search for: wp1

...ot: # /usr/sbin/mount_smbfs -I thome //root at thome/root ./teste Password: # df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on (...) //ROOT at THOME/ROOT 1012974 437266 575708 43% /mnt/teste 6) I dig some log when I was trying to join from vbox (named "triarius-wp1"), but I'm really don't understood this very well. Ex. I don't recognize this "MAILSLOT". I'm really don't know. [2009/12/07 04:58:40, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(802) Received a packet of len 245 from (192.168.1.56) port 138 [2009/12/07 04:58:40, 9] nmbd/...

...m module to work. I added session required pam_chroot.so debug into the /etc/pam.d/sshd file. I changed my passwd file so my home dir is /home/test/./ when I try to login as that user, it just kicks me right now. There are no errors in the log :( Connection to wp1 closed by remote host. Connection to wp1 closed. Maybe someone in here can help. Nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- Nick Twaddell Web Space Solutions Ph: (805) 704-4038 Fx: (805) 434-2477

Hi R-help members, I have read a lot in the Archive about the "Type I" vs "Type III" sum of square. I think I have read confusing post so I want to have a clear idea of the problem. Here is an example. I have 3 groups of subjects of unequal sample size (G1 (n=7), G2 (n=7), G3 (n=4)). for Each subject I have 4 measures corresponding to the crossing of 2 factor (A & B)

...would be willing to offer me. My current data set has 9 columns (in csv / excel file): x coordinate, y coordinate, year, month, day, record, time interval (duration between this waypoint and the previous) (hh:dd:ss), summed time intervals, distance interval (m) EXAMPLE (24th of april 2007) (wp1) x1, y1, 2007, 7, 24, 1, 00:00:00, 00:00:00, 0 (wp2) x2, y2, 2007, 7, 24, 2, 00:00:23, 00:00:23, 2 (wp3) x3, y3, 2007, 7, 24, 3, 00:00:50, 00:00:73, 3 (wp4) x4, y4, 2007, 7, 24, 4, 00:01:20, 00:02:33, 5 (wp5) x5, y5, 2007, 7, 24, 5, 00:00:03, 00:02:36, 1 (wp6) x6, y6, 2007, 7, 24, 6, 00:00:12, 00:0...

...+ yp1[0] = yr; + yp0[1] = yi; + yp0 += 2; + yp1 -= 2; + } + } + + /* Mirror on both sides for TDAC */ + { + kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT xp1 = out+overlap-1; + kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT yp1 = out; + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp1 = window; + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp2 = window+overlap-1; + + for(i = 0; i < overlap/2; i++) + { + kiss_fft_scalar x1, x2; + x1 = *xp1; + x2 = *yp1; + *yp1++ = MULT16_32_Q15(*wp2, x2) - MULT16_32_Q15(*wp1, x1); + *xp1-- = MULT16_3...

...Design: A Review D. A. Preece Biometrics, Vol. 46, No. 4 (Dec., 1990) , pp. 925-935 John Maindonald On 15 Feb 2006, at 10:00 PM, r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch wrote: > From: Peter Dalgaard <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> > Date: 15 February 2006 3:26:27 AM > To: WPhantom <wp1 at tiscali.fr> > Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: Re: [R] A concrete type I/III Sum of square problem > > > WPhantom <wp1 at tiscali.fr> writes: > >> Thanks Brian for the reference. >> I just discover that it is available in our >> library so...

...+ yp1[0] = yr; + yp0[1] = yi; + yp0 += 2; + yp1 -= 2; + } + } + + /* Mirror on both sides for TDAC */ + { + kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT xp1 = out+overlap-1; + kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT yp1 = out; + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp1 = window; + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp2 = window+overlap-1; + + for(i = 0; i < overlap/2; i++) + { + kiss_fft_scalar x1, x2; + x1 = *xp1; + x2 = *yp1; + *yp1++ = MULT16_32_Q15(*wp2, x2) - MULT16_32_Q15(*wp1, x1); + *xp1-- = MULT16_3...

Hello All, I extended the libNE10 optimizations for float towards mdct_backwards/opus_ifft. I am able to get about 14.26% improvement for Decode use case now on my Beaglebone Black. Please see [1] for measurements. Questions 1. Since this patch needs to go in after Encode [2] patch) should I submit this as patch series? 2. Since Jonathan Lennox posted intrinsics cleanup [3] patch, should

...ake it really clear to the compiler what we're doing */ + const kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT xp1 = in+(overlap>>1); + const kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT xp2 = in+N2-1+(overlap>>1); + kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT yp = f; + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp1 = window+(overlap>>1); + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp2 = window+(overlap>>1)-1; + for(i=0;i<((overlap+3)>>2);i++) + { + /* Real part arranged as -d-cR, Imag part arranged as -b+aR*/ + *yp++ = MULT16_32_Q15(*wp2, xp1[N2]) + MULT16_32_Q15(*wp...

Hello opus-dev, I've been cooking up this patchset to integrate NE10 library into opus. Current patchset focuses on encode use case mainly effecting performance of clt_mdct_forward() and opus_fft() (for float only) Glad to report the following on Encode use case: (Measured on my Beaglebone Black Cortex-A8 board) - Performance improvement for encode use case ~= 12.34% (Based on time -p

...ake it really clear to the compiler what we're doing */ + const kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT xp1 = in+(overlap>>1); + const kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT xp2 = in+N2-1+(overlap>>1); + kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT yp = f; + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp1 = window+(overlap>>1); + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp2 = window+(overlap>>1)-1; + for(i=0;i<((overlap+3)>>2);i++) + { + /* Real part arranged as -d-cR, Imag part arranged as -b+aR*/ + *yp++ = MULT16_32_Q15(*wp2, xp1[N2]) + MULT16_32_Q15(*wp...

...ake it really clear to the compiler what we're doing */ + const kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT xp1 = in+(overlap>>1); + const kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT xp2 = in+N2-1+(overlap>>1); + kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT yp = f; + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp1 = window+(overlap>>1); + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp2 = window+(overlap>>1)-1; + for(i=0;i<((overlap+3)>>2);i++) + { + /* Real part arranged as -d-cR, Imag part arranged as -b+aR*/ + *yp++ = MULT16_32_Q15(*wp2, xp1[N2]) + MULT16_32_Q15(*wp...

...ake it really clear to the compiler what we're doing */ + const kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT xp1 = in+(overlap>>1); + const kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT xp2 = in+N2-1+(overlap>>1); + kiss_fft_scalar * OPUS_RESTRICT yp = f; + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp1 = window+(overlap>>1); + const opus_val16 * OPUS_RESTRICT wp2 = window+(overlap>>1)-1; + for(i=0;i<((overlap+3)>>2);i++) + { + /* Real part arranged as -d-cR, Imag part arranged as -b+aR*/ + *yp++ = MULT16_32_Q15(*wp2, xp1[N2]) + MULT16_32_Q15(*wp...

Hi all, For a top quality setup, I will need to install high quality VoIP switches with QoS and PoE. My potential customer should not have any problem with call quality. Experienced folks, Please advice me what switches to install and at what price. I may need it for upto 100 phones. What else should I consider so that phones work without problem along with the computers on the same network?

Changes from RFC PATCH v3 - Just rebased on tip - For all else, please see notes from RFC PATCH v3 at http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/2015-March/002902.html - latest wip opus tree/branch https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/Ne10.git branch: rfcv4_final_fft_ne10 Viswanath Puttagunta (1): armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library Makefile.am

Changes from RFC PATCH v1: - passing arch parameter explicitly - reduced stack usage by ~3.5K by using scaled NE10 fft version - moved all optimization array functions to arm_celt_map.c - Other cleanups pointed out by Timothy Phil, As you mentioned earlier, could you please address all compile and linker errors/warnings coming out of Ne10 library? You can find my working Ne10 repo at [1] You

Changes from RFC PATCH v2 - fixed compile issue when just compiling for --enable-intrinsics for ARMv7 without NE10 - Notes for NE10: - All compile/link warnings are now in upstream NE10 - Only patch pending upstream in NE10 is the one that needs to add -funsafe-math-optimizations for ARMv7 targets. - Phil Wang @ ARM is working on getting this fixed. - Note that even without

...t4.gif msp10.gif msp1.gif msp2.gif msp3.gif msp4.gif msp5.gif msp6.gif msp7.gif msp8.gif msp9.gif msproxy.gif ./tmp/support/images/wingate: sc1.gif sc2.gif sc3.gif sc.gif wg1.gif wg2.gif wg3.gif wg4.gif wg5.gif wingate.gif ./tmp/support/images/winproxy: sc1.gif sc2.gif sc3.gif sc.gif winproxy.gif wp1.gif wp2.gif wp3.gif ./tmp/support/include: support.css ./windows: binkw32.dll Desktop Directx.log Favorites Fonts help INF NetHood Profiles Recent SendTo ShellNew Start Menu system system32 system.ini win.ini WININIT.INI ./windows/Desktop: ./windows/Favorites: ./windows/Fonts: ./windows/help:...

Hi All, Since I continue to base my work on top of Jonathan's patch, and my previous Ne10 fft/ifft/mdct_forward/backward patches, I thought it would be better to just post all new patches as a patch series. Please let me know if anyone disagrees with this approach. You can see wip branch of all latest patches at https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/opus.git Branch:

Hi Timothy, As I mentioned earlier [1], I now fixed compile issues with fixed point and resubmitting the patch. I also have new patch that does intrinsics optimizations for celt_pitch_xcorr targetting aarch64. You can find my latest work-in-progress branch at [2] For reference, you can use the Ne10 pre-built libraries at [3] Note that I am working with Phil at ARM to get my patch at [4]