search for: wren

I'm moving this over to flac-users... Anyway, are you using Mike Wren's installer? I'm not familiar with that yet. Josh --- C&K Slagle <ckslagle@earthlink.net> wrote: > have winamp installed on a partitioned drive. > I installed the most recent version of Flac which includes the plugin > for > winamp. However, .flac files are not rec...

...5 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Rich Bowen wrote: > >> Hi, I'm Rich Bowen, the Community Manager at SourceForge. > > Thanks Rich. Replied directly to you CCing Ralph Giles who > has an SF.net account. Ralph's account is not currently attached to the project. Mike Wren is attached to the project (I saw his name in the archives) but he's not an admin, and also the email address that's attached to the account isn't valid any more. -- Rich Bowen rbowen at rcbowen.com Shosholoza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed.....

...ion times-out). Not all the time, but just enough to be annoying. I've looked through the logs and for settings in the .conf file and can't find anything obvious that I've overlooked. Can anyone help me with any parameters that might be causing this type of problem? Thanks so much! Wren Hunt Cambridge, MA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: wren.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 174 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070209/4395af82/attachment-0002.vcf> -------------- next part ------...

...prtconf -v doesn''t contain a line with ''biosdev'' if booted under xvm, which is why lumake works on regular Solaris. I''m happy to file a bug if this isn''t just me being boneheaded. My only question is what''s the correct cat/subcat. -- John Wren Kennedy Solaris RPE

...iled for some flavors of *nix and the way it needs to be compiled. If anyone has any ideas how to compile the FLAC utilities to the MacOS X platform, please contact me ASAP. Thanks for listening! -Ryan http://db.etree.org/schpider AIM: Schpider98 On Sunday, April 22, 2001, at 09:05 PM, Mike Wren wrote: > This is a fantastic selling point, and one that I've never really > thought > of. > > Back in the early days of etree (a whole three years ago ;) ), before > we > learned the virtues of MD5 sums for SHN downloads, I downloaded a > Hornsby > show from so...

...---Original Message----- From: flac-dev-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:flac-dev-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Matt Zimmerman Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 10:45 PM To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flac-dev] 24-bit audio? On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 07:48:52PM -0400, Mike Wren wrote: > Using the FLAC frontend with flac v1.0.2, I tried to encode a recently > recorded 24-bit mono wav to flac, but received the following error: > > options: -P 0 -b 4608 -m -l 12 -e -q 0 -r 0,6 -R 0 > gpt2002-06-01mono.wav: ERROR: unsupported bits per sample 24 > [...] >...

...you (or anyone else on this list) can keep track of selling points for FLAC over other current (and future) lossless codecs, I would like to compile a list, since I will be running propaganda to convert etree users to FLAC. It won't be an easy sell though. Hope everyone had a great weekend! Wren Josh Coalson wrote on 4/16/01 4:36 pm: >--- Mike Wren ><mikew@etree.org> wrote: >> ... >> >> I'm *still* working on >getting some etree.org >developers to help out, but I >> think as a whole, etree'ers >are stuck in their Shorten >frame-o...

I've checked in code that supports a new metadata block called SEEKTABLE. Basically, it is an optional, arbitrarily-long list of seek points, by sample number and stream offset. I also added command-line options to flac so you can specify seek points by specific sample number and/or a specific number of evenly-spaced seek points. The table cost about 18 bytes per seek point. This seems to

...e, being able to do word-length reduction on the fly. The only place I can find this feature is in the Monkey's Audio codec plugin, though. Anyway, great news Josh! Thanks for making 24-bit audio support in FLAC a priority. :) MW On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Mike Wren <mikew@etree.org> wrote: > > Awesome, I'm psyched for 1.0.3.... the ID3v1 winamp2 support will be > > a > > neat addition, as is the faster decodes. Will 24-bit audio play nice > > with > > the final public version of 1.0.3? > > yes, forgot to mention...

...wing error: options: -P 0 -b 4608 -m -l 12 -e -q 0 -r 0,6 -R 0 gpt2002-06-01mono.wav: ERROR: unsupported bits per sample 24 So, I tried to encode a stereo 24-bit wave file... same error. I'm using the .exe of flac v1.0.2 under Windows 2000. The wave files can be downloaded from: http://mikewren.com/audiotests/gpt2002-06-01mono.wav http://mikewren.com/audiotests/gpt2002-06-01stereo.wav Can anyone else reproduce this error? What's the resolution? MW

Awesome, I'm psyched for 1.0.3.... the ID3v1 winamp2 support will be a neat addition, as is the faster decodes. Will 24-bit audio play nice with the final public version of 1.0.3? MW On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Josh Coalson wrote: > One more thing... you will probably have to > > chmod +x flac-1.0.3_beta/test/test_streams.sh > > before doing the 'make check'. > >

On my lists of things to do for 1.0 were 1) improve seeking; and 2) speed up both encoding and decoding. Seeking seems better now (I added the SEEKTABLE and tweaked the search algorithm). On the way, one of my encoding experiments worked. By taking advantage of a relatively unused area in the Rice parameter space, I added an escape code for switching to flat encoding within a partition.

...uld be needed. Also, I would suggest that the name of this project be changed from "Free Lossless Audio Coder" to "Free Lossless Audio Codec". It's a matter of semantics, but important that we clear that up as early on as possible. Thanks! ---------------------- Mike Wren Server Team, Webmaster http://etree.org

Josh Coalson wrote: > yeah, flac doesn't have a 'gzip' fallback method > so any non-audio data will probably get stored > verbatim. I'm kind of reluctant to add a generic > compressor. If you wan't, you could come up with a > FLAC metadata block to store a gzip'ed chunk and I > could add that to the format. > I had the same thought when I was

...take advantage of this? Why not just a binary > META data block that > has some sort of identifier (a string maybe). That > would allow arbitrary > data to be stored. I've been thinking about this, and here's what I came up with. This kind of dovetails into the discussion Mike Wren started about the etree header. I was thinking about defining a FREEFORM metadata block which may be of arbitrary size. The only mandatory field would be a (say, 32-bit) id of the owner. In your case, you would request an id, then I would register you as the owner, then you could write as many F...

FLAC 0.8 is out. This version has gone through and passed the new (larger) test suite, so I'm much more confident in the encoder and decoder for all kinds of input. FLAC is much closer to an official version now. There are also some new features: I have added two metadata blocks: 1) a PADDING block, and 2) an APPLICATION block so third-party app developers can register for an ID and write

...how this seek data would be used: Why not just have the Winamp/XMMS plugin create this extra seek data on-the-fly? This may be too CPU intensive, however. Sorry for the stream of consciousness email... I'm more thinking (typing) out loud than anything else... ;) ---------------------- Mike Wren Server Team, Webmaster http://etree.org -----Original Message----- From: flac-dev-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:flac-dev-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Josh Coalson Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 2:07 AM To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Flac-dev] new SEEKTABLE block I...

...key's right from the start? I'm *still* working on getting some etree.org developers to help out, but I think as a whole, etree'ers are stuck in their Shorten frame-of-mind (creating workarounds for an old and very limited codec). Keep up the great work! ---------------------- Mike Wren Server Team, Webmaster http://etree.org -----Original Message----- From: flac-dev-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:flac-dev-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Josh Coalson Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 2:16 AM To: dev Subject: [Flac-dev] the road to 1.0... On my lists of things to do...

...e sector boundary issue, and why it is so important in CD audio. If there is any interest, I'll get going on some win98/NT batch files for DOS, and perhaps an auto-installer with registry keys. BTW, sorry I've been MIA in all this. All my play time has been consumed by other projects. Wren On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Josh Coalson wrote: > OK, I made a few reorganizations to the code I've been wanting > to do before 1.0. Nothing major, but if you are integrating > libFLAC into another program it will be of interest: > > First, I made changes so that the encoder is no...

I know this is probably a really stupid question, but why is FLAC's MD5 checksum different than the MD5 checksum of the original (input) .wav? I was under the impression that since each FLAC file contains metadata that can be changed without changing the audio (thus changing the MD5 checksum of that FLAC file) that the checksum of the original .wav file would instead be used. If that's