Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "xcryptecb".
Did you mean:
cryptec
2013 Jan 17
1
[LLVMdev] MC X86 lacking support for hyphenated VIA Padlock instructions
...(working copy)
@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@
def XSTORE : I<0xc0, RawFrm, (outs), (ins), "xstore", []>, A7;
def : InstAlias<"xstorerng", (XSTORE)>;
+def : InstAlias<"xstore-rng", (XSTORE)>;
let Defs = [RSI, RDI], Uses = [RBX, RDX, RSI, RDI] in {
def XCRYPTECB : I<0xc8, RawFrm, (outs), (ins), "xcryptecb", []>, A7;
@@ -454,6 +455,12 @@
def XCRYPTOFB : I<0xe8, RawFrm, (outs), (ins), "xcryptofb", []>, A7;
}
+def : InstAlias<"xcrypt-ecb", (XCRYPTECB)>;
+def : InstAlias<"xcrypt-cbc", (XCRYPTCB...
2013 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] MC X86 lacking support for hyphenated VIA Padlock instructions
On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote:
> I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC
> on X86 could consider looking into adding support for
> the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions?
Take a look at llvm/lib/Target/X86InstrSystem.td perhaps.
--
Stephen Checkoway
2013 Jan 16
2
[LLVMdev] MC X86 lacking support for hyphenated VIA Padlock instructions
I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC
on X86 could consider looking into adding support for
the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions?
If anyone is up for it there are details within these
two bug reports..
http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8556
http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10266
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous