Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "x64_2010".
Did you mean:
x64_2014
2020 Jul 22
3
New x86-64 micro-architecture levels
* Dongsheng Song:
> I fully agree these names (100/101, A/B/C/D) are not very intuitive, I
> recommend using isa tags by year (e.g. x64_2010, x64_2014) like the
> python's platform tags (e.g. manylinux2010, manylinux2014).
I started out with a year number, but that was before the was Level A.
Too many new CPUs only fall under level A unfortunately because they do
not even have AVX. This even applies to some new server CPU desig...
2020 Jul 22
2
New x86-64 micro-architecture levels
* Richard Biener:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:58 AM Florian Weimer via Gcc <gcc at gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> * Dongsheng Song:
>>
>> > I fully agree these names (100/101, A/B/C/D) are not very intuitive, I
>> > recommend using isa tags by year (e.g. x64_2010, x64_2014) like the
>> > python's platform tags (e.g. manylinux2010, manylinux2014).
>>
>> I started out with a year number, but that was before the was Level A.
>> Too many new CPUs only fall under level A unfortunately because they do
>> not even have AVX. Th...
2020 Jul 21
7
New x86-64 micro-architecture levels
* Premachandra Mallappa:
> [AMD Public Use]
>
> Hi Floarian,
>
>> I'm including a proposal for the levels below. I use single letters for them, but I expect that the concrete implementation of this proposal will use
>> names like “x86-100”, “x86-101”, like in the glibc patch referenced above. (But we can discuss other approaches.)
>
> Personally I am not a big