Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "wprove".
Did you mean:
prove
2005 Apr 10
1
Fwd: Re: [LLVMdev] new IA64 backend
...gs like
> > out-of-order execution and one can imagine a monster "Itanium 4" (4 as
> > in "Pentium 4" ;) ), but I personally hope that Intel doesn't go down
> > that path - at least not until LLVM/IA64 has had a chance to conquer the
> > world^W^W^Wprove itself in the field. Anyone who saw Intel's
> > presentation at this year's ISSCC will probably hope so too; an Itanium
> > 2/12MB @2.5GHz dissipating ~50W can be a frightfully powerful and fairly
> > _efficient_ device for the 90nm node, but it only shines if you have...
2005 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] new IA64 backend
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 05:04 +0900, Duraid Madina wrote:
> I've just checked in an IA64 backend to LLVM!
Woo hoo! And There Was Much Rejoicing in IA64 Land :-).
--
Ciao,
al
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Al Stone Alter Ego:
Linux & Open Source Lab Debian Developer
Hewlett-Packard
2005 Mar 17
4
[LLVMdev] new IA64 backend
Hi everyone,
I've just checked in an IA64 backend to LLVM! Be warned, it's pretty
rough right now. Here are some of the known defects:
- No varargs
- No alloca
- No instruction scheduling/bundling of any sort
...or in other words, it breaks often and when it does work, it's a
dog. On the plus side, it _does_ have a tasty new pattern instruction
selector. :) Beyond fixing the