search for: xbd_chap03

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "xbd_chap03".

2016 May 01
3
E-mail advice sought
...gt;> problem. > > > That's not how the RFC rules are defined. But, rather than argue that > point at length, I'd point out that Open Group standards for usernames > are simple and will comply with the SMTP RFCs: > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/xbd_chap03.html#tag_03_426 > > That is, [A-Za-z0-9._][A-Za-z0-9._-] > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > I think there is a mis-understanding. All I was looking for was if ther...
2016 Apr 30
3
E-mail advice sought
On 04/30/2016 12:22 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/30/2016 11:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> Is there any advice on characters to allow in usernames? > ... >> I don't think a whitelist alphabet is best approach because of people >> with names that are not spelled with Latin characters. >> >> Is there an existing blacklist of characters that technically
2016 May 01
3
E-mail advice sought
...gt;> That's not how the RFC rules are defined. But, rather than argue that >>> point at length, I'd point out that Open Group standards for usernames >>> are simple and will comply with the SMTP RFCs: >>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/xbd_chap03.html#tag_03_426 >>> >>> That is, [A-Za-z0-9._][A-Za-z0-9._-] >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS at centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> >> >>...
2016 May 01
0
E-mail advice sought
...d in a username is a standards > problem. That's not how the RFC rules are defined. But, rather than argue that point at length, I'd point out that Open Group standards for usernames are simple and will comply with the SMTP RFCs: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/xbd_chap03.html#tag_03_426 That is, [A-Za-z0-9._][A-Za-z0-9._-]
2016 May 01
0
E-mail advice sought
...>> >> That's not how the RFC rules are defined. But, rather than argue that >> point at length, I'd point out that Open Group standards for usernames >> are simple and will comply with the SMTP RFCs: >> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/xbd_chap03.html#tag_03_426 >> >> That is, [A-Za-z0-9._][A-Za-z0-9._-] >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > I think there is a mis-understan...
2016 May 01
0
E-mail advice sought
...'s not how the RFC rules are defined. But, rather than argue that >>>> point at length, I'd point out that Open Group standards for usernames >>>> are simple and will comply with the SMTP RFCs: >>>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/xbd_chap03.html#tag_03_426 >>>> >>>> >>>> That is, [A-Za-z0-9._][A-Za-z0-9._-] >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CentOS mailing list >>>> CentOS at centos.org >>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi...