search for: x16

...> cum1 [1] "A11*(X11*x1+X21*x2)+1*sqrt(B11*(X11*x1+X21*x2)^2+C11)A12*(X12*x1+X22*x2)+1*sqrt(B12*(X12*x1+X22*x2)^2+C12)A13*(X13*x1+X23*x2)+-1*sqrt(B13*(X13*x1+X23*x2)^2+C13)A14*(X14*x1+X24*x2)+-1*sqrt(B14*(X14*x1+X24*x2)^2+C14)A15*(X15*x1+X25*x2)+1*sqrt(B15*(X15*x1+X25*x2)^2+C15)A16*(X16*x1+X26*x2)+1*sqrt(B16*(X16*x1+X26*x2)^2+C16)A17*(X17*x1+X27*x2)+1*sqrt(B17*(X17*x1+X27*x2)^2+C17)A18*(X18*x1+X28*x2)+1*sqrt(B18*(X18*x1+X28*x2)^2+C18)A19*(X19*x1+X29*x2)+-1*sqrt(B19*(X19*x1+X29*x2)^2+C19)A110*(X110*x1+X210*x2)+1*sqrt(B110*(X110*x1+X210*x2)^2+C110)" > cum2 [1] "A21*(X...

...on E5-2609 processor 2) SuperMicro 5017C-LF, Xeon E3-1220 processor (I wish SuperMicro had a list of their servers by chassis somewhere.) I have no preference between the solutions for right now, though I have a major concern with the second solution; the PCIe slot is only x8, and the NVS510 is a x16 card. The vendor assures me that a riser/adapter can be found to plug the card into the slot, and that it will work, but I am highly concerned about the performance. I know nothing about PCIe (I haven't built a system in 10 years, though I have read the PCIe Wikipedia entries and some guides);...

Hi, I am trying to execute a simple hello world program compiled like so: path/to/compiled/clang -o test --target=aarch64-linux-gnu -march=armv8.5-a -fsanitize=hwaddress --sysroot=/usr/aarch64-linux-gnu/ -L/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/10.1.0/ -g test.c However, when I look at the disassembly, there is an unknown instruction listed at 0x2d51c: 000000000002d4c0 main: 2d4c0: ff c3 00 d1

...x5=c(5,4,3,3,4,4,4,5,NA,5),x6=c(3,5,2,1,4,NA,NA,5,3,4),x7=c(5,4,3,4,4,3,4,NA,NA,4),x8=c(5,5,3,4,5,4,5,4,5,5),x9=c(5,1,1,1,NA,3,3,2,2,3),x10=c(5,5,2,3,4,3,1,3,2,5),x11=c(5,4,4,5,5,4,5,4,5,5),x12=c(5,4,5,5,5,4,5,5,5,5),x13=c(5,4,4,5,5,5,5,5,5,5),x14=c(5,3,3,NA,5,4,5,3,NA,5),x15=c(4,4,4,3,4,5,2,4,5,5),x16=c(5,4,3,3,4,4,3,3,4,5)) and I want to carry out a confirmatory factor analysis using the "cfa" function (lavaan). library(lavaan) then I specify my model cfa.model<-'      f1=~x1+x2+x3+x4+x5                 f2=~x6+x7+x8+x9+x10+x11                 f3=~x12+x13+x14+x15+x16 '...

Dear All, Hypervisor: Xen 4.0.2-rc1-pre pv-ops dom0 kernel: 2.6.32.26 Distro: Fedora 11 Linux x86_64 Graphics card: NVIDIA Geforce 8400 GS PCI Express x16 Motherboard: Intel Desktop Board DQ45CB I have applied patches from Tobias Geiger''s xen-devel mailing list thread (http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-05/msg00441.html) to Xen 4.0.2-rc1-pre. VGA Passthrough to Windows 7 Enterprise 90-day Trial is *partially* succes...

Dear All, Hypervisor: Xen 4.0.2-rc1-pre pv-ops dom0 kernel: 2.6.32.26 Distro: Fedora 11 Linux x86_64 Graphics card: NVIDIA Geforce 8400 GS PCI Express x16 Motherboard: Intel Desktop Board DQ45CB I have applied patches from Tobias Geiger''s xen-devel mailing list thread (http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-05/msg00441.html) to Xen 4.0.2-rc1-pre. VGA Passthrough to Windows 7 Enterprise 90-day Trial is *partially* succes...

...irst column X is at the right position, but the remaining columns X1-Xn should be ordered like this: X1, X2, X3 etc instead of like below. > colnames(pos1) [1] "X" "X1" "X10" "X11" "X12" "X13" "X14" "X15" "X16" "X17" "X18" "X19" "X2" "X20" "X3" "X4" "X5" "X6" "X7" "X8" "X9" > pos1[1:5,1:5] X X1 X10 X11 X12 1 100.5 7949.469 18509.064 8484....

I had posted a question recently on this list regarding the new series of cards from 3ware, and wanted to follow up with some real-world results. My test motherboard was an Intel D945GTPLKR (a desktop board). I was able to use the motherboard video and plug the 3ware card into the PCIe x16 slot. The card I was testing with (16ML) is a PCIe x8 card. Hardware-wise, everything worked without a hitch. Kinda cool to be able to get high bus performance out of a desktop motherboard. I guess we all can thank the gamers for that. The driver in the currently-shipping CentOS kernel (2.6...

Hi, Does anyone know if it is possible to plug a tdm400p pci digium card into an pci-e 16x slot ? Is there a possibility to work? I have a sun fire x2100 which doesn't have pci slots. Does Digium make pci-e cards?

Dear All, I have just estimated this model: ----------------------------------------------------------- Logistic Regression Model lrm(formula = Y ~ X16, x = T, y = T) Model Likelihood Discrimination Rank Discrim. Ratio Test Indexes Indexes Obs 82 LR chi2 5.58 R2 0.088 C 0.607 0 46 d.f. 1 g 0.488 Dxy...

...6 ), X13 = c(295.947601318359, 297.934448242188, 298.745391845703, 297.704925537109, 298.819091796875), X14 = c(294.654327392578, 296.722717285156, 297.0986328125, 296.508239746094, 297.822021484375 ), X15 = c(292.176361083984, 294.49658203125, 293.888305664062, 294.172149658203, 296.117095947266), X16 = c(288.400726318359, 291.029113769531, 289.361907958984, 290.566772460938, 293.554016113281 ), X17 = c(285.665222167969, 288.293029785156, 286.118957519531, 288.105285644531, 291.429382324219), X18 = c(285.971252441406, 288.3798828125, 286.444580078125, 288.495880126953, 291.447326660156 ), X19 =...

...t errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported- RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+ MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr+ FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr- TransPend- LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 <256ns, L1 <4us ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk- ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt- LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, TrErr- Train- SlotCl...

...t errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported- RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+ MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr+ FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr- TransPend- LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 <256ns, L1 <4us ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk- ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt- LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, TrErr- Train- SlotCl...

Dear all, I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step by step. When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have "segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time. My questions are: 1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula? 2. Why does the same function behave differently under...

Dear all, I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step by step. When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have "segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time. My questions are: 1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula? 2. Why does the same function behave differently under...

...anchFolding.cpp) is merging common code from BB#14 and BB#15 into BB#16. It's clear that there are 4 common instructions (marked with an *) in BB#14 and BB#15: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BB#14: derived from LLVM BB %if.end.1 Live Ins: %X16 %X17 %X18 %X7 %X0 %X6 %X4 %W8 %X15 %X14 %W3 %W2 %X1 %X10 %X11 %X12 %X13 %X9 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#12 %X5<def> = ADDXrr %X16, %X13 * %W19<def> = LDRBBui %X5, 1; mem:LD1[%scevgep95](tbaa=<0x6e02518>) * %W3<def> = MADDWrrr %W2<kill>, %W...

...; +#define __virtio_pick_value(x, type, then, otherwise) \ > + __builtin_choose_expr(__same_type(x, type), then, otherwise) > + > +#define __virtio_pick_type(x, type, then, otherwise) \ > + __virtio_pick_value(x, type, (then)0, otherwise) > + > +#define __virtio_pick_endian(x, x16, x32, x64, otherwise) \ > + __virtio_pick_type(x, x16, __u16, \ > + __virtio_pick_type(x, x32, __u32, \ > + __virtio_pick_type(x, x64, __u64, \ > + otherwise))) > + > +#define __virtio_native_typeof(x) typeof( \ > + __virtio_pick_type(x, __u8, __u8, \ &...

...State */ silk_nsq_state *NSQ, /* I/O NSQ state */ SideInfoIndices *psIndices, /* I/O Quantization Indices */ const opus_int16 x16[], /* I Input */ @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static OPUS_INLINE void silk_noise_shape_quantizer_del_dec( opus_int predictLPCOrder, /* I Prediction filter order */ opus_int warping_Q16,...

Hi everybody, If I've a data frame like this: dataframe a X0 X2 X4 X6 X8 X10 X12 X14 X16 1957 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1958 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1959 831 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1960 544 282 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1961 446 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1962 442 473 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1963 595 468 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1964 400 397...

NSQ_LPC_BUF_LENGTH is independent of DECISION_DELAY. --- silk/define.h | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/silk/define.h b/silk/define.h index 781cfdc..1286048 100644 --- a/silk/define.h +++ b/silk/define.h @@ -173,11 +173,7 @@ extern "C" #define MAX_MATRIX_SIZE MAX_LPC_ORDER /* Max of LPC Order and LTP order */ -#if( MAX_LPC_ORDER >