search for: x86_64_jit

...#else ((unsigned char*)RetAddr)[-1] = 0xE9; sys::ValgrindDiscardTranslations((void*)(RetAddr-1), 5); @@ -442,7 +448,7 @@ void *X86JITInfo::emitGlobalValueIndirectSym(const GlobalValue* GV, void *ptr, JITCodeEmitter &JCE) { -#if defined (X86_64_JIT) +#if defined (X86_64_JIT) && defined (__LP64__) const unsigned Alignment = 8; uint8_t Buffer[8]; uint8_t *Cur = Buffer; @@ -481,7 +487,7 @@ JCE.emitAlignment(4); void *Result = (void*)JCE.getCurrentPCValue(); if (NotCC) { -#if defined (X86_64_JIT) +#if defined (X86_64_JIT...

Hi, I'm working on bringing up complete coverage for a Gentoo x32 "desktop" system. I've been cooking up quite a few patches for various packages to push upstream, but right now, the biggest blocker is the lack of support for building with/codegen targeting x32 in llvm/clang. Since the x32 patches were sent last year, I see support code has landed in LLVM, and basic handling of

...#else ((unsigned char*)RetAddr)[-1] = 0xE9; sys::ValgrindDiscardTranslations((void*)(RetAddr-1), 5); @@ -442,7 +448,7 @@ void *X86JITInfo::emitGlobalValueIndirectSym(const GlobalValue* GV, void *ptr, JITCodeEmitter &JCE) { -#if defined (X86_64_JIT) +#if defined (X86_64_JIT) && defined (__LP64__) const unsigned Alignment = 8; uint8_t Buffer[8]; uint8_t *Cur = Buffer; @@ -481,7 +487,7 @@ JCE.emitAlignment(4); void *Result = (void*)JCE.getCurrentPCValue(); if (NotCC) { -#if defined (X86_64_JIT) +#if defined (X86_64_JIT...

It looks fine to me. Anton, does it look ok to you? Evan On Mar 20, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Corrado Zoccolo wrote: > I've created a patch (attached to the bug): > http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=2744, that goes in a different > direction, and solves the safety problems. > The patch uses original asm, but removes the call through plt, and > puts the invoked function in an

Hi Evan > It looks fine to me. Anton, does it look ok to you? This looks ok for me modulo win64+vcpp issues, which I mentioned in the PR (external .asm files). The anonymous namespace thing should be guarded by define (either _M_AMD64 or X86_64_JIT && _MSC_VER, I'd prefer the latter). -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.