search for: wrappering

I'm writing wrappers for some functions that change some of the default arguments. I'd rather not list all of the arguments for the low level functions because there are about a dozen wrapper functions, and about 20 arguments to lowlevel. Instead I'm trying something like this: lowlevel <- function(longname = 1) { cat("longname = ", longname, "\n") }

Hello Guys, first of all, I'm very new with asterisk. I'm trying to set it up. I've already compiled and installed Asterisk-1.0.7 Now I'm trying with asterisk-oh323 I've already installed pwlib, oh323 and I've already set the variables. Now, when I try to "make" asterisk-oh323 I receive this error messagge: for x in wrapper asterisk-driver; do make -C $x all ||

The following code is a first attempt at a simple but flexible suid wrapper which checks argv[] and environment. It might introduce new security holes or have other bugs; using 1 as a general failure exit value may be the wrong thing to do. The wrapper reads a configuration file named /etc/wrapper.cfg; see the comments in wrapper.c for the file''s format. Flame, comment, or use at will.

Hi, I've tryed build dovecot with the lucene plugin but I have this is output: /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../../src/lib -I../../../src/lib-mail -I../../../src/lib-index -I../../../src/lib-storage -I../../../src/plugins/fts -I../../../src/doveadm -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/lib -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing

Have any body succesfully compiled the files in "asterisk-oh323-0.2.tar.gz" ? I have the following errors: +for x in wrapper asterisk-driver; do make -C $x all || exit 1 ; done make[1]: Entering directory `/root/asterisk-oh323/wrapper' g++ -Wall -mcpu=i586 -DP_LINUX -D_REENTRANT -DP_HAS_SEMAPHORES -DP_SSL -DP_PTHREADS -DPBYTE_ORDER=PLITTLE_ENDIAN -DPHAS_TEMPLATES -O3 -DNDEBUG

Hello I am trying to wrap some C++ classes into R. (1) Comparing the OOP and methods packages, I have came to this conclusion that OOP works much better for this wrapper -- please correct me if I am wrong. One question is why this useful package (OOP) is not included in the official release of R? (2) Choosing the OOP package way, I have carried out the following steps to wrap the C++

Howdy, It seems that even when specifying the --with-tcp-wrappers configure flag, the LIBWRAP define in config.h never gets #define'd and -lwrap never gets added to LIBS in the Makefile. To make sure I wasn't dealing with a stale configure file, I ran autoconf on configure.in to roll a new configure. I also don't see anything wrong with the --with-tcp-wrappers defined in

This is based on top of: https://github.com/nertpinx/v2v-conversion-host/commit/0bb2efdcacd975a2cae7380080991ac7fc238d2b The first 4 patches are fairly uncontroversial miscellaneous cleanups. Patch 5 is the interesting one. (Note it doesn't quite work yet, so it's for discussion only.) Patch 5 converts the inner loop to use asynchronous libnbd calls. performance improves quite a bit for

Hi Sean, > Rafael gave me some of the backstory on this. Basically it is to work around some buggy behavior in the Darwin ar. Adding that on the front of the bitcode file just to get a version doesn't seem > like a very clean thing to do. > > Doug, what other alternatives did you guys consider before settling on this? > > As for #2 above, the non-universality of the wrapper

If I actually finished writing this module, would any of you use it? Would you wish it did something else/different than what's described below? Any comments or suggestions on its proposed usage, intent, or syntax are welcome! (An alternative, better name would also be appreciated) -Aaron NAME R::Wrapper - Wrapper around the RS-Perl R module SYNOPSIS #!/usr/bin/perl -w

Hi thanks for helping. I don't think nut is built with TCP wrappers support, although the package is listed as depending on libwrap... I ran this command: ldd /sbin/upsd | grep libwrap.so and it has returned no output. Does this mean I have to compile from source or is there a way to add the tcp wrapper support? Thanks again. On 24 November 2016 at 22:40, Roger Price <roger at

Hi all, Doug Yung started a discussion earlier ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-September/077227.html) about using the unused "version" field in the bitcode wrapper, and I think there was some misunderstanding. I'd like to clarify the motivation. The reason we want to add the version field is to easily identify "old" bitcode. It is only LLVM version

The Wine development release 3.1 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Kerberos authentication support. - Window class redirection for Common Controls 6. - Support for X11 ARGB visuals. - DOSBox required for running DOS executables. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations:

Dear Open SSH and TCP Wrappers Colleagues, We are trying to use open ssh 3.1p1 on SPARC platforms under Solaris 2.8 using gcc 2.95.2, in conjunction with tcp wrappers 7.6 (IPv6 version). The wrapping of open ssh is not too well documented but I think we have figured most of this out (hearty thanks to Wietse Venema, Jim Mintha & Niels Provos for their helpful email exchanges) -- but have one

Hi ,i get an compile error security -Werror=format-security -MT lucene-wrapper.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/lucene-wrapper.Tpo -c lucene-wrapper.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/lucene-wrapper.o lucene-wrapper.cc: In function 'lucene_index* lucene_index_init(const char*, mailbox_list*, const fts_lucene_settings*)': lucene-wrapper.cc:128:2: error: 'else' without a previous 'if' make[5]:

Hi, We would like to add a version number to the bitcode wrapper. This feature would allow easier identification of what compiler produced the bitcode so that known incompatibilities with LTO compilation could be detected. Roughly speaking, this version number would consist of the major, minor and optionally the patch version of the compiler used to produce the bitcode. The version information

The PE headers of the generated efi file were quite buggy. And since OVMF perform a few consistency checks, syslinux was unable to run on it. I don't pretend to have a thorough understanding of the PE+ headers, some bugs may remain. :) Celelibi (4): efi: Fix PE header field rva_and_sizes_nr efi: Location, size and alignment of .text section efi: Useless relocations in PE file efi: PE

NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: > [CMake] Introduce llvm_add_library(). I recommend moving away from wrappers like this. They indicate that either CMake is not providing the interfaces needed, or not propagating them, or that they exist but are not used. Such wrappers don't parse the arguments in the same way as the wrapped command etc. Wrappers are not good API proxies. Additionally, you put

Derek Ragona wrote: >> I tried to implement a similar scheme in my hosts.allow on a FreeBSD >> 5.2.1 server. But when I try to test it from an IP outside my LAN, it >> still allows ssh logins. I even put in a line in hosts.allow to >> explicitly deny the IP I was ssh'ing from, but it still let me in. >> The behavior gives the appearance that TCP wrappers

I think I more or less understand what a ?wrapper? is, but I?d like to hear how more experienced R users define it, and especially I'd like to know if there is a formal definition. In my reading, it seems like there are a fairly wide range of meanings, but they are all conceptually similar. I've looked in a couple of the classic R texts, the extensions and developers' manuals, and R