Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "wrprotect".
Did you mean:
protect
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 5/6] i386 virtualization - Make generic set wrprotect a macro
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 04:00:39PM -0700, zach@vmware.com wrote:
> Make the generic version of ptep_set_wrprotect a macro. This is good for
> code uniformity, and fixes the build for architectures which include pgtable.h
> through headers into assembly code, but do not define a ptep_set_wrprotect
> function.
This against the kernel coding style.
In fact, we are usually doing exactly the opposite....
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 5/6] i386 virtualization - Make generic set wrprotect a macro
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 04:00:39PM -0700, zach@vmware.com wrote:
> Make the generic version of ptep_set_wrprotect a macro. This is good for
> code uniformity, and fixes the build for architectures which include pgtable.h
> through headers into assembly code, but do not define a ptep_set_wrprotect
> function.
This against the kernel coding style.
In fact, we are usually doing exactly the opposite....
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 0/6] i386 virtualization patches, Set 3
This round attempts to conclude all of the LDT related cleanup with some
finally nice looking LDT code, fixes for the UML build, a bugfix for
really rather nasty kprobes problems, and the basic framework for an LDT
test suite. It is really rather unfortunate that this code is so
difficult to test, even with DOSemu and Wine, there are still very nasty
corner cases here - anyone want an iret to
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 0/6] i386 virtualization patches, Set 3
This round attempts to conclude all of the LDT related cleanup with some
finally nice looking LDT code, fixes for the UML build, a bugfix for
really rather nasty kprobes problems, and the basic framework for an LDT
test suite. It is really rather unfortunate that this code is so
difficult to test, even with DOSemu and Wine, there are still very nasty
corner cases here - anyone want an iret to