search for: written

...the following bug: The basic outline of the problematic section of the script: # parts is a data.table with 88 rows mc_ret <- parallel::mclapply(sample.int(nrow(parts)), function(i) { # do some data wrangling and write the result to a file # ... print(paste0("part ", i, " written successfully.")) return(TRUE) }, mc.preschedule = FALSE, mc.cores = 2L) str(mc_ret) Expected output: "part i written successfully." is printed 88 times, once for each value of i. mc_ret is a list of length 88, each element being TRUE. Its structure is printed once. All outputs a...

Hi, I am trying to install Samba 2.2.8a on Solaris 2.6 using GCC 2.95 but somewhere it seems to fail. I am not that experienced with compiling and stuff but I took a look at config.log and see a few error messages but its not clear to me where it went wrong. Attached to this message I have the config.log (zipped) Hope anyone of you can help me out here. Thanks!

...ne of the problematic section of the script: > > # parts is a data.table with 88 rows > mc_ret <- parallel::mclapply(sample.int(nrow(parts)), function(i) { > # do some data wrangling and write the result to a file > # ... > > print(paste0("part ", i, " written successfully.")) > return(TRUE) > }, mc.preschedule = FALSE, mc.cores = 2L) > > str(mc_ret) > > > Expected output: "part i written successfully." is printed 88 times, once for each value of i. mc_ret is a list of length 88, each element being TRUE. Its struc...

...of the script: >> >> # parts is a data.table with 88 rows >> mc_ret <- parallel::mclapply(sample.int(nrow(parts)), function(i) { >> # do some data wrangling and write the result to a file >> # ... >> >> print(paste0("part ", i, " written successfully.")) >> return(TRUE) >> }, mc.preschedule = FALSE, mc.cores = 2L) >> >> str(mc_ret) >> >> >> Expected output: "part i written successfully." is printed 88 times, once for each value of i. mc_ret is a list of length 88, each ele...

...>>> # parts is a data.table with 88 rows >>> mc_ret <- parallel::mclapply(sample.int(nrow(parts)), function(i) { >>> # do some data wrangling and write the result to a file >>> # ... >>> >>> print(paste0("part ", i, " written successfully.")) >>> return(TRUE) >>> }, mc.preschedule = FALSE, mc.cores = 2L) >>> >>> str(mc_ret) >>> >>> >>> Expected output: "part i written successfully." is printed 88 times, once for each value of i. mc_ret is a...

...s a data.table with 88 rows >>>> mc_ret <- parallel::mclapply(sample.int(nrow(parts)), function(i) { >>>> # do some data wrangling and write the result to a file >>>> # ... >>>> >>>> print(paste0("part ", i, " written successfully.")) >>>> return(TRUE) >>>> }, mc.preschedule = FALSE, mc.cores = 2L) >>>> >>>> str(mc_ret) >>>> >>>> >>>> Expected output: "part i written successfully." is printed 88 times, once for...

...>>> mc_ret <- parallel::mclapply(sample.int(nrow(parts)), function(i) { >>>>>> # do some data wrangling and write the result to a file >>>>>> # ... >>>>>> >>>>>> print(paste0("part ", i, " written successfully.")) >>>>>> return(TRUE) >>>>>> }, mc.preschedule =3D FALSE, mc.cores =3D 2L) >>>>>> >>>>>> str(mc_ret) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Expected output: "part...

...>>> mc_ret <- parallel::mclapply(sample.int(nrow(parts)), function(i) { >>>>>> # do some data wrangling and write the result to a file >>>>>> # ... >>>>>> >>>>>> print(paste0("part ", i, " written successfully.")) >>>>>> return(TRUE) >>>>>> }, mc.preschedule =3D FALSE, mc.cores =3D 2L) >>>>>> >>>>>> str(mc_ret) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Expected output: "part...

...ads); num_reads=0; num_packets = 0; while(vorbis_bitrate_flushpacket(&vd,&op)){ /* push packed into file */ fwrite(op.packet,op.bytes,1,fp_outfile); num_packets++; fprintf(fp_enc_info,"samples consumed:%d\tnum blocks:%d\tbytes written:%d\tpackets written for block:%d\n",total_samples_consumed,num_blocks,op.bytes,num_packets); } } } has debug output: num_reads per blockout:3 samples consumed:2646 num blocks:1 bytes written:138 packets written for block:1 num_reads per blockout:0 samples cons...

How could one get started with a self-written function? I have a function written in .txt format, but can not find the way to import it to the R space. Would be very appreciated for help. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/run-a-slef-written-function-tp3356537p3356537.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive...

Hi, I have recently upgraded our web proxy to CentOS 5.6. Before the upgrade, squid was running fine. Since the upgrade, sometimes, squid crashes: > [root at stargate ~]# service squid status > squid dead but pid file exists Looking at log files, I think it could be related to logrotate stuff, > -rw-r----- 1 squid squid 42713088 May 3 04:02 store.log > -rw-r----- 1 squid squid

...cle.com> --- fs/ocfs2/file.c | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c index 62442e4..a49fa44 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c @@ -1918,8 +1918,10 @@ out_sems: mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); + if (written) + ret = written; mlog_exit(ret); - return written ? written : ret; + return ret; } static int ocfs2_splice_to_file(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, -- 1.6.2.5

Hi all, will anyone please share me some material on RHCE/RHCT, I am fighting for the Quality Engineer in RedHat, and that may help a lot in the coming written exam. Many thanks and Merry Christmas! Cheers, Xiaobo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081224/57086264/attachment-0003.html>

I have mostly succeeded in getting master and slave DNS servers operational. Mostly, because the zone file is not written when a zone is updated on the master server when the notify and transfer process happens. The slave DNS server gets the changes to the modified zone, but the slave zone file remains as before. I've found a few tutorials and lots of discussions, many of which talk about the slave's zone fil...

I installed asterisk 1.4.4 final ,but the cdr is not written any patch or tweaking can be done Regards ********************************************* No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views ex...

I have written several passes that have no pre-requisites for any previous LLVM native passes prior to my own. For those passes, I have verified that at least the following two approaches are equivalent in terms of executing those self-written passes and getting the correct results: #if...

The situation arises where I open a file to write a data.frame to it. with write.table. multiple lines are written to the file and the file is kept in Append=TRUE mode. If one sets the col.names to the names of the variables being written, you have output that looks like this... name1 name2 name3..... x x x x x x x x x name1 name2 name 3 x x...

...hus driver uses DESC_DRIVER to detect that device data in >descriptor is valid. Basically DESC_HW from v2 split in two? > >DESC_WRAP: used by device to poll. Driver sets it to a *different* >value every time it overwrites a descriptor. >How to achieve it? >since descriptors are written out in ring order, >simply maintain the current value internally (start value 1) and flip it >every time you overwrite the first descriptor. >Device leaves it intact when overwriting a descriptor. This is confusing me a bit. My understanding is: 1. the internally kept wrap value only fl...

...hus driver uses DESC_DRIVER to detect that device data in >descriptor is valid. Basically DESC_HW from v2 split in two? > >DESC_WRAP: used by device to poll. Driver sets it to a *different* >value every time it overwrites a descriptor. >How to achieve it? >since descriptors are written out in ring order, >simply maintain the current value internally (start value 1) and flip it >every time you overwrite the first descriptor. >Device leaves it intact when overwriting a descriptor. This is confusing me a bit. My understanding is: 1. the internally kept wrap value only fl...

...enabling this option, the CDR will be ended before executing the "h" extension and hangup handlers so that CDR values such as "end" and "billsec" may be retrieved inside of of this extension. I have explicitly set endbeforehexten=no, yet the CDR records are being written as soon as the operator hangs up the call (this is in a queue situation). If I insert Wait() in the dialplan where the comments "note CDR is already written by this point" are, I can query the database and see the CDR record. My dialplan excerpt is below. Is there a way to force the...