Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "xas_stor".
Did you mean:
xas_store
2020 Mar 19
2
[PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
...21293] RBP: ffffc900015e78a0 R08: ffffffff811461c4 R09: fffff520002bcf17
[ 138.028426] R10: fffff520002bcf16 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: 0000000002606d10
[ 138.035557] R13: ffff8886e508c448 R14: 0000000000000031 R15: ffffffffa06546a0
[ 138.042701] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x104/0x1d0
[ 138.046888] ? xas_store+0x19/0xa60
[ 138.050390] xas_store+0x5b3/0xa60
[ 138.053806] ? register_lock_class+0x860/0x860
[ 138.058267] __xa_erase+0x96/0x110
[ 138.061673] ? xas_store+0xa60/0xa60
[ 138.065267] xa_erase+0x19/0x30
[ 138.068418] dmirror_interval_invalidate+0x7d/0xc0 [test_hmm]
[ 138.074174] __mmu...
2020 Mar 20
0
[PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
...015e78a0 R08: ffffffff811461c4 R09: fffff520002bcf17
> [ 138.028426] R10: fffff520002bcf16 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: 0000000002606d10
> [ 138.035557] R13: ffff8886e508c448 R14: 0000000000000031 R15: ffffffffa06546a0
> [ 138.042701] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x104/0x1d0
> [ 138.046888] ? xas_store+0x19/0xa60
> [ 138.050390] xas_store+0x5b3/0xa60
> [ 138.053806] ? register_lock_class+0x860/0x860
> [ 138.058267] __xa_erase+0x96/0x110
> [ 138.061673] ? xas_store+0xa60/0xa60
> [ 138.065267] xa_erase+0x19/0x30
oh, it is doing this:
static void mn_itree_release(struct m...
2020 Mar 17
4
[PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
On 3/17/20 5:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:47:55AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> I've been using v7 of Ralph's tester and it is working well - it has
>> DEVICE_PRIVATE support so I think it can test this flow too. Ralph are
>> you able?
>>
>> This hunk seems trivial enough to me, can we include it now?
>
> I can send