search for: wvf

...ely to be effective, > because we currently don't have a good way of undoing compiler > transformations. > > I think that a simple if-converter will be a good place to start. What > do you think ? Quick comment: IIRC, Ralf Karrenberg has already implemented this (as part of his WVF project: https://github.com/karrenberg/wfv/tree/llvm_30). It might be worthwhile to work on cleaning up his implementation instead of starting from scratch. -Hal > > > I've written a dependence analyzer that ought to be suitable > > (if it isn't, we should fix it). >...

...euna/+uY5/7MR8 > 9EpFwss94eu4PyFgAfOm2Al+IOT98LP1N9OHs3Za2r/2W7LKaesgjCa3vBfH9IjZ > okUj7fsQXsTAM+UqtF+ne3f5Vp6Ng36Irabr5HLptlbIu3lq8ALMm/E/72TabVLl > Lln7bB/YFftnrTlI2HheRLnAwSOMHu4rNE7G9zLqiPEipD5XsqgDBPpAM6PwPmbi > k/irSUgq8h4b66LCzo6Ekv6lvKzWxQpzJo0MC99HT0syAP/qpyLbPARhQvDXCH7J > wvf/T19EAt+OC4zzfIPgL2YxRP5ZN5efr82NLYdiMVfAcBaDHaFWTA== > =8upy > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >

...; because we currently don't have a good way of undoing compiler >> transformations. >> >> I think that a simple if-converter will be a good place to start. What >> do you think ? > > Quick comment: IIRC, Ralf Karrenberg has already implemented this (as part of his WVF project: https://github.com/karrenberg/wfv/tree/llvm_30). It might be worthwhile to work on cleaning up his implementation instead of starting from scratch. > > -Hal WFV [1] does indeed include phases that correspond to full control-flow to data-flow conversion (not just if-conversion, it...

...PyFgAfOm2Al+IOT98LP1N9OHs3Za2r/2W7LKaesgjCa3vBfH9IjZ >>> okUj7fsQXsTAM+UqtF+ne3f5Vp6Ng36Irabr5HLptlbIu3lq8ALMm/E/72TabVLl >>> Lln7bB/YFftnrTlI2HheRLnAwSOMHu4rNE7G9zLqiPEipD5XsqgDBPpAM6PwPmbi >>> k/irSUgq8h4b66LCzo6Ekv6lvKzWxQpzJo0MC99HT0syAP/qpyLbPARhQvDXCH7J >>> wvf/T19EAt+OC4zzfIPgL2YxRP5ZN5efr82NLYdiMVfAcBaDHaFWTA== >>> =8upy >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >>> >> > - -- Steffen Kaiser > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iQEVAwUBVOw+O3z1H7kL/d9rAQIaZAf+MTnOlpm92TbjdWLCNp3THyjUHM...

...ely to be effective, > because we currently don't have a good way of undoing compiler > transformations. > > I think that a simple if-converter will be a good place to start. What > do you think ? Quick comment: IIRC, Ralf Karrenberg has already implemented this (as part of his WVF project: https://github.com/karrenberg/wfv/tree/llvm_30). It might be worthwhile to work on cleaning up his implementation instead of starting from scratch. -Hal > > > I've written a dependence analyzer that ought to be suitable > > (if it isn't, we should fix it). >...

...W7LKaesgjCa3vBfH9IjZ >>>>> okUj7fsQXsTAM+UqtF+ne3f5Vp6Ng36Irabr5HLptlbIu3lq8ALMm/E/72TabVLl >>>>> Lln7bB/YFftnrTlI2HheRLnAwSOMHu4rNE7G9zLqiPEipD5XsqgDBPpAM6PwPmbi >>>>> k/irSUgq8h4b66LCzo6Ekv6lvKzWxQpzJo0MC99HT0syAP/qpyLbPARhQvDXCH7J >>>>> wvf/T19EAt+OC4zzfIPgL2YxRP5ZN5efr82NLYdiMVfAcBaDHaFWTA== >>>>> =8upy >>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> - -- Steffen Kaiser >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuP...

...QJxAgf/dNt0dBGANbIGvm6B0Oeuna/+uY5/7MR8 9EpFwss94eu4PyFgAfOm2Al+IOT98LP1N9OHs3Za2r/2W7LKaesgjCa3vBfH9IjZ okUj7fsQXsTAM+UqtF+ne3f5Vp6Ng36Irabr5HLptlbIu3lq8ALMm/E/72TabVLl Lln7bB/YFftnrTlI2HheRLnAwSOMHu4rNE7G9zLqiPEipD5XsqgDBPpAM6PwPmbi k/irSUgq8h4b66LCzo6Ekv6lvKzWxQpzJo0MC99HT0syAP/qpyLbPARhQvDXCH7J wvf/T19EAt+OC4zzfIPgL2YxRP5ZN5efr82NLYdiMVfAcBaDHaFWTA== =8upy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hello there, first time writing. I'm relatively new to linux and have been tasked with setting up the following configuration: Debian Wheezy Server Postfix Dovecot OpenLDAP So, I set up the Server, installed and configured postfix, ldap and dovecot (in that order) and now simply try to log into the mail account with a used from the LDAP over telnet. The test looks like this: *|> telnet

...gt; 9EpFwss94eu4PyFgAfOm2Al+IOT98LP1N9OHs3Za2r/2W7LKaesgjCa3vBfH9IjZ >> okUj7fsQXsTAM+UqtF+ne3f5Vp6Ng36Irabr5HLptlbIu3lq8ALMm/E/72TabVLl >> Lln7bB/YFftnrTlI2HheRLnAwSOMHu4rNE7G9zLqiPEipD5XsqgDBPpAM6PwPmbi >> k/irSUgq8h4b66LCzo6Ekv6lvKzWxQpzJo0MC99HT0syAP/qpyLbPARhQvDXCH7J >> wvf/T19EAt+OC4zzfIPgL2YxRP5ZN5efr82NLYdiMVfAcBaDHaFWTA== >> =8upy >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEVAwUBVOw+O3z1H7kL/d9rAQIaZAf+MTnOlpm92TbjdWLCNp3THyjUHMaHDmHt /EuAXa7P0r16tuBHXNuWAohSzG80ZF6ALxg1EhtFkFdH...

...8LP1N9OHs3Za2r/2W7LKaesgjCa3vBfH9IjZ >>>> okUj7fsQXsTAM+UqtF+ne3f5Vp6Ng36Irabr5HLptlbIu3lq8ALMm/E/72TabVLl >>>> Lln7bB/YFftnrTlI2HheRLnAwSOMHu4rNE7G9zLqiPEipD5XsqgDBPpAM6PwPmbi >>>> k/irSUgq8h4b66LCzo6Ekv6lvKzWxQpzJo0MC99HT0syAP/qpyLbPARhQvDXCH7J >>>> wvf/T19EAt+OC4zzfIPgL2YxRP5ZN5efr82NLYdiMVfAcBaDHaFWTA== >>>> =8upy >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> >>>> >>> >> - -- Steffen Kaiser >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1 >> >> iQEVAwUBVOw+O3z1H7...

Hi Preston! > > I'd start by making a plan (a design!) with goals and stuff. > Publish it so we can see what you mean by "vectorization". I will send a separate email later, but here is a quick overview. I see the vectorizer having four main components: 1. Preparation passes: If-conversion, loop transformations, etc. 2. Cost model - This unit decides on the best

...9IjZ >>>>>> okUj7fsQXsTAM+UqtF+ne3f5Vp6Ng36Irabr5HLptlbIu3lq8ALMm/E/72TabVLl >>>>>> Lln7bB/YFftnrTlI2HheRLnAwSOMHu4rNE7G9zLqiPEipD5XsqgDBPpAM6PwPmbi >>>>>> k/irSUgq8h4b66LCzo6Ekv6lvKzWxQpzJo0MC99HT0syAP/qpyLbPARhQvDXCH7J >>>>>> wvf/T19EAt+OC4zzfIPgL2YxRP5ZN5efr82NLYdiMVfAcBaDHaFWTA== >>>>>> =8upy >>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> - -- Steffen Kaiser >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----...

...doing compiler > >> transformations. > >> > >> I think that a simple if-converter will be a good place to start. > >> What > >> do you think ? > > > > Quick comment: IIRC, Ralf Karrenberg has already implemented this > > (as part of his WVF project: > > https://github.com/karrenberg/wfv/tree/llvm_30). It might be > > worthwhile to work on cleaning up his implementation instead of > > starting from scratch. > > > > -Hal > > WFV [1] does indeed include phases that correspond to full > control-fl...

Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > I sent a patch to llvm-commit with a new loop vectorizer. > This is a very simple loop vectorizer, but we have to start somewhere. > With this new loop vectorizer we can already vectorize a good number of loops. > I know that we can improve the new loop vectorizer in a number of ways. > We can implement a precise dependence test, >