Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "x1v".
Did you mean:
x11
2015 Mar 13
1
[RFC PATCH v3] Intrinsics/RTCD related fixes. Mostly x86.
...l16 g10, opus_val16 g11, opus_val16 g12)
+{
+ int i;
+ __m128 x0v;
+ __m128 g10v, g11v, g12v;
+ g10v = _mm_load1_ps(&g10);
+ g11v = _mm_load1_ps(&g11);
+ g12v = _mm_load1_ps(&g12);
+ x0v = _mm_loadu_ps(&x[-T-2]);
+ for (i=0;i<N-3;i+=4)
+ {
+ __m128 yi, yi2, x1v, x2v, x3v, x4v;
+ const opus_val32 *xp = &x[i-T-2];
+ yi = _mm_loadu_ps(x+i);
+ x4v = _mm_loadu_ps(xp+4);
+#if 0
+ /* Slower version with all loads */
+ x1v = _mm_loadu_ps(xp+1);
+ x2v = _mm_loadu_ps(xp+2);
+ x3v = _mm_loadu_ps(xp+3);
+#else
+ x2v = _mm_s...
2015 Mar 12
1
[RFC PATCHv2] Intrinsics/RTCD related fixes. Mostly x86.
...l16 g10, opus_val16 g11, opus_val16 g12)
+{
+ int i;
+ __m128 x0v;
+ __m128 g10v, g11v, g12v;
+ g10v = _mm_load1_ps(&g10);
+ g11v = _mm_load1_ps(&g11);
+ g12v = _mm_load1_ps(&g12);
+ x0v = _mm_loadu_ps(&x[-T-2]);
+ for (i=0;i<N-3;i+=4)
+ {
+ __m128 yi, yi2, x1v, x2v, x3v, x4v;
+ const opus_val32 *xp = &x[i-T-2];
+ yi = _mm_loadu_ps(x+i);
+ x4v = _mm_loadu_ps(xp+4);
+#if 0
+ /* Slower version with all loads */
+ x1v = _mm_loadu_ps(xp+1);
+ x2v = _mm_loadu_ps(xp+2);
+ x3v = _mm_loadu_ps(xp+3);
+#else
+ x2v = _mm_s...
2015 Mar 02
13
Patch cleaning up Opus x86 intrinsics configury
The attached patch cleans up Opus's x86 intrinsics configury.
It:
* Makes ?enable-intrinsics work with clang and other non-GCC compilers
* Enables RTCD for the floating-point-mode SSE code in Celt.
* Disables use of RTCD in cases where the compiler targets an instruction set by default.
* Enables the SSE4.1 Silk optimizations that apply to the common parts of Silk when Opus is built in
2015 Mar 18
5
[RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Enable aarch64 intrinsics/Ne10
Hi All,
Since I continue to base my work on top of Jonathan's patch,
and my previous Ne10 fft/ifft/mdct_forward/backward patches,
I thought it would be better to just post all new patches
as a patch series. Please let me know if anyone disagrees
with this approach.
You can see wip branch of all latest patches at
https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/opus.git
Branch:
2015 Mar 31
6
[RFC PATCH v1 0/5] aarch64: celt_pitch_xcorr: Fixed point series
Hi Timothy,
As I mentioned earlier [1], I now fixed compile issues
with fixed point and resubmitting the patch.
I also have new patch that does intrinsics optimizations
for celt_pitch_xcorr targetting aarch64.
You can find my latest work-in-progress branch at [2]
For reference, you can use the Ne10 pre-built libraries
at [3]
Note that I am working with Phil at ARM to get my patch at [4]
2015 May 08
8
[RFC PATCH v2]: Ne10 fft fixed and previous 0/8]
Hi All,
As per Timothy's suggestion, disabling mdct_forward
for fixed point. Only effects
armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct
Rest of patches are same as in [1]
For reference, latest wip code for opus is at [2]
Still working with NE10 team at ARM to get corner cases of
mdct_forward. Will update with another patch
when issue in NE10 gets fixed.
Regards,
Vish
[1]:
2015 May 15
11
[RFC V3 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hi All,
Changes from RFC v2 [1]
armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct
- Overflow issue fixed by Phil at ARM. Ne10 wip at [2]. Should be upstream soon.
- So, re-enabled using fixed fft for mdct_forward which was disabled in RFCv2
armv7,armv8: Optimize fixed point fft using NE10 library
- Thanks to Jonathan Lennox, fixed some build fixes on iOS and some copy-paste errors
Rest
2015 Apr 28
10
[RFC PATCH v1 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hello Timothy / Jean-Marc / opus-dev,
This patch series is follow up on work I posted on [1].
In addition to what was posted on [1], this patch series mainly
integrates Fixed point FFT implementations in NE10 library into opus.
You can view my opus wip code at [2].
Note that while I found some issues both with the NE10 library(fixed fft)
and with Linaro toolchain (armv8 intrinsics), the work
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking