Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "x1544".
Did you mean:
1544
2009 Oct 08
2
[Bug 613] New: iptables not accepting RELATED, ESTABLISHED udp packets
...ackets=1
bytes=135 [UNREPLIED] src=63.97.78.114 dst=70.218.8.48 sport=162 dport=41329
packets=0 bytes=0 mark=0 use=2
TCP packets seem to work fine. I originally thought that this was simply a
limitation of using UDP packets, but after reading this
http://www.linuxtopia.org/Linux_Firewall_iptables/x1544.html, I feel that
RELATED,ESTABLISHED UDP packets should work with iptables. I have verified
that the sent UDP packet was sent successful and that the returned UDP packet
has the dport set to the original sent packet's sport. Is this a bug or is my
rule incorrect?
--
Configure bugmail: htt...
2020 May 26
3
ip6tables equivalent for NAT?
with ipv6, you just allow the specific ports destined to the specific local
machine(s) in on your WAN side, they don't need translating. same sort of
rule as if you had a internet-facing service running on the routing system
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com>
wrote:
> I finally got an ISP connection with working IPv6 and now I need to add