search for: x86disassembler

...LLVM due to its humongousness, but I hope the graph will be helpful to others attempting to comprehend LLVM. PNG attached; dot file follows. digraph G { ipo [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1]; ipa [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1]; X86Info [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1]; X86Disassembler [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1]; X86CodeGen [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1]; X86AsmPrinter [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1]; X86AsmParser [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1]; TransformUtils [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1]; Target [shape=box,style=filled,...

...TableGen backend to generate hierarchical tables optimized for fast decode. The disassembler consumes MemoryObjects and produces arrays of MCInsts, adhering to the abstract base class MCDisassembler (llvm/ MC/MCDisassembler.h). The disassembler is documented in detail in – - lib/Target/X86/X86Disassembler.h (disassembler runtime) - utils/TableGen/X86DisassemblerEmitter.h (table emitter) – as well as in the individual files, functions, and classes. I implemented a use case in tools/llvm-mc/HexDisassembler.cpp, which implements an interactive disassembler for sequences of bytes entered in hex on...

...within a .cpp > file, go ahead and define it in an anonymous namespace and mark it > "VISIBILITY_HIDDEN". Like this: > > namespace { > class VISIBILITY_HIDDEN StringMemoryObject : public MemoryObject { > ... I used VISIBILITY_HIDDEN for both StringMemoryObject and X86DisassemblerEmitter::X86DEBackend. I wrapped StringMemoryObject in an anonymous namespace. I didn't wrap X86DEBackend because it's already nested. > 5. In "readBytes" in StringMemoryObject, you're returning a "-1", > but the method's return type is "uint64_t&quo...

Thank You. I used EVEX_4V with all the instructions. I replaced TA and EVEX both with EVEX_4V. Now, I am getting following error: llvm-tblgen: /utils/TableGen/X86RecognizableInstr.cpp:687: void llvm::X86Disassembler::RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionSpecifier(): Assertion `numPhysicalOperands >= 2 + additionalOperands && numPhysicalOperands <= 4 + additionalOperands && "Unexpected number of operands for MRMSrcMemFrm"' failed What to do now? On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:23 AM,...

...05 at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thank You. >> >> I used EVEX_4V with all the instructions. I replaced TA and EVEX both >> with EVEX_4V. Now, I am getting following error: >> >> llvm-tblgen: /utils/TableGen/X86RecognizableInstr.cpp:687: void >> llvm::X86Disassembler::RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionSpecifier(): >> Assertion `numPhysicalOperands >= 2 + additionalOperands && >> numPhysicalOperands <= 4 + additionalOperands && "Unexpected number of >> operands for MRMSrcMemFrm"' failed >> >> What...

...functionPass); Please don't use dynamic_cast: we're trying to eliminate RTTI a C cast should be fine. +int HexDisassembler::disassemble(const Target* target, + LineReader& reader) { ... + + if(targetName == "x86") { + disasm = new X86Disassembler::X86_32Disassembler(obj, logstream); + triple = "x86-apple-darwin"; + } + else if(targetName == "x86-64") { + disasm = new X86Disassembler::X86_64Disassembler(obj, logstream); + triple = "x86_64-apple-darwin"; + } + else { Instead of doing s...

...rarchical tables optimized for fast > decode. The disassembler consumes MemoryObjects and produces arrays > of MCInsts, adhering to the abstract base class MCDisassembler (llvm/ > MC/MCDisassembler.h). > > The disassembler is documented in detail in > – > - lib/Target/X86/X86Disassembler.h (disassembler runtime) > - utils/TableGen/X86DisassemblerEmitter.h (table emitter) > – > as well as in the individual files, functions, and classes. > > I implemented a use case in tools/llvm-mc/HexDisassembler.cpp, which > implements an interactive disassembler for sequences...

...ank You. >>>> >>>> I used EVEX_4V with all the instructions. I replaced TA and EVEX both >>>> with EVEX_4V. Now, I am getting following error: >>>> >>>> llvm-tblgen: /utils/TableGen/X86RecognizableInstr.cpp:687: void >>>> llvm::X86Disassembler::RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionSpecifier(): >>>> Assertion `numPhysicalOperands >= 2 + additionalOperands && >>>> numPhysicalOperands <= 4 + additionalOperands && "Unexpected number of >>>> operands for MRMSrcMemFrm"' faile...

On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:55 PM, "Robinson, Paul" <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: I keep seeing "this is a layering violation" comments on the lists. > While there are a few llvm.org pages that mention layers in passing, > there is nothing (that I've found) actually specifying the layers. > Trying to infer the layering from the code is tedious and

I keep seeing "this is a layering violation" comments on the lists. While there are a few llvm.org pages that mention layers in passing, there is nothing (that I've found) actually specifying the layers. Trying to infer the layering from the code is tedious and error-prone (or we wouldn't see so many violations in code reviews, eh?). Now, I understand that Google has some sort

...xceptions -fno-rtti -fno-common -Woverloaded-virtual bash-3.2$ /sw/lib/llvm/bin/llvm-config --ldflags -L/sw/lib/llvm/lib -lpthread -lm bash-3.2$ /sw/lib/llvm/bin/llvm-config --libs -lLLVMLinker -lLLVMipo -lLLVMInterpreter -lLLVMInstrumentation -lLLVMJIT -lLLVMExecutionEngine -lLLVMBitWriter -lLLVMX86Disassembler -lLLVMX86AsmParser -lLLVMMCParser -lLLVMX86AsmPrinter -lLLVMX86CodeGen -lLLVMSelectionDAG -lLLVMX86Info -lLLVMAsmPrinter -lLLVMCodeGen -lLLVMScalarOpts -lLLVMInstCombine -lLLVMTransformUtils -lLLVMipa -lLLVMAsmParser -lLLVMArchive -lLLVMBitReader -lLLVMAnalysis -lLLVMTarget -lLLVMMC -lLLVMCore -lLL...

...addr:$src2)))], IIC_MOV_MEM>, TA; def: Pat<(v64f32 (masked_gather (VR_2048:$src1), (VK64WM:$mask),(addr:$src2))), (GATHER_256B VR_2048:$src1, VK64WM:$mask, addr:$src2)>; Now getting this error: llvm-tblgen: /utils/TableGen/X86RecognizableInstr.cpp:687: void llvm::X86Disassembler::RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionSpecifier(): Assertion `numPhysicalOperands >= 2 + additionalOperands && numPhysicalOperands <= 4 + additionalOperands && "Unexpected number of operands for MRMSrcMemFrm"' failed. On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Craig To...

Sorry to ask but what does it mean to put both? On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Leave TA. Put both. > > ~Craig > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:00 PM, hameeza ahmed <hahmed2305 at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> You are right. But when i defined my instruction as follows: >> def P_256B_VADD : I<0xE1,

...se+Asserts build llvm[2]: Compiling PseudoLoweringEmitter.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Compiling RegisterInfoEmitter.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Compiling SubtargetEmitter.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Compiling TableGen.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Compiling X86DisassemblerTables.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Compiling X86ModRMFilters.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Compiling X86RecognizableInstr.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Linking Release+Asserts executable llvm-tblgen (without symbols) llvm[2]: ======= Finished Linking Release+Asserts Exec...