search for: x_copy

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "x_copy".

Did you mean: rx_copy
2014 Jan 23
2
[LLVMdev] Position-independent stacks
Thanks Mark! That'd be a useful starting point. For the rest of the people here: to be a bit more specific, I am having doubts about the following: - Can later optimization passes or code generation still create machine code that takes and stores (in a register perhaps) an address of something on the stack, even if not semantically visible to the programmer? Can this somehow be detected?