Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "x0nmlmp8fdgbmk5unk9mo00".
2007 Dec 03
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM footprint
...-
Benjamin Smedberg
Platform Guru
Mozilla Corporation
benjamin at smedbergs.us
http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHVHOiSSwGp5sTYNkRAlntAJ4halntb60Dva5V2IIyIrAD3UWOgACgnUoW
x0NMLmP8fDgBmk5uNK9Mo00=
=u8aN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2007 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM footprint
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> What is the expected footprint of a tool using the LLVM JIT?
Right now it's ~1.5 to 2M for one platform, at least on darwin.
> I have created a simple project that uses the LLVM C++ API to JIT calls
> to XPCOM method signature... it works well, but the component DLL is
> very large (Linux x86-74, 5.8MB optimized and stripped). Is
2007 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM footprint
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
What is the expected footprint of a tool using the LLVM JIT?
I have created a simple project that uses the LLVM C++ API to JIT calls to
XPCOM method signature... it works well, but the component DLL is very large
(Linux x86-74, 5.8MB optimized and stripped). Is this normal? Am I linking
to "too much" or not using the correct link flags?