search for: x36

...(k4*k2*x13)+(k4*k3*x14)+(k4*k4*x15)+(k5*x16)+(k5*k1*x17)+(k5*k2*x18)+(k5*k3*x19)+ (k5*k4*x20)+(k5*k5*x21)+(k6*x22)+(k6*k1*x23)+(k6*k2*x24)+(k6*k3*x25)+(k6*k4*x26)+(k6*k5*x27)+(k6*k6*x28)+ (k7*x29)+(k7*k1*x30)+(k7*k2*x31)+(k7*k3*x32)+(k7*k4*x33)+(k7*k5*x34)+(k7*k6*x35)+(k7*k7*x36)),x, start=c(beta1=-0.001480981,k1=0.001,k2=0.001,k3=0.001,k4=0.001,k5=0.001,k6=0.001,k7=0.001),control=c(maxiter=100)) where beta1, k1 -- k7 are the parameters to be estimated and x1---x36 are the columns of the dataframe x when i run this expression I get the error...

...s. I have about 80 features, and when I fit a model using the following formula,? glmfit = glm(y ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x16 + x17 + x18 + x19 + x20 + x21 + x22 + x23 + x24 + x25 + x26 + x27 + x28 + x29 + x30 + x31 + x32 + x33 + x34 + x35 + x36 + x37 + x38 + x39 + x40 + x41 + x42 + x43 + x44 + x45 + x46 + x47 + x48 + x49 + x50 + x51 + x52 + x53 + x54 + x55 + x56 + x57 + x58 + x59 + x60 + x61 + x62 + x63 + x64 + x65 + x66 + x67 + x68 + x69 + x70 + x71 + x72 + x73 + x74 + x75 + x76 + x77 + x78 + x79 + x80) it gives me an error "Error i...

...but as there are no replications and it's a paired t-test, I'm not able to calculate an ANOVA. Below you find the data, I hope someone can point me to the right way. Kind regards Bart dat <-structure(list(Sample = 1:8, X12 = c(0.305, 0.44, 0.6, 0.47, 0.49, 0.17, 0.435, 0.435), X36 = c(0.84, 1.16, 1.32, 1.17, 0.78, 0.43, 0.93, 0.9), X60 = c(1.05, 0.9, 0.98, 1.03, 0.77, 0.47, 0.85, 1.11), X84 = c(0.87, 0.95, 1.31, 1.13, 0.62, 0.93, 1.02, 0.79), X108 = c(0.79, 0.92, 1.29, 0.97, 0.74, 0.86, 1.03, 1.41)), .Names = c("Sample", "X12", "X36", "X60&...

...hat the plots are easier to interpret? Thanks in advance, Suzan -- Suzan Pool Oregon State University Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies c/o NOAA Fisheries 520 Heceta Place P.O. Box 155 Hammond, OR 97121 Suzan.Pool at oregonstate.edu Suzan.Pool at noaa.gov Phone: 503-861-1818 x36 TTY Voice to TTY: 711 Fax: 503-861-2589

...quot;,"X18","X19","X20","X21","X22","X23","X24","X25","X26","X27","X28","X29","X30","X31","X32","X33","X34","X35","X36","X37","X38","X39","X40","X41","X42","X43","X44","X45","X46","X47","X48","X49","X50","X51","X52","X53","X54",&quot...

...in 1:1000){ blumenau<-read.table("Blu_1.txt",h=T) # 1000 *.txt files Guildas<-data.frame(cbind(t(blumenau[2:50]))) Guilda1<-cbind(X27,X48) Guilda2<-cbind(X5,X17,X19,X20,X21,X24,X25,X26,X40,X41,X77) Guilda3<-cbind(X22,X28,X69) Guilda4<-cbind(X29,X30,X31,X32,X33,X34,X35,X36,X37,X78) Guilda5<-cbind(X3,X8,X18,X23,X63,X82,X83) Guilda6<-cbind(X6,X38,X39,X44,X45,X46,X47,X49,X50,X51,X52,X53,X54,X55,X56,X57,X58,X59,X60,X61,X62,X84) Guilda7<-cbind(X1,X2,X42,X43,X64,X65,X66,X67,X68,X79,X80) Guilda8<-cbind(X7,X15,X16,X70,X71,X72,X73,X74,X75,X76) Guilda9<-cbind(X4...

...X18","X19","X20","X21" > ,"X22","X23","X24","X25","X26","X27","X28","X29","X30","X31" > ,"X32","X33","X34","X35","X36","X37","X38","X39","X40","X41" > ,"X42","X43","X44","X45","X46","X47","X48","X49","X50","X51" > ,"X52","X53","X54...

..."X19" "X20" [21] "X21" "X22" "X23" "X24" "X25" "X26" "X27" "X28" "X29" "X30" "X31" "X32" "X33" "X34" "X35" "X36" "X37" "X38" "X39" "X40" [41] "X41" "X42" "X43" "X44" "X45" "X46" "X47" "X48" "X49" "X50" "X51" "X52" "X53"...

Hello, I have looked on https://www.r-project.org/bugs.html , but it seems that this is the only way to do it. The issue is that the precision used by write.csv is on consistant for big files. See the following code: First I create a large dataframe filled with random uniform values. Then I write it to .csv and print out the first and last lines. df = data.frame(replicate(100, runif(1000000,

Hello everyone, I am trying to fit the following model All X. variables are continuous, while the conditions are categoricals. model <- lm(X2 +X3+X4+X5+X6+X7+X8+X9+X10+X11+X12+X13+X14+X15+X16+X17+X18+X19+X20+X21+X22+X23+X24+X25+X26+X27+X28+X29+X30+X31+X32+X33+X34+X35+X36+X37+X38+X39+X40+X41+X42+X43+X44+X45+X46+X47+X48+X49+X50+X51+X52+X53+X54+X55+X56+X57+X58+X59+X60+X61+X62+X63+X64+X65+X66+X67+X68+X69+X70+X71+X72+X73+X74+X75+X76+X77+X78+X79+X80+X81+X82+X83+X84+X85+X86+X87+X88+X89+X90+X91+X92+X93+X94+X95+X96+X97+X98+X99+X100+X101+X102+X103+X104+X105+X106+X107+X108+X1...

...quot;,"X18","X19","X20","X21","X22","X23","X24","X25","X26","X27","X28","X29","X30","X31","X32","X33","X34","X35","X36","X37","X38","X39","X40","X41","X42","X43","X44","X45","X46","X47","X48","X49","X50","X51","X52","X53","X54",&quot...

Full_Name: Derek Elmerick Version: 2.4.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (38.117.162.243) hello - i have some code that i run regularly using R version 2.3.x . the final step of the code is to build a multinomial logit model. the dataset is large; however, i have not had issues in the past. i just installed the 2.4.0 version of R and now have memory allocation issues. to verify, i ran

...x18","x19","x20", "x21","x22","x23","x24","x25","x26","x27","x28","x29","x30", "x31","x32","x33","x34","x35","x36","x37","x38","x39","x40", "x41","x42","x43","x44","x45","x46","x47","x48","x49","x50", "x51","x52","x53","x54...

...ot;, "X19", "X20", "X21", "X22", "X23", "X24", "X25", "X26", "X27", "X28", "X29", "X30", "X31", "X32", "X33", "X34", "X35", "X36", "X37", "X38", "X39", "X40", "X41", "X42", "X43", "X44", "X45", "X46", "X47", "X48", "X49", "X50", "X51", "X52", "X53", &qu...

..., > [ drv_inf, REG_BINARY "\x01\xff\x00\x00" ]; > > + [ "DriverDatabase"; "DriverPackages"; drv_inf_label ], > + [ "Version", REG_BINARY ("\x00\xff\x09\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00" ^ > + "\x7b\xe9\x36\x4d\x25\xe3\xce\x11" ^ > + "\xbf\xc1\x08\x00\x2b\xe1\x03\x18" ^ > + (String.make 24 '\x00')) ]; > + (* Version is necessary for Windows-Kernel-Pnp in w10/w2k16 *) > + > [ "DriverDatabase"...

...quot;,"X18","X19","X20","X21","X22","X23","X24","X25","X26","X27","X28","X29","X30","X31","X32","X33","X34","X35","X36","X37","X38","X39","X40","X41","X42","X43","X44","X45","X46","X47","X48","X49","X50","X51","X52","X53","X54",&quot...

...[1] "xlearn" rs2289472 rs1551398 rs7927894 X18 "CT" "AA" "CT" X19 "TT" "AA" "CC" X33 "TT" "AG" "TT" X35 "TT" "AA" "CT" X36 "CC" "AA" "CT" X41 "CT" "AA" "CT" X46 "TT" "AA" "CT" X65 "CT" "AG" "CT" X77 "CC" "AA" "CT" X25...

...Compatibility Publisher"; - "SignerScore", REG_DWORD 0x0d000005_l; - "StatusFlags", REG_DWORD 0x00000012_l; - (* NB: scsi_adapter_guid appears inside this string. *) - "Version", REG_BINARY "\x00\xff\x09\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x7b\xe9\x36\x4d\x25\xe3\xce\x11\xbf\xc1\x08\x00\x2b\xe1\x03\x18\x00\x40\x90\xed\x87\x7f\xcf\x01\x98\x21\x68\x00\x47\x00\x3e\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00" ]; - - [ "DriverDatabase"; "DriverPackages"; viostor_inf; "Configurations" ], - []; + let service_group...

...the ridge function when calling coxph with following formula Surv(time = futime, event = fustat, type = "right") ~ ridge(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, X9, X10, X11, X12, X13, X14, X15, X16, X17, X18, X19, X20, X21, X22, X23, X24, X25, X26, X27, X28, X29, X30, X31, X32, X33, X34, X35, X36, X37, X38, X39, X40, X41, X42, X43, X44, X45, X46, X47, X48, X49, X50, X51, X52, X53, X54, X55, X56, X57, X58, X59, X60, X61, X62, X63, X64, X65, X66, X67, X68, X69, X70, X71, X72, X73, X74, X75, X76, X77, X78, X79, X80, X81, X82, X83, X84, X85, X86, X87, X88, X89, X90, X91, X92, X93, X94, X95,...

Hi, I was wondering how it was possible to access the actual cluster exemplars from the APResult class. Currently it only spits it out onto the terminal if you type the object but there is no other way to see which one is the examplar. Would appreciate any help. Thanks, Sachin [[alternative HTML version deleted]]