Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "wq_busy".
Did you mean:
wq_buf
2024 Jan 11
1
No suspend after update
....797260] Filesystems sync: 0.005 seconds
[ 52.797579] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
[ 52.799127] OOM killer disabled.
[ 52.799128] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
[ 72.805437] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.006 seconds (1 tasks
refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
[ 72.805450] task:NFSv4 callback state:I stack:0 pid:2191
ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
[ 72.805453] Call Trace:
[ 72.805454] <TASK>
[ 72.805456] __schedule+0x21b/0x550
[ 72.805463] schedule+0x2d/0x70
[ 72.805466] nfs41_callback_svc+0x186/0x190 [nfsv4]
[ 72.805508]...
2024 Jan 12
1
No suspend after update
...2024 at 11:57?PM Michael B Allen <ioplex at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just updated CentOS 9 Stream on a Lenovo T17 Gen 4 Intel and now it
> won't suspend with the following error:
...
> [ 72.805437] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.006 seconds (1 tasks
> refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
> [ 72.805450] task:NFSv4 callback state:I stack:0 pid:2191
> ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
FYI
After reverting to 5.14.0-388 yesterday, stability is restored. I can
consistently suspend and resume without issues.
In hindsight, kernel 391 was also giving me issues. My wired netwo...
2024 Jan 12
1
No suspend after update
...B Allen <ioplex at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just updated CentOS 9 Stream on a Lenovo T17 Gen 4 Intel and now it
>> won't suspend with the following error:
> ...
>> [ 72.805437] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.006 seconds (1 tasks
>> refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
>> [ 72.805450] task:NFSv4 callback state:I stack:0 pid:2191
>> ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
>
> FYI
>
> After reverting to 5.14.0-388 yesterday, stability is restored. I can
> consistently suspend and resume without issues.
>
> In hindsight, kernel 39...