search for: x64_2010

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "x64_2010".

Did you mean: x64_2014
2020 Jul 22
3
New x86-64 micro-architecture levels
* Dongsheng Song: > I fully agree these names (100/101, A/B/C/D) are not very intuitive, I > recommend using isa tags by year (e.g. x64_2010, x64_2014) like the > python's platform tags (e.g. manylinux2010, manylinux2014). I started out with a year number, but that was before the was Level A. Too many new CPUs only fall under level A unfortunately because they do not even have AVX. This even applies to some new server CPU desig...
2020 Jul 22
2
New x86-64 micro-architecture levels
* Richard Biener: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:58 AM Florian Weimer via Gcc <gcc at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> >> * Dongsheng Song: >> >> > I fully agree these names (100/101, A/B/C/D) are not very intuitive, I >> > recommend using isa tags by year (e.g. x64_2010, x64_2014) like the >> > python's platform tags (e.g. manylinux2010, manylinux2014). >> >> I started out with a year number, but that was before the was Level A. >> Too many new CPUs only fall under level A unfortunately because they do >> not even have AVX. Th...
2020 Jul 21
7
New x86-64 micro-architecture levels
* Premachandra Mallappa: > [AMD Public Use] > > Hi Floarian, > >> I'm including a proposal for the levels below. I use single letters for them, but I expect that the concrete implementation of this proposal will use >> names like “x86-100”, “x86-101”, like in the glibc patch referenced above. (But we can discuss other approaches.) > > Personally I am not a big