search for: wscaled

Thanks for the tips, Tom. Here is the tcpdump -n output on the dmz computer - this gets repeated several times as the remote computer attempts to connect: 18:11:54.264580 66.113.134.243.55080 > 192.168.2.1.8082: S 3210481212:3210481212(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 65650966 0,nop,wscale 0> (DF) 18:11:54.264696 192.168.2.1.8082 > 66.113.134.243.55080: S

Hi Ravi, back to our client-cannot-reconnect-to-gluster-brick problem ... > Von: Ravishankar N [ravishankar at redhat.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 29. Mai 2017 06:34 > An: Markus Stockhausen; gluster-users at gluster.org > Betreff: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster heal entry reappears > > > On 05/28/2017 10:31 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm

Does anyone have any idea what to try next? Here are the steps I have taken and the problem: (I wanted to post my question on the first line before I explained the problem and what I have tried) ---------- Node 0 has the file system mounted just fine and works great. When trying to mount on Node 1: `mount.ocfs2 /dev/mapper/data /cluster/ data` I get this error after about 30 seconds:

Hello, I have an issue with multiple connections to the Internet. I tried following the steps described in [1] but things are not working properly. I would like the network setup as follows: ______ | |- ppp0 -- Dynamic IP (PPPoE on eth2) Internal---- eth0 | GW | |____|- eth1 -- Static IP -> Static''s GW From [1], the

We are using Centos behind an F5 Bigip load balancer. The linux box is using bonding and tagged VLAN's Everything works fine except that when traffic is forwarded from the BigIP to the linux box on the VLAN where the web server is running the linux box returns the traffic on the wrong VLAN, It returns traffic on the lowest ordered VLAN. ie. here is a tcpdump on my load balancer showing

Hi, I have a linux box with two dsl modems on it (connection is done via pppoe), I''m trying to route default traffic on the primary connection (ppp0) and mail traffic on another one (ppp1). This traffic will come from the localhost. I run Slackware 9.1 (Kernel 2.4.22), recompiled with necessary options for using iproute2. According to the advanced routing howto, I did the following

Thomas B. R?cker (il 30/07/2014 23:26) ha scritto: You could run "tcpdump -ni eth0 port 8000" and try to access the > icecast web interface. If you don't see any output, then traffic to port > 8000 is blocked externally. good point of view. Ok, let's try: root at mail2:/home/spaziouser# tcpdump -ni eth0 port 8000 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097 Bug ID: 1097 Summary: TARPIT function does not work in ip6tables Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip6_tables (kernel) Assignee:

Last week, I started seeing very strange behavior in one of the networks that I manage. The office LAN uses a Linux firewall which masquerades their workstations over their DSL connection. There are probably ~75 workstations in the office LAN. Their mail server is in a collocated facility nearby. That server has an RFC1918 address; its router does SNAT to forward packets to the system. Both

Hello, I am running Shorewall 2.0.2f, on SuSE 9.2 distro, kernel 2.6.8-24.11-default My ip addr show output is as follows: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0:

Before I get too far in my attempts... Has anyone already implemented support in scp for larger buffers/windows that would take advantage of wscaled TCP windows? Paul Hyder NOAA Forecast Systems Lab Boulder, CO FYI: Linux 2.4.20, 30-80ms RTT, data rates 100-1000Mbps, and a need to fill TCP windows of 2-8MBytes. (Existing limits appear to be about 256KB.)

Hi I have a strange problem. I have a firewall with 3 nics. 1 - lan 2 - leased line or diginet 3 - connected to adsl modem I have 2 tables in defined in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 200 diginet 201 adsl The ADSL modem has an IP of 192.168.0.1 and is configured to initiate the PPPOE connection. I can mark packets within the network destined for port 80 successfully: ip ro add default via x.x.x.x

Hello, Stephen, thank you for input. Yes, these servers have the same firewall rules, and both of them have the same problem from time to time, most of time they are good. Actually, these servers are newly installed to be used as the Glusterfs storage server, so not much data flowing at this time. >From the sysctl output, I suppose it can't be a conntrack table overflow :

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035 Summary: rsync hangs in solaris Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: nestor.urquiza at gmail.com QAContact:

On my network, when a mac client tries to access a windows share, they are presented with a dialog box, prompting them for the share to connect and then the authentication credentials. However, when a mac client tires to connect to a samba share, it immediately receive a dialog box with the error: "Could not connect to the sever because the name or password is not correct.". Does

I''m having another little problem with my new firewall. I want outgoing port 25 from my mail server to appear on the address 65.223.121.227 so I created the file masq: eth2 192.168.124.18 65.223.121.227 tcp 25 eth1 eth5 eth1 eth3 eth1 eth4 eth1 == net0 == 209.189.103.196/27 eth2 == net1 == 65.223.121.237/28 eth3 == dmz0 eth4 == dmz1 eth5 == loc ==

I'm haveing trouble connecting an Ericsson Webswitch 100 to asterisk. Has anyone gotten a Webswitch running? When I try to connect asterisk thinks everything works fine, while the webswitch just rings. I belive chan_h323 is picking the wrong port to talk at the webswitch on, however I'm not sure, nor am I sure how to fix it. Any clues/hints? A tcpdump is attached to show the session.

Hi?guys. There is a wierd problem with iptables recently, hopes somebody can help me. I have installed Centos 7.2.1511 on a bare metal Dell server these days, disabled firewalld and enabled iptables.services, and setup a group of very simple rules, as the following: # iptables-save # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.21 on Tue Apr 23 09:15:14 2019 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=429 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-01-25 11:00 MET ------- Please specifically tell us about the exact kernel version, any patches that you might have applied, and the iptables version that you're using. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You

On 27.06.2018 14:12, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Can I also point that if you can only connect by IP, then you probably > have a DNS issue. > > Rowland > I dont think so. root at kes-srv-007:/var/log/samba# getent hosts kes-srv-007.kes 192.168.30.19 kes-srv-007.kes root at kes-srv-007:/var/log/samba# smbclient -U 'KES\user' \\\\kes-srv-007.kes\\websrv Enter