd[2226]: eth0: checking for 169.254.86.217 dhcpcd[2226]: eth0: using IPv4LL address 169.254.86.217 dhcpcd[2226]: forked to background, ch...

...indeed it lead me to your door. I need your help, please. My Xen includes 2 guests. Xen itself (10.2.0.52) gets free access to the outside world and to its guests. Both guests however (10.2.0.54/10.2.0.55) see each other but stay under house arrest! Not a single ping manages to go past the bridge (xenbr0) and get an answer from the default gateway (10.2.0.254.) On the guest I keep seeing ''Destination Host Unreachable'', i.e.: #traceroute 10.2.0.254 comes back with the !H message. I have pasted all the info I gathered in attempt to understand who locks the guests in, but will be ha...

...ng is listed here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-04/msg00186.html And I think I have found the reason, why the described problems happen: In a normal xen setup, network looks like this: domU (say ID=1) sees eth0 this eth0 is represented as vif1.0 in dom0 and connected to xenbr0, which goes "out" through peth0 brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no vif0.0 peth0...

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.3.0-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I've just set up a fresh Jessie system using the installer dated 2014-03-05, then installed and enabled Xen 4.3. I've done this quite a few times before using Wheezy and 4.1. I set up xenbr0, then created a test domU using xen-create-image, which completed without issue. However I was unable to start the new domU, getting the error message: Could not find bridge device bridge name xenbr0 xenbr0 is definitely there and working and responds to all the usual diagnostic tools. I noti...

Is xenbr0 supposed to come up automatically when the dom0 starts up? When I do an ifconfig I don''t see any xenbr0. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...f I "xm console 13", there''s some message: WARNING: g.e. still in use! WARNING: leaking g.e. and page still in use! I found following in /var/log/message: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jan 4 21:06:31 m7 kernel: xenbr0: port 3(vif1.0) entering disabled state Jan 4 21:06:31 m7 kernel: device vif1.0 left promiscuous mode Jan 4 21:06:31 m7 kernel: xenbr0: port 3(vif1.0) entering disabled state Jan 4 21:06:32 m7 kernel: xenbr0: port 12(vif10.0) entering disabled state Jan 4 21:06:32 m7 kernel: device vif10.0 left...

Hello everybody, Here again with a Xenbr0 bridge problem I''m a Gentoo user, xen-sources-2.6.34 and I always used the bridge from eth0 to xenbr0. Here''s what I get at boot time: * Bringing up interface eth0 * null [...] * Starting Xen control daemon ... And the bridge doesn''t come up. The normal behaviour sh...

I have a Xen DomU configuration that was made in the days before libvirt and virt-install. In this configuration I have: vif = [ ''mac=00:16:3e:05:06:01, bridge=xenbr0'', ''mac=00:16:3e:05:06:0a, bridge=xenbr1'' ] and then in xend-config.sxp I define (network-script my-network-bridge) where my-network-bridge is in the scripts directory and looks like this: [root@fermigrid6 xen]# more scripts/my-network-bridge #!/bin/sh # start bridges...

I start sles10 use kernel-xen, but there''re not NIC eh0, and only have xenbr0, but the xenbr0 cannot get IP address via DHCP, (in normal sles10, the eth0 can get IP via DHCP), how can I connect to Internet in kerne-xen via xenbr0? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...th0 = interneteth1 = lan ------------------auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 192.168.0.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 gateway 192.168.0.254 auto xenbr0 iface xenbr0 inet static address 192.168.0.101 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 auto xenbr1 iface xenbr1 inet static address 192.168.0.102 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 _______________________________________________ Xen-users maili...

Hi there, my Server: Debian 4.0, XEN xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae I have successfully installed and running 13 domU. I have enough free ressources for number 14. I set it up in exactly the same way like the others. Once started this dumU Nr 14, every other domU lost its network connection. If I shutdown Nr 14, everything is working finde again. Is there a maximum number of domUs per Host?

...talling xen-3.0.31 on debian-etch-r7 version (apt-get install xen-linux-system-2.6.18-6-xen-686 screen ssh debootstrap python python-twisted iproute bridge-utils libcurl3-dev libssl0.9.7). My eth0 is configured to get IP via dhcp (interfaces file attached). I am able to boot into dom0, but starting xenbr0 causes loss of IP connectivity. Here is what I do. Initially, my /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp looks like this [...] #(network-script network-bridge) [...] (network-script network-dummy) [...] (vif-script vif-bridge) [...] Now when I boot into dom0 - I can ping www.google.com. The output if ifconfig is...