search for: wvw

...wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:02:45 +0200 > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Yes, the objects in question are displayed, one of them looks like > > this: > > > > # record 46 > > dn: > > CN=projekt-st.wendel-wvw-technisch-ökonomische-rw,CN=Users,DC=iww,DC=lan > > cn:: cHJvamVrdC1zdC53ZW5kZWwtd3Z3LXRlY2huaXNjaC3Dtmtvbm9taXNjaGUtcnc= > > instanceType: 4 whenCreated: 20180720113100.0Z > > uSNCreated: 5982 > > name:: > > cHJvamVrdC1zdC53ZW5kZWwtd3Z3LXRlY2huaXNjaC3Dtmtvbm9taXNjaGUt...

...sam.ldb > > This will display everything in the editor and you can then search in > that for the groups. You should then be able to create a filter to > delete the groups Yes, the objects in question are displayed, one of them looks like this: # record 46 dn: CN=projekt-st.wendel-wvw-technisch-ökonomische-rw,CN=Users,DC=iww,DC=lan cn:: cHJvamVrdC1zdC53ZW5kZWwtd3Z3LXRlY2huaXNjaC3Dtmtvbm9taXNjaGUtcnc= instanceType: 4 whenCreated: 20180720113100.0Z uSNCreated: 5982 name:: cHJvamVrdC1zdC53ZW5kZWwtd3Z3LXRlY2huaXNjaC3Dtmtvbm9taXNjaGUtcnc= objectGUID: ecbda919-4c16-4d06-9695-2540e35b4...

...5 +0200 > > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, the objects in question are displayed, one of them looks like > > > this: > > > > > > # record 46 > > > dn: > > > CN=projekt-st.wendel-wvw-technisch-ökonomische-rw,CN=Users,DC=iww,DC=lan > > > cn:: > > > cHJvamVrdC1zdC53ZW5kZWwtd3Z3LXRlY2huaXNjaC3Dtmtvbm9taXNjaGUtcnc= > > > instanceType: 4 whenCreated: 20180720113100.0Z uSNCreated: 5982 > > > name:: > > > cHJvamVrdC1zdC53ZW5kZWwtd3Z3LXRlY2h...

...editor and you can then search > > in that for the groups. You should then be able to create a filter > > to delete the groups > > > > Yes, the objects in question are displayed, one of them looks like > this: > > # record 46 > dn: > CN=projekt-st.wendel-wvw-technisch-ökonomische-rw,CN=Users,DC=iww,DC=lan > cn:: cHJvamVrdC1zdC53ZW5kZWwtd3Z3LXRlY2huaXNjaC3Dtmtvbm9taXNjaGUtcnc= > instanceType: 4 whenCreated: 20180720113100.0Z > uSNCreated: 5982 > name:: > cHJvamVrdC1zdC53ZW5kZWwtd3Z3LXRlY2huaXNjaC3Dtmtvbm9taXNjaGUtcnc= > objectGUID: ecb...

...ng in the editor and you can then search in > > that for the groups. You should then be able to create a filter to > > delete the groups > > > > Yes, the objects in question are displayed, one of them looks like this: > > # record 46 > dn: CN=projekt-st.wendel-wvw-technisch-ökonomische-rw,CN=Users,DC=iww,DC=lan > cn:: cHJvamVrdC1zdC53ZW5kZWwtd3Z3LXRlY2huaXNjaC3Dtmtvbm9taXNjaGUtcnc= > instanceType: 4 > whenCreated: 20180720113100.0Z > uSNCreated: 5982 > name:: cHJvamVrdC1zdC53ZW5kZWwtd3Z3LXRlY2huaXNjaC3Dtmtvbm9taXNjaGUtcnc= > objectGUID: ecb...

Hello, after migration from a NT style domain to Samba AD (running 4.7.8) with the classicupgrade method I have two group objects in the AD tree with german umlauts which I can't access or delete. When I try I get a error which says literally "object not found on the server". Same when using other LDAP tools. It's not a great problem, but how can I get rid of this two group

Team: My Debian Sarge "testing" box got upgraded from Samba 2.2.6, I believe, to Samba 3 Beta 2 in the latest dist-upgrade supplied spate of updates (90+, and I missed Sambe being in there . . . ). Not a big deal except that now I have lost access to the logon profiles directories at logon time. It's a basic Samba setup. Uses Unix passwords and Unix accounts, etc. Nothing fancy

...UB1bmluc3VicmlhLml0PohZBBMRAgAZBQI+NGsPBAsH AwIDFQIDAxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBmFqXVbV6HRrtGAJ0SbS6+kPfexAVv0FPBTJhg O1AzUgCeIfTup9PskKkzxm7oDCBA7R4fd3G5AQ0EPjRrEhAEAPBhd6KNwUavukYs rKAg4Psf8XxS9PwPnqiCusGKHDsIRe9eRH4ts/e6olr8vccHBbpTtj191gQ42GYS fZhmPUDeZC/H58bL5Rfwpv3zH8nZnu5zBwbFyC6fA1InOW/K0JUfN1gLphGk+wVW yECOMoAgGTzc+FVPInnFtLWWVGWXAAMFA/9gatgWAk0mAYnRqBg1V0qxicks17/O GQzFrkiICROfihhjiQd0c37VziUup7tLGl3QQw54Ah2xkbqwIz70lmoeK1Ur7y05 5kqYx2YFGe2JNyLzi3jYZG5j9SKOhXwpEii4mEyUFHm1qUIllm36Hk6233FSyFcw XU/PCqZXXa583IhGBBgRAgAGBQI+NGsSAAoJEGYWpdVtXodGRrMAn0ydvZjO+uKt NeE2431kFSchaxUGAKDEfNuuzBiVutwAX/huqYN...

...UB1bmluc3VicmlhLml0PohZBBMRAgAZBQI+NGsPBAsH AwIDFQIDAxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBmFqXVbV6HRrtGAJ0SbS6+kPfexAVv0FPBTJhg O1AzUgCeIfTup9PskKkzxm7oDCBA7R4fd3G5AQ0EPjRrEhAEAPBhd6KNwUavukYs rKAg4Psf8XxS9PwPnqiCusGKHDsIRe9eRH4ts/e6olr8vccHBbpTtj191gQ42GYS fZhmPUDeZC/H58bL5Rfwpv3zH8nZnu5zBwbFyC6fA1InOW/K0JUfN1gLphGk+wVW yECOMoAgGTzc+FVPInnFtLWWVGWXAAMFA/9gatgWAk0mAYnRqBg1V0qxicks17/O GQzFrkiICROfihhjiQd0c37VziUup7tLGl3QQw54Ah2xkbqwIz70lmoeK1Ur7y05 5kqYx2YFGe2JNyLzi3jYZG5j9SKOhXwpEii4mEyUFHm1qUIllm36Hk6233FSyFcw XU/PCqZXXa583IhGBBgRAgAGBQI+NGsSAAoJEGYWpdVtXodGRrMAn0ydvZjO+uKt NeE2431kFSchaxUGAKDEfNuuzBiVutwAX/huqYN...

...UB1bmluc3VicmlhLml0PohZBBMRAgAZBQI+NGsPBAsH AwIDFQIDAxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBmFqXVbV6HRrtGAJ0SbS6+kPfexAVv0FPBTJhg O1AzUgCeIfTup9PskKkzxm7oDCBA7R4fd3G5AQ0EPjRrEhAEAPBhd6KNwUavukYs rKAg4Psf8XxS9PwPnqiCusGKHDsIRe9eRH4ts/e6olr8vccHBbpTtj191gQ42GYS fZhmPUDeZC/H58bL5Rfwpv3zH8nZnu5zBwbFyC6fA1InOW/K0JUfN1gLphGk+wVW yECOMoAgGTzc+FVPInnFtLWWVGWXAAMFA/9gatgWAk0mAYnRqBg1V0qxicks17/O GQzFrkiICROfihhjiQd0c37VziUup7tLGl3QQw54Ah2xkbqwIz70lmoeK1Ur7y05 5kqYx2YFGe2JNyLzi3jYZG5j9SKOhXwpEii4mEyUFHm1qUIllm36Hk6233FSyFcw XU/PCqZXXa583IhGBBgRAgAGBQI+NGsSAAoJEGYWpdVtXodGRrMAn0ydvZjO+uKt NeE2431kFSchaxUGAKDEfNuuzBiVutwAX/huqYN...

I''d like to enhance Solaris network configuration slightly to allow guest domain IPv4 details to be passed from the domain building control tools through to the relevant components in Solaris (svc:/network/physical and uts/common/fs/nfs/nfs_dlinet.c). Attached is a proposal, roughly in the form of a fasttrack. Diffs for a prototype are at:

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

...FZ z9Fp1SY&dQ=>K%HBh}3-*<{T}6r9^`B3oQNFxDvz}L_kV`+}KgTmdrM8P(iI&`oBnf z5AevY@?iM8qbYZKku<uREuMAB8j$5Jw%1-#zFBGH9jt~lvUiEeeMU1^yTguV#N5%Y zL_VGeLhlX`AP~|_5(w=}=#b9_5;`ROgc3+X?<EjQLihicbIv_?X0*1++PZU3y{EqC zJ#SS>;dbpJiV+UrlIgAHj?)5oyUZ#ZQ93AVD46cGOU32<<<TZ<c7Vr`wFg)LwvWS* z6g&iGARwcR-jI6C8w2ekcsz&{Q~4!5Z`2;-AY^RRKD*sh5FKaajd1E&n8-FtYPk`i zwwCF)#*wsjR!P?G=X#7w?uJz9YwfN&y_}{Js}$oTn}r%c{i=4vcJHI_lD;0vnaQqY zq*krs;Bb2x&Z8z4N6+y1HIzy^p(0URwvvt(JbBW#pZO9~+GTE>&7(5^NSi|~I@?ng zR3)qhTpBf-#3t0|o{8|I#K#jyD0kb9&^4*rG5PXT?L;X8r#r?`_{zCX?TTFRA}z9...

Triple Release Day! James Wan, from the Solaris Quality Engineering group, has released the Megacli test suite. More information on Megacli test suite can be found at: http://opensolaris.org/os/community/storage/tests/ http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/test/ontest-stc2/src/suites/storage/megacli/README http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/test/ontest-stc2/src/suites/storage/megacli/

I''ve implemented code to send out bogus gratuitous ARP packet from vna in order to fix CR 6701114. The webrev is at: http://jurassic.eng/net/consulte.prc/export/build/xvm-6701114/webrev Some backgroud information (see CR 6701114 for more detail): During live migration of an xVM domain from one dom0 to another, the VNIC will be moved from one switch port to another. But, the