search for: xen_vring_use_dma

...e busy. On Wed, 1 Jul 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:34:53AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Would you be in favor of a more flexible check along the lines of the > > one proposed in the patch that started this thread: > > > > if (xen_vring_use_dma()) > > return true; > > > > > > xen_vring_use_dma would be implemented so that it returns true when > > xen_swiotlb is required and false otherwise. > > Just to stress - with a patch like this virtio can *still* use DMA API > if PLATFORM_ACCESS...

...e busy. On Wed, 1 Jul 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:34:53AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Would you be in favor of a more flexible check along the lines of the > > one proposed in the patch that started this thread: > > > > if (xen_vring_use_dma()) > > return true; > > > > > > xen_vring_use_dma would be implemented so that it returns true when > > xen_swiotlb is required and false otherwise. > > Just to stress - with a patch like this virtio can *still* use DMA API > if PLATFORM_ACCESS...

...if we fix generic dma_ops with virtio > > interfaces missing VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM. > > IMHO that Xen quirk should never have been added in this form.. Would you be in favor of a more flexible check along the lines of the one proposed in the patch that started this thread: if (xen_vring_use_dma()) return true; xen_vring_use_dma would be implemented so that it returns true when xen_swiotlb is required and false otherwise.

...if we fix generic dma_ops with virtio > > interfaces missing VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM. > > IMHO that Xen quirk should never have been added in this form.. Would you be in favor of a more flexible check along the lines of the one proposed in the patch that started this thread: if (xen_vring_use_dma()) return true; xen_vring_use_dma would be implemented so that it returns true when xen_swiotlb is required and false otherwise.

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:34:53AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Would you be in favor of a more flexible check along the lines of the > one proposed in the patch that started this thread: > > if (xen_vring_use_dma()) > return true; > > > xen_vring_use_dma would be implemented so that it returns true when > xen_swiotlb is required and false otherwise. Just to stress - with a patch like this virtio can *still* use DMA API if PLATFORM_ACCESS is set. So if DMA API is broken on some...

...020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:34:53AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > Would you be in favor of a more flexible check along the lines of the > > > one proposed in the patch that started this thread: > > > > > > if (xen_vring_use_dma()) > > > return true; > > > > > > > > > xen_vring_use_dma would be implemented so that it returns true when > > > xen_swiotlb is required and false otherwise. > > > > Just to stress - with a patch like this virtio can *still* u...

...b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static bool vring_use_dma_api(struct virtio_device *vdev) > * the DMA API if we're a Xen guest, which at least allows > * all of the sensible Xen configurations to work correctly. > */ > - if (xen_domain()) > + if (xen_vring_use_dma()) > return true; > > return false; The comment above this should probably be fixed. -- MST

...ivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static bool vring_use_dma_api(struct virtio_device *vdev) * the DMA API if we're a Xen guest, which at least allows * all of the sensible Xen configurations to work correctly. */ - if (xen_domain()) + if (xen_vring_use_dma()) return true; return false; diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c index b6d27762c6f8..25747e72e6fe 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ #include <trace/events/swiotlb.h> #define MAX_DMA_BITS 32 + +in...

...2,7 @@ static bool vring_use_dma_api(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > > * the DMA API if we're a Xen guest, which at least allows > > > * all of the sensible Xen configurations to work correctly. > > > */ > > > - if (xen_domain()) > > > + if (xen_vring_use_dma()) > > > return true; > > > > > > return false; > > > > > > The comment above this should probably be fixed. > > >

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 06:25:41AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > > > > Anyway, re-reading the last messages of the original thread [1], > > > > > it looks like Peng had a clear idea on how to fix the general issue. > > > > > Peng, what happened with that? > > > > > > We shrinked the rpmsg reserved area to workaround the issue. > >

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Peng Fan wrote: > > > If that is the case, how is it possible that virtio breaks on ARM > > > using the default dma_ops? The breakage is not Xen related (except > > > that Xen turns dma_ops on). The original message from Peng was: > > > > > > vring_map_one_sg -> vring_use_dma_api > > > ->

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 04:46:09PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > I could imagine some future Xen hosts setting a flag somewhere in the > > platform capability saying "no xen specific flag, rely on > > "VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM". Then you set that accordingly in QEMU. > > How about that? > > Yes, that would be fine and there is no problem

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 03:05:19AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:31:27AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wro...

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 03:05:19AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:31:27AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wro...

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 03:05:19AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:31:27AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 02:53:54PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsi...

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 02:53:54PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:59:47AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 05:17:32PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > > > > > Export xen_swiotlb for all platforms

...c > > @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static bool vring_use_dma_api(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > * the DMA API if we're a Xen guest, which at least allows > > * all of the sensible Xen configurations to work correctly. > > */ > > - if (xen_domain()) > > + if (xen_vring_use_dma()) > > return true; > > > > return false; > > > The comment above this should probably be fixed. >

...c > > @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static bool vring_use_dma_api(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > * the DMA API if we're a Xen guest, which at least allows > > * all of the sensible Xen configurations to work correctly. > > */ > > - if (xen_domain()) > > + if (xen_vring_use_dma()) > > return true; > > > > return false; > > > The comment above this should probably be fixed. >

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:31:27AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 02:53:54PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:59:47AM -0700,

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:31:27AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 02:53:54PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:59:47AM -0700,