search for: x86atomicexpandpass

> From my reading of Atomics.rst, it would be sound to reorder (It does not > say much about load-linked, so I am treating it as a normal load here) > >> store seq_cst >> fence release >> load-linked monotonic > > into > >> load-linked monotonic >> store seq_cst >> fence release > Which would make an execution ending in %old_x = %old_y = 0

Hi Robin, On 15 August 2014 21:49, Robin Morisset <morisset at google.com> wrote: > I have > attached the corresponding patches; they are not completely ready for review > (mostly missing tests), I would just like to make sure that the general > approach seems reasonable. I've had a quick glance at the patches, and the code seems fairly sane. But I'm not so sure about