Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "xaxxon".
Did you mean:
taxon
2016 Jul 26
2
[PATCH] Add support for the 'unless' matcher in the dynamic layer.
...ching that was not unnecessary when they only had a
> single node.
> On the current implementation we could actually get rid of the node
> completely for the one argument calls.
> I would be ok with removing the lower bound.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Zac Hansen <xaxxon at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if there is any objection to removing the 2-element
>> minimum on the eachOf, anyOf and allOf matchers.
>>
>> It is frustrating when playing with matchers to have to edit significant
>> amounts of code to be able to tempo...
2016 Jul 26
2
[PATCH] Add support for the 'unless' matcher in the dynamic layer.
I was wondering if there is any objection to removing the 2-element minimum
on the eachOf, anyOf and allOf matchers.
It is frustrating when playing with matchers to have to edit significant
amounts of code to be able to temporarily go from 2 to 1 matcher inside an
any- or allOf matcher.
And overall it feels very "un-set-theory"-like.
The change was made here:
2007 Mar 03
1
Ajax.Updater with evalScripts: true strips curly braces
When I return an html fragment to Ajax.Updater with evalScripts: true set,
and there is a script fragment with curly braces in it (a function
declaration or an object literal), the curly braces are getting stripped out
somehow, and leaving me with invalid JS.
I think this is the case because I put an alert in the evalScripts method
right before the "return eval(script)" and it had no